Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

2.14s

  • Board of Supervisors of the County of Schuyler v. Bank of Havana

    12 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 649 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1875

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 v. Hickcox

    31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 237 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • South Wales Utility, Inc. v. Commonwealth ex rel. State Water Control Board

    22 Va. Cir. 16 · Culpeper County Circuit Court · May 11, 1990

    (Utility), a Virginia public service corporation, has appealed to this court a decision of the State Water Control Board (SWCB) denying Utility’s application for a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit (permit … erroneously failed to issue a permit because of litigation pending in this court. *17 The SWCB, on recommendation of its staff, denied the permit until litigation in this court in the suit of Homestretch Corporation, et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Slater

    180 Misc. 798 · New York County Courts · Apr 21, 1943

    Brown v. Board of Supervisors ( 170 App. Div. 364, 371 ) and therein described as “ Ballot 79.” … Simons v. Knickerbocker ( 255 App. Div. 212 , affd. 250 N. Y. 594 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Washington Township v. Gillette

    26 Pa. D. & C.4th 92 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Jul 22, 1994

    BROWN, S.J., FACTS This is a civil enforcement action brought by plaintiff against defendant at the district justice level regarding plaintiff’s being in violation of the local zoning ordinance. … Subsequently (on a date unknown to the court), the board sent out a written notice which contained two decisions signed by the board members.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Forest Hills Local School District Board of Education v. Noe

    144 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 · Clermont County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 3, 2007

    Dresher v. … Motors Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Council of the City of N.Y. v. Adams

    2025 NY Slip Op 25141 · New York Supreme Court, New York County · Jun 12, 2025

    Kornstein, Esq., Daniel Matza-Brown, Esq., Nwamaka Ejebe, Esq. and Hafsa S. Mansoor, Esq. For Defendants-Respondents: Rolando T. Acosta, Esq., James M. Catterson, Esq., and Danielle Stefanucci, Esq. … Mary V. Rosado, J.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Witcher v. Reid

    70 Va. Cir. 415 · Norfolk County Circuit Court · May 31, 2006

    Brown, Jr., Lome Reid’s half-brother, also a co-defendant. Witcher claims that she did not know of or agree to the sale and that the actual value of the property was approximately $ 110,000. … See Gossett v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Progress Grange 96 v. Centre County Board of Assessment Appeals

    3 Pa. D. & C.5th 233 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Centre County · Dec 12, 2007

    The court grants the appeal, and reverses the decision of the Board of Assessment and finds that Progress Grange #96 qualifies for exemption from real estate taxes. … Hospital Utilization Project v. Commonwealth, 501 Pa. 1, 21-22 , 487 A.2d 1306, 1317 (1985) (HUP).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kirkpatrick & Blaker Associates, Ltd. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

    62 Va. Cir. 242 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Jul 7, 2003

    Thompson v. Skate America, Inc., 261 Va. 121, 128 (2001). Although a demurrer does not admit the correctness ofthe conclusions of law in a pleading, Ward’s Equip., Inc. v. … Cox Cable Hampton Roads, Inc. v. City of Norfolk, 242 Va. 394, 397 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bergansky v. State of New York Liquor Authority

    68 Misc. 2d 251 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1971

    (Matter of Brown v. Murphy, 34 Misc 2d 151 , citing cases.) … Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U. S. 232 ; Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U. S. 117 .) Matter of Vassallo v. State Liq. Auth. (21 A D 2d 880), relied on by respondent, is distinguishable.

    Reversed by Bergansky v. State of New York Liquor Authority, 39 A.D.2d 849 (1972)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Strough v. Board of County Canvassers

    84 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 372 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1894

    Y. 493 ; McKenna v. Edmundstone, 91 id. 231; People v. Quigg, 59 id. 83, 88.) … Stiner v. Morrison, 78 N. Y. 84, 89 ; Smith v. The People, 47 id. 330, 339; Whipple v. Christian, 80 id. 523, 526; Van Vranken v. City of Schenectady, 31 Hun, 516 , 518.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Columbus Green Cabs, Inc. v. Board of Review Bureau of Unemployment Compensation

    88 Ohio Law. Abs. 107 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Oct 30, 1961

    The case of Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. … The action of the Board of Review in adopting these rules is presumed to have been done in good faith and imparts verity. Bloch v. Glander, 151 Ohio St., 381 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Travers v. Kelly

    12 Misc. 3d 887 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2006

    However, “[n]either the Medical Board nor the Board of Trustees [are] required to identify the actual cause of the heart *891 condition at issue.” (Matter of Stegmuller v Brown, 216 AD2d 23, 23 [1st Dept 1995].) … The operative facts were known to the Medical Board on both occasions. Although the Medical Board’s own conclusion is considered expert opinion (cf Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Visconti v. Paino

    137 Misc. 2d 1 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1987

    By letter dated September 11, 1987, the Board of Elections notified petitioner that it would not sustain the objections on the grounds that the certificate of nominations was valid on its face and that the Board had no authority … 1 AD2d 954 ; Matter of Tenneriello v Board of Elections, 125 Misc 2d 190 , revd on other grounds 104 AD2d 467 ; compare, Matter of Tamney v Atkins, 151 App Div 309 , revd on other grounds 209 NY 202 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • New York State Association of Community Action Agency Board Members v. Shaffer

    125 Misc. 2d 613 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1984

    The petitioners are an unincorporated association and a not-for-profit organization made up of members of the board of directors of organizations, each of which qualifies as an entity eligible for CSBG program funds.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bean v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 17

    71 Misc. 2d 747 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1972

    acts of school authorities by the Commissioner of Education, it has been held that the Supreme Court has concurrent jurisdiction with the Commissioner to hear and determine an application of this nature (Matter of Galloway v. … may not substitute its judgment for that of the school board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hardwicke v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 8

    46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 652 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Prospect Park & Coney Island Railroad v. Board of Assessors

    4 N.Y.S. 85 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1889

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. American Road Machine Co. v. Town Board of Auditors

    80 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 615 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1893

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.