Case law

Dickinson College v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals

45 Pa. D. & C.3d 97 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Mar 31, 1987

Y.M.C.A. of Germantown v. Philadelphia, 323 Pa. 401 , 187 Atl. 204 (1936). … In City of Pittsburgh v. Co. of Allegheny, et al, 50 Pa.

Tohickon Creek Associates v. Richland Twp. Board of Supervisors

50 Pa. D. & C.3d 563 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Mar 15, 1988

Eckert v. Buckley, 23 Pa. Commw. 82 , 350 A.2d 417 (1976); Suburban Group Inc. v. Gittings, 22 Pa. Commw. 295 , 348 A.2d 490 (1975); Board of Supervisors of North Coventry Township v. Silverfox Corporation, 10 Pa. … Likewise, Pace Resources v. Shrewsbury Township Planning Commission and Shrewsbury Township Board of Supervisors, 89 Pa.

Bensalem Township Citizens Club v. Pa. Liquor Control Board

37 Pa. D. & C.3d 312 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Nov 27, 1985

Accord, Carverhouse Liquor License Case, 454 Pa. 38 , 310 A.2d 81 (1973), and Commonwealth v. M.S.G., Inc., 7 Pa. Commw. 540 , 297 A.2d 556 (1972). … Commonwealth v. Eclectic Enterprises, Inc., 76 Pa. Commw. 626 , 464 A.2d 683 (1983).

City of Syracuse v. Wright

4 Misc. 2d 714 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1956

The case of Mills v. Sweeney ( 219 N. … Griffin v. Mayor of Brooklyn ( 4 N. Y. 419 ); Humphrey v. Chamberlain ( 11 N. Y. 274 ); Newell Universal Mill Co. v. Muxlow ( 115 N. Y. 170 ).

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Weber

30 Ohio Law Rep. 95 · Scioto County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 29, 1965

On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. Report confirmed and respondent suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period. Taft, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

R & L Development Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals

20 Pa. D. & C.3d 774 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County · Dec 10, 1980

The board may change the assessed value whenever there is an addition to the property. … The board chose to put this information on the tax card in its own unique way, but neither party has been harmed by this. The board is assessing coal, no matter what they call it on the card.

Rohart v. Jim Thorpe Area Board of School Directors

17 Pa. D. & C.3d 711 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County · Feb 2, 1981

See Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 620 , 350 A. 2d 203 (1976). … A suspension for any other reason is invalid and will result in the reinstatement of the professional employe, with back pay, even if his former position has been abolished: Sporie v.

L. T. Verrastro, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

9 Pa. D. & C.3d 222 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · May 2, 1977

board to transfer the license. … The law of Pennsylvania, as applied by a Federal court sitting in Pennsylvania, required that a valid “arrest” for this sort of misdemeanor be made pursuant to a warrant: United States v. Grasso, 225 F.

Dennis & Williams v. Ludlow

2 Cai. Cas. 111 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1804

Because the time of sailing was when the vessel broke ground at Savannah, with her clearance, - cargo, *and papers on board; 2. Because in fact, she went to sea on the 30th September; 3. … As to the inception of the voyage (see Henshaw v. Mar. Ins. Co., post, 274,) by sailing from the port of'Savannah, or from Oockspur; this will depend on the quo animo, or bona fide intent of the party.

Tax Review Board v. Eglin's 30th Street Garage Corp.

61 Pa. D. & C.2d 65 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 19, 1973

On these grounds, appellant then appealed the revenue commissioner’s decision to the Tax Review Board. … For the same result in other jurisdictions, see State of Mississippi v. Paramount-Gulf Theatres, Inc., 226 *68 Miss. 404 , 84 So. 2d 403 (1956); Kesbec, Inc. v.

H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

71 Pa. D. & C.2d 622 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Jan 26, 1976

Zoning Board of Adjustment of Montgomery Township, supra, and Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra. … See Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 425 Pa. 43 , 228 A.2d 169 (1967) by the use of a variance proceeding: Robin Corp. v. Board of Supervisors of Lower Paxton Township, 17 Pa.

Funeral Directors Ass'n v. State Board of Funeral Directors

42 Pa. D. & C.2d 607 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · May 23, 1967

Plaintiff association’s contention that it is a party which has a direct interest in this proceeding was rejected by this court in State Board of Funeral Directors v. … “In our judgment, the very question involved in this case has been passed upon by our Supreme Court in State Board of Undertakers v. Joseph T.

La Clair v. Caswell

112 Misc. 2d 979 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1982

Brown, 37 AD2d 865 ). … (Matter of Potash v Molik, 35 Misc 2d 1, 3 , affd on other grounds 17 AD2d 111 .) This special proceeding commenced by petitioners is found to be timely.

Warren Foundry & Pipe Corp. v. Board of Water Commissioners of Village of Ossining

146 Misc. 323 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1932

Buchko v. Board of Education of Connetquot Central School District No. 7

43 Misc. 2d 43 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1964

Board of Educ., 259 N. Y. 191 ; Cottrell v. Board of Educ., supra; Levert v. Central School Dist. No. 6, 24 Misc 2d 833 ,10 A D 2d 975.) … There is no illegality per se in such procedure (see Matter of Board of Educ. v. Wilson, 303 N. Y. 107 ). The conclusory allegations of unconstitutionality and illegality are insufficient (Matter of Board of Educ. v.

LaRocca v. Board of Education of the Jericho Union Free School District

159 Misc. 2d 90 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1993

Horowitz were filed by the relevant Board of Education pursuant to Education Law § 3020-a and thereafter on December 3, 1992 the Board of Education gave the superintendent of schools full authority within his discretion to … While the case of Doe v Office of Professional Med. Conduct of N. Y.

Premier Cereal & Beverage Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcohol Permit Board

9 Pa. D. & C. 554 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 15, 1927

Com. v. … There is no provision in the acts of the legislature or in the rules of the Board providing for a jury trial. Van Swartow v.

Becker v. Board of Education of Middleburgh Central School District No. 1

16 Misc. 2d 909 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1958

(Matter of Feldbauer v. Board of Educ., 65 N. Y. St. Dept. Rep. 68.) … (Matter of Geruso v. Board of Educ., 71 N. Y. St. Dept.

Providence Village Townhome Condominium Ass'n Board of Directors v. Allied Plywood Corp.

37 Va. Cir. 192 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Jul 26, 1995

See, e.g., Rosillo v. Winters, 235 Va. 268 (1988). … See Daughtrey v. Ashe, 243 Va. 73 (1992).

Westfall v. Gere

3 Lans. 151 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1870

S., 394, § 33; id., 396, § 37; Parish v. Golden, 35 N. Y., 462 ; Van Rensselaer v. Whitbeck, 7 id., 517 .) … (Henderson v. Brown, 1 Caines, 92 ; Sheldon v. Van Buskirk, 2 N. Y., 473 ; Trustees of Rochester v. Symonds, 7 Wend., 392 .)