Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.14s
Board of Supervisors of the County of Schuyler v. Bank of Havana
12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 649 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1875
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 v. Hickcox
31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 237 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1881
Cited 0 timesPublishedSouth Wales Utility, Inc. v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Water Control Board
22 Va. Cir. 16 · Culpeper County Circuit Court · May 11, 1990
(Utility), a Virginia public service corporation, has appealed to this court a decision of the State Water Control Board (SWCB) denying Utility’s application for a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (permit … erroneously failed to issue a permit because of litigation pending in this court. *17 The SWCB, on recommendation of its staff, denied the permit until litigation in this court in the suit of Homestretch Corporation, et al. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished180 Misc. 798 · New York County Courts · Apr 21, 1943
Brown v. Board of Supervisors ( 170 App. Div. 364, 371 ) and therein described as “ Ballot 79.” … Simons v. Knickerbocker ( 255 App. Div. 212 , affd. 250 N. Y. 594 ).
Cited 5 timesPublishedWashington Township v. Gillette
26 Pa. D. & C.4th 92 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Jul 22, 1994
BROWN, S.J., FACTS This is a civil enforcement action brought by plaintiff against defendant at the district justice level regarding plaintiff’s being in violation of the local zoning ordinance. … Subsequently (on a date unknown to the court), the board sent out a written notice which contained two decisions signed by the board members.
Cited 1 timesPublishedForest Hills Local School District Board of Education v. Noe
144 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 · Clermont County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 3, 2007
Dresher v. … Motors Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCouncil of the City of N.Y. v. Adams
2025 NY Slip Op 25141 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jun 12, 2025
Kornstein, Esq., Daniel Matza-Brown, Esq., Nwamaka Ejebe, Esq. and Hafsa S. Mansoor, Esq. For Defendants-Respondents: Rolando T. Acosta, Esq., James M. Catterson, Esq., and Danielle Stefanucci, Esq. … Mary V. Rosado, J.
Cited 1 timesPublished70 Va. Cir. 415 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · May 31, 2006
Brown, Jr., Lome Reid’s half-brother, also a co-defendant. Witcher claims that she did not know of or agree to the sale and that the actual value of the property was approximately $ 110,000. … See Gossett v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedProgress Grange 96 v. Centre County Board of Assessment Appeals
3 Pa. D. & C.5th 233 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County · Dec 12, 2007
The court grants the appeal, and reverses the decision of the Board of Assessment and finds that Progress Grange #96 qualifies for exemption from real estate taxes. … Hospital Utilization Project v. Commonwealth, 501 Pa. 1, 21-22 , 487 A.2d 1306, 1317 (1985) (HUP).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKirkpatrick & Blaker Associates, Ltd. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors
62 Va. Cir. 242 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Jul 7, 2003
Thompson v. Skate America, Inc., 261 Va. 121, 128 (2001). Although a demurrer does not admit the correctness ofthe conclusions of law in a pleading, Ward’s Equip., Inc. v. … Cox Cable Hampton Roads, Inc. v. City of Norfolk, 242 Va. 394, 397 (1991).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBergansky v. State of New York Liquor Authority
68 Misc. 2d 251 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1971
(Matter of Brown v. Murphy, 34 Misc 2d 151 , citing cases.) … Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U. S. 232 ; Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U. S. 117 .) Matter of Vassallo v. State Liq. Auth. (21 A D 2d 880), relied on by respondent, is distinguishable.
Reversed by Bergansky v. State of New York Liquor Authority, 39 A.D.2d 849 (1972)Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Strough v. Board of County Canvassers
84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 372 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894
Y. 493 ; McKenna v. Edmundstone, 91 id. 231; People v. Quigg, 59 id. 83, 88.) … Stiner v. Morrison, 78 N. Y. 84, 89 ; Smith v. The People, 47 id. 330, 339; Whipple v. Christian, 80 id. 523, 526; Van Vranken v. City of Schenectady, 31 Hun, 516 , 518.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedColumbus Green Cabs, Inc. v. Board of Review Bureau of Unemployment Compensation
88 Ohio Law. Abs. 107 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Oct 30, 1961
The case of Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. … The action of the Board of Review in adopting these rules is presumed to have been done in good faith and imparts verity. Bloch v. Glander, 151 Ohio St., 381 .
Cited 1 timesPublished12 Misc. 3d 887 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2006
However, “[n]either the Medical Board nor the Board of Trustees [are] required to identify the actual cause of the heart *891 condition at issue.” (Matter of Stegmuller v Brown, 216 AD2d 23, 23 [1st Dept 1995].) … The operative facts were known to the Medical Board on both occasions. Although the Medical Board’s own conclusion is considered expert opinion (cf Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y.
Cited 1 timesPublished137 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1987
By letter dated September 11, 1987, the Board of Elections notified petitioner that it would not sustain the objections on the grounds that the certificate of nominations was valid on its face and that the Board had no authority … 1 AD2d 954 ; Matter of Tenneriello v Board of Elections, 125 Misc 2d 190 , revd on other grounds 104 AD2d 467 ; compare, Matter of Tamney v Atkins, 151 App Div 309 , revd on other grounds 209 NY 202 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedNew York State Association of Community Action Agency Board Members v. Shaffer
125 Misc. 2d 613 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1984
The petitioners are an unincorporated association and a not-for-profit organization made up of members of the board of directors of organizations, each of which qualifies as an entity eligible for CSBG program funds.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBean v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 17
71 Misc. 2d 747 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1972
acts of school authorities by the Commissioner of Education, it has been held that the Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Commissioner to hear and determine an application of this nature (Matter of Galloway v. … may not substitute its judgment for that of the school board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHardwicke v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 8
46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 652 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1886
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Prospect Park & Coney Island Railroad v. Board of Assessors
4 N.Y.S. 85 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1889
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. American Road Machine Co. v. Town Board of Auditors
80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1893
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna