Case law

O'Donnell v. Antin

81 Misc. 2d 849 · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 1974

(Matter of Brown v Allen, 23 AD2d 591 ; Matter of Sands Point Academy v Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 63 Misc 2d 276 .) … (Everson v Board of Educ., 330 US 1 ; Wenner v Board of Educ., 71 Misc 2d 978 .)

Bell v. Lesbini

66 How. Pr. 385 · City of New York Municipal Court · Mar 15, 1883

Brown, J. Section 501 allows a counter-claim arising out of the contract or transaction set forth in the complaint as the foundation of the plaintiff’s claim or connected with the subject of the action. … It cannot have relation to the contract for the rooms and 'board, and no part of the sum is claimed to be for damages for the ejectment from the rooms.

Rice v. Board of Education of Central High School District No. 2

40 Misc. 2d 1092 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1963

by the respondent Board of Education. … (Matter of Bentley v. Herminger, 10 A D 2d 900.)

People v. Postall

153 Misc. 2d 167 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1992

In Matter of Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v Board of Educ. ( 70 NY2d 57, 68, 69 ), the court held that the Fourth Amendment and NY Constitution, article I, § 12 protect public employees against unreasonable searches … United States v. Collins, 349 F.2d 863 (2d Cir. 1965). cert. denied. 383 U.S. 960 (1966); United States v. Donato, 379 F.2d 288 (3d Cir. 1967); United States v.

People ex rel. O'Connor v. Berbary

195 Misc. 2d 36 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2002

Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d 391 [1987]; Fritz v Huntington Hosp., 39 NY2d 339, 347 [1976]). … (See also, People v Huntley, 43 NY2d 175, 181 [1977].)

Spectrum Healthcare Resources, Inc. v. Prince William County Board of Supervisors

83 Va. Cir. 418 · King William County Circuit Court · Oct 5, 2011

v. … Crucible, Inc., 278 Va. 152 (2009) (“Crucible”), and Holland v. Johnson, 241 Va. 553 (1991).

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Richmond County School Board

20 Va. Cir. 101 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Feb 23, 1990

As stated in Balboa Insurance Company v. Fulton County, 141 Ga. … Neither Board of Supervisors of Stafford County v. Safeco, 226 Va. 329 (1983), nor Continental Realty Corp. v. Andrew J. Crevolin, 380 F. Supp. 246 (S.D. W.

Jobbitt v. Giles

29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 274 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1880

(Butterworth v. Stagg, 2 Johns. Cases, 291.) Persons not parties to the record are frequently charged with costs. … The motion for re-argument is denied with $10 costs against Brown. Present — Learned, P. J., and Bockes, J..; Follett, J., not ..acting. Motion for re-argument denied, with $10 costs, and disburse--^ ments.

Shenandoah Mobile Co. v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals

68 Pa. D. & C.4th 529 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Sep 15, 2004

(quoting Michigan National Bank v. City of Lansing, 96 Mich. App. 551, 554 , 293 N.W.2d 626, 627 (1980)). … See e.g., Shenandoah Mobile Company v. Dauphin County Board of Assessment Appeals, docketed at 2003 CV 3196 TX, Dauphin County, 2004, PICS case no. 04-1456 (Dauphin Cty. May 24, 2004).

People ex rel. Pinckney v. New York Board of Fire Underwriters

54 How. Pr. 240 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

I did not understand the counsel for the relator as contending, on the argument, that the expulsion of the Belief Fire Insurance Company from the board of fire underwriters was invalid, for the reason that a fair opportunity … I shall not, therefore, inquire in disposing of this motion, whether the relator had due and proper notice of the proceedings taken for its expulsion from the board, and shall *242 confine myself simply to a statement of

McLean Hamlet Citizens, Inc. v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

40 Va. Cir. 69 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Oct 25, 1995

Byrum v. Orange County, 217 Va. 37, 40 (1976); County Board of Arlington County v. Bratick, 237 Va. 221, 227 (1989). The presumption is a rebuttable one. … Bratick, 237 Va. at 227 ; Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v. Jackson, 221 Va. 328, 334-35 (1980).

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Virginia State Water Control Board

25 Va. Cir. 64 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Mar 6, 1991

Lawler, for a temporary stay of the State Water Control Board (Board) decision to amend VPDES permit No. VA0003646 issued to Westvaco, Inc. Westvaco has been granted permission to intervene. … See, e.g., Johnston-Willis v. Kenley, 6 Va. App. 231 , 369 S.E.2d 1 (1988). The choice on the part of the Board to use a standard which allows detection by current EPA methodology is not outside of its authority.

People ex rel. Fallon v. Board of Police Commissioners

38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 209 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883

Mohr v. … Farrell v.

Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Sanford Real Estate Corp.

157 Misc. 563 · New York County Courts · Jan 10, 1935

Brown, the holder of a chattel mortgage, and involves the ownership of fixtures and similar property in said apartment house. … (Perfect Lighting Fixtures Co., Inc., v. Grubar Realty Corp., 228 App. Div. 145 ; Hobart Holding Co., Inc., v. Fortwell Realty Corp., 232 id. 689, 690.)

General Realty Associates of 12th Street v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

125 Misc. 2d 173 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1984

(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 .) … While regrettable, and unfortunate, the Board has no legal obligation to warn a landlord that a decision is soon to be made.

Semanderes v. PennDOT

4 Pa. D. & C.4th 407 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Apr 28, 1989

Brown, supra at 419 , 386 A.2d at 1054 ; Klick v. Commonwealth, 20 Pa. Commw. 627, 631 , 342 A.2d 794, 797 (1975). … In Brown v.

Architects' Certificates

4 Pa. D. & C. 766 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Harrisburg County · May 15, 1924

Kast, Secretary, State Board of Examiners of Architects. Brown, Dep. Att’y-Gen., — Your inquiries as to the right of a corporation to practice architecture in this State have been received by this department. … In passing upon the right of a corporation to practice dentistry, it was held in Com. v. Alba Dentists Co., 30 Pa. C. C. Reps. 65,13 Dist.

People ex rel. Siebert v. Board of Police Commissioners

27 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 333 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1880

“By order of the board of police. “ (Signed), S. C. HAWLEY, “ Qhief Clerk.” The manner, and the extent to which such proceedings may be reviewed, is very clearly defined in The People v. … (See also The People v. The Board of Police, etc., 39 N. Y., 506 .)

People ex rel. Cummings v. Board of Fire Commissioners

19 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 500 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1878

The opinion of Judge Sutherland in People v. … (See, also, The People v. Bearfield, 35 Barb., 254 .) The view thus expressed of the question is fully answered by the case of The People v. Board of Police ( 39 N.

Ohio Oil Co. v. Toledo, Findlay & Springfield Railroad

4 Ohio C.C. 210 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1889