Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.48s

  • 2600 Lewis Inc. v. Board of License & Inspection Review

    22 Pa. D. & C.4th 333 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 18, 1994

    See e.g., Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Philadelphia Gas Commission, 27 Phila. 140 , 142 & n.5 (1994). … Because the LIB’s interpretation is plausible, it is binding upon common pleas, see e.g., Giant Eagle Inc. v. Commonwealth Milk Marketing Board, 157 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. State of Illinois, Illinois Local Governmental Law Enforcement Officers Training Board

    27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 204 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 27, 1971

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Bruno v. City of Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    27 Pa. D. & C.4th 477 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 9, 1994

    See also, Relosky v. … See e.g., Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lower Saucon Township v. Election Board of Northampton County

    27 Pa. D. & C.3d 387 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · Apr 5, 1983

    See, e.g., Robeson v. Philadelphia Tax Review Board, 13 Pa. Commw. Ct. 513, 319 A.2d 201 (1974); Home Builders Association of Metropolitan Pittsburgh v. Allegheny County Plumbing Board, 50 D. & C. 2d 275 (1970). . … See Upper Saucon Twp., et al. v. Election Board of Lehigh County, No. 83-C-279. . Act of June 3, 1937, P.L. 1333, 25 P.S. §2601 et seq.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • North Tower Condominium Ass'n v. Harrisburg Zoning Hearing Board

    19 Pa. D. & C.3d 696 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Feb 17, 1981

    Findings of fact and conclusions of the board were not filed until October 9, 1980. The case of A.Z.J.Z., Inc. v. Township of Springfield, 36 Pa. … This conclusion is premised upon the extensive discussion of Pennsylvania case law on special exceptions found in Bray v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment, 48 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis & Clark Community College v. State of Illinois, Board of Vocational Education & Rehabilitation

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 509 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 14, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • In re Acquiring Title, Eighteenth Avenue between Forty-Seventh & Forty-Eighth Streets

    121 Misc. 645 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1923

    The court has power to review the action of the board or officer authorized to examine and audit the accounