Case law

Kaufman v. M. T. Davidson Co.

191 Misc. 545 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1947

[a], [c], [e]; Employers Group case, supra; Baltimore Transit Co. v. Flynn, 50 F. Supp. 382 ; May Department Stores Co. v. Brown, 60 F. Supp. 735 ). Therefore, the plaintiff may not maintain the third cause of action. … Further, if the plaintiff had any cause for complaint for failure to comply with- the directives, application should have been made to the board for redress (Sanco Piece Dye Works, Inc., v. Herrick, 33 F. Supp. 80 ).

Downingtown Area School District v. Chester County Board of Assessment Appeals

42 Pa. D. & C.5th 180 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · Oct 29, 2013

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Board of Property Assessment, 539 Pa. 453, 460 , 652 A.2d *188 1306, 1310 (1995). See also 16 McQuillin, The Law of Municipal Corporations §44.124 (3rd Ed.). … Clifton v. Allegheny Co., 969 A.2d 1197, 1210 (Pa. 2009) (citing Leonard v.

Sypek v. Sypek

130 Misc. 2d 796 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1986

To the extent that any New York case law exists on the subject, it does not uphold his position (Brown v Brown, 122 Misc 2d 849 ; see also, In re Bramson [Bramson], 83 Ill App 3d 657, 404 NE2d 469 , wherein sporadic cohabitation … Here, the wife is not receiving "double support that is, second support from anyone with whom she shares bed and board” (Krawczuk v Krawczuk, 49 AD2d 1003 ), in the context of a new economic unit (see generally, Gallet, Former

City of Cincinnati ex rel. Ampt v. City of Cincinnati

11 Ohio C.C. 309 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1896

Benzenberg as expert engineers, to make the investigations and report to said board their conclusions as therein indicated. This employment and action by the board is claimed to be without authority of law. … In the action of the board in the present instance, has the board gone outside of its powers ?

Baker v. Wheeler & Martin

8 Wend. 505 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1832

In Martyn v. Knowllys, 8 T. … In Babcock v. Gill, 10 Johns. R. 237, it was applied to pearl ashes made out of black salts ; and Brown v. Sax, 7 Cowen, 95, was just like this case, except that there the logs were cut on the plaintiff’s land.

Lorillard v. Town of Monroe

12 Barb. 161 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1851

In the case of Bounders v. … Morse, Bartulo and Brown, Justices.]

Oley Valley Development Inc. v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals

41 Pa. D. & C.5th 449 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Aug 11, 2014

Appeals (hereinafter “board”). … Taxpayer contends that it had then, and continues to now, assess the individual lots separately and that, therefore, this case should be distinguished from the holding in Penn’s Grant Associates v.

Martin v. Maine Plumbers' Examining Board

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 4, 2021

See also Narowetz v. Board ofDental Practice, 2021 ME 46 ~ 22, n. 9. C. … See, e.g., Narowetz v. Board ofDental Examiners, 2021 ME 46, ~~ 16-22, _ _A.3d _ _; Lamarre v. Town of China, 2021 ME 45, ~ 16, _ _A.3d ___; Fair Elections Portland, Inc. v.

People ex rel. East River Terminal Railway v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

79 Misc. 134 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1913

United Gas Co. v. Priest, 152 App. Div. 249 ; People ex rel. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co. v. Priest, 206 N. Y. 274 .

Shenandoah Mobile Co. v. Dauphin County Board of Assessment Appeals

68 Pa. D. & C.4th 140 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · May 24, 2004

In support of their position, the appellants cite our Commonwealth Court’s holding in Radecke v. York County Board of Assessment Appeals, 798 A.2d 265 (Pa. *144 Commw. 2002). … Clayton v. Lienhard, 312 Pa. 433, 436-37 , 167 A. 321, 322 (1933).

