Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.36s

  • 551 Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. Masch

    185 Misc. 142 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jun 8, 1945

    (Stern v. Equitable Trust Co., 238 N. Y. 267 .) He is entitled to occupy the same space and have the same services and facilities as he had when his lease or rental agreement was in force and effect.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Kasarda's Petition

    27 Pa. D. & C. 421 · Luzerne County Court of Quarter Sessions · Feb 7, 1936

    The court has the right to exercise its sound and judicial discretion in sustaining the board: Raschiatore’s Appeal, 19 Westm. 285; and,the provisions of the statute must be complied with: Browne’s Application, 22 D. & C. … Where there is ample evidence justifying the board in refusing an application, the board will be sustained: Privol’s Appeal, 20 D. & C. 163.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Defiance City Bank Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

    5 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 225 · Defiance County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 25, 1906

    (State v. Dalton, 1 C. C. Rep., 119). … Boren v. Commissioners, 21 O. S., 311; State v. Commissioners, 39 O. S., 188; Knorr v. Miller, 6 C. C. Rep., 609.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. City of Mt. Vernon v. Board of County Commissioners

    4 Ohio N.P. 343 · Knox County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 15, 1897

    Vernon, Ohio, filed its petition in this court in which it sets forth that it is a city of the fourth grade of the second class; that the respondents, the board of county commissioners of Knox county, the auditor and treasurer … Work v. Massie, 6 Ohio, 503. “A repeal by implication has been effected where two inconsistent enactments have been passed at the same session. ” Endlich on the Interpretation of Statutes, p. 259.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Union Free Schools, District No. 2 v. Reid

    29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 145 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1880

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Commercial Cable Co. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    99 Misc. 532 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1917

    Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460 ; Baltic Mining Co. v. Massachusetts, 231 id. 68; Met. St. Ry. Co. v. N. Y., 19 U. S. 1 . In Kansas City Ry. v. Kansas, 240 U. … to show that the result arrived at by the board is incorrect.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Buholtz v. Board of Directors of Rochester Philharmonic Orchestra, Inc.

    39 Misc. 3d 491 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 2013

    At oral argument, it was clarified that, when the conversation occurred, January 27, 2013, Burke was no longer a member of the board and therefore could not bind defendant corporation within the contemplation of Niesig v … Co. v City of N.Y.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LaRocca v. Board of Education of the Jericho Union Free School District

    159 Misc. 2d 90 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1993

    Horowitz were filed by the relevant Board of Education pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a and thereafter on December 3, 1992 the Board of Education gave the superintendent of schools full authority within his discretion to … While the case of Doe v Office of Professional Med. Conduct of N. Y.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Department of Highways

    13 Ct. Cl. 414 · West Virginia Court of Claims · May 11, 1981

    See also Whiting v. State Board of Education, 8 Ct.Cl. 45 (1969). … Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 185 (1978), Allison v. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 84 (1978); drainpipes were negligently maintained, Brown v. Dept. of Highways, 12 Ct.Cl. 125 (1978), Maynard v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • City of Coral Springs v. Broward County Air & Water Pollution Control Board

    39 Fla. Supp. 197 · Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Broward County · Jul 6, 1973

    The first count alleges that regulation 73-3 of the board is void in that it conflicts with the enabling act of the board. … On May 2, 1973 the board adopted regulation 73-2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. People

    1 Park. Cr. 347 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1852

    In our own state, in The People v. … Deceased continued to urge Brown along, and at length got him, according to the testimony, as far as the alley way to the house in which he boarded, when a third clenching took place, Brown trying to throw tlm deceased.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. State

    52 Misc. 2d 324 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1966

    Y. 467 ; Matter of McAneny v. Board of Estimate and Apportionment of City of N. Y., 232 N. Y. 377 ). … Young, J., in holding that a section of the Education Law which established town boards of education in all counties except Nassau was not an ureasonable classification, stated in Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Billings v. Dressler

    5 Ohio N.P. 114 · Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas · Dec 15, 1897

    For illustration see State ex rel. v. Commissioners, 26 Ohio St., 364 ; Com’rs. Noyes, 35 Ohio St., 201 (holding that com’rs have power to sue); Butler v. Com’rs., 49 Ohio St., 301 , and Com’rs. v. … Brown, et al., members of the board of control of Hamilton county, that the board of control “has no functions or capacities whatever, except the supervisory power over certain acts of the commissioners.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. A., B. & C. R. R.

    21 Ohio C.C. 769 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1896

    This is the case of The Board of Commissioners of Cuya *770 hoga county v. The A. B. & C. R. R.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ristine v. School District

    26 Pa. D. & C. 655 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jun 23, 1936

    Brown, Jr., J., This bill was filed on August 24,1934, by the plaintiffs, George N. … Redding, 234 Pa. 481, 484 ; Robb et al. v. Stone et al., etc., 296 Pa. 482, 492 . See also Roth v. Marshall et al., 158 Pa. 272, 274 ; Hysong et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Connelly v. City of Elmira

    144 Misc. 282 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1932

    (Matter of Dovel Co. v. Village of Lynbrook, 213 App. Div. 570 ; Knowles v. City of New York, 176 N. Y. 430, 438 ; Browne v. Walker, 131 Misc. 736 .) … If the board was entitled to use its judgment, how can fraud or the like be so inferred in the absence of the allegation of any facts indicating collusion or improper motives? In Cook v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brinkerhoff v. Tiernan

    61 Misc. 586 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

    Lewis v. Cook, 150 N. Y. 163 ; Long v. Rodgers, 79 *589 Hun, 441 . … Kerr v. Blodgett, 48 N. Y. 62 ; Brinckerhoff v. Bostwick, 99 id. 185 ; MacArdell v. Olcott, 62 App. Div. 127 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McKiernan v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1

    1 Misc. 2d 925 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1956

    The claimant contends that, under the circumstances, the board has waived the requirement of the statute as to manner of service of the notice of claim and cites particularly Teresta v. City of New York ( 304 N. … Y. 440 ) and Boettner v. Village of Mamaroneck (123 N. Y. S. 2d 849).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of County Commissioners v. Jerry's of Palm Beach, Inc.

    18 Fla. Supp. 2d 45 · Palm Beach County Court · May 16, 1986

    Askew v. Schuster, 331 So.2d 297, 300 (Fla. 1976); State v. Dunman, 427 So.2d 166, 168 (Fla. 1983). … Accord, Wisconsin Real Estate Investment Trust v. Rouse, 12 Fla. Supp. 2d 39, 40 (Orange Cty. Ct. 1985); see, CKN Airways, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Melo v. Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services, Inc.

    183 Misc. 2d 776 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1999

    (See, Matter of Blanchard v Integrated Food Sys., 220 AD2d 895 ; Acevedo v Consolidated Edison Co., 189 AD2d 497 .) … The Appellate Division, Third Department, remitted the matter to the Board for clarification as to whether the Board in fact weighed the available evidence and properly determined that the statutory presumption in favor of

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.