In re King

170 Misc. 314 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1938

(Thomas v. Teachers’ Retirement Board, supra.) In no sense does a subsequent reappointment, after an unqualified resignation, revive any rights theretofore terminated. … (Matter of Brown v. Teachers’ Retirement Board, 239 App. Div. 178 ; affd., 264 N. Y. 493 ; Wilmerding v. Bonaschi, 166 Misc. 140 , and cases cited therein.)

Cobbe v. Stowe

171 Misc. 687 · New York County Court, Delaware County · Jul 12, 1939

Brown, J., Acting County Judge. This matter is presented on a statement of conceded facts. … (Central Trust Co. v. West India Imp. Co., 169 N. Y. 314 ; Bush v. Lathrop, 22 id. 535; Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Iba, 155 id. 224; Fox v. Vim Electric Co., Inc., supra.)

Air Conditioning Training Corp. v. Perrymen

178 Misc. 399 · New York Supreme Court · May 7, 1942

(Goldsmith v. Brown, 176 Misc. 257 .) … Read together, these provisions declare that no action may be brought ón a contract for instruction unless two things shall have concurred, to wit, that the form of contract shall have been approved by the board of education

Sackett & Wilhelms Lithographing & Printing Co. v. National Ass'n of Employing Lithographers

61 Misc. 150 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1908

Williams v. Montgomery, 148 N. Y. 519 ; Kelley v. McMahon, 37 Hun, 212 ; Brown v. Utopia Land Co., 118 App. Div. 190 . The resolution of September twenty-first attempted to establish the “ Closed shop.” … Co. v. Waldhauer, *159 47 Misc. Rep. 7 ; McCord v. Thompson-Starrett Co., N. Y. L.

Tanner v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

43 Ill. Ct. Cl. 12 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 9, 1989

(Starnowski v. License Appeal Com'm. of the City of Chicago (1981), 101 Ill. App. 3d 1050 , 428 N.E.2d 1102 .)

Wooden v. Western New York & P. R. Co.

18 N.Y.S. 768 · Superior Court of Buffalo · May 4, 1892

What does appear is this: That standing orders not appearing in the book of rules the men find on the bulletin boards. That the rule in question had been posted upon the bulletin board for a long time. … Sherman v. Railroad Co., 17 N. Y. 158 ; Dobbins v. Brown, 119 N. Y. 188 , 23 N. E. Rep. 537; Crispin v. Babbitt, 81 N. Y. 516 ; Neubauer v. Railroad Co., 101 N. Y. 607 , 4 N. E. Rep. 125; Rose v. Railroad Co., 58 N.

Rebesher v. Rebesher

126 N.Y.S. 572 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1910

BROWN, J. John 3?. Rebesher, the father of the plaintiffs and Ann Rebesher, died April 8, 1899, leaving a last will and testament, wherein he bequeathed to his children all his property and appointed John G. … Bertha Rebesher is entitled to....................................$ 751 31 Board, etc., 220 weeks, at $2.25...........................$495 00 Board, etc., at Sisters of Good Shepherd.................. 42 69 --- 537 09 $ 213

Malik v. Coughlin

133 Misc. 2d 245 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1986

Brown, J. … judgment, pursuant to CPLR article 78, reversing and vacating the disposition of a Superintendent’s proceeding at Great Meadow Correctional Facility, its affirmance by the Department of Correctional *246 Services Review Board

State v. Huegel

41 Fla. Supp. 133 · Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Okeechobee County · Oct 21, 1974

Bulletin boards and other employee areas where posting is allowed may be used for notification of union meetings, handbills, flyers, newsletters, etc.” … Brown and the defendant and Mr. Brown, asked the defendant not to go in.

Board of Education of the Union Free School District No. 11 v. Nyquist

51 Misc. 2d 902 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1966

(Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Allen, 6 N Y 2d 127; Matter of Vetere v. Allen, 15 N Y 2d 259.) … Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Finley, 211 N. Y. 51, 57 [1914]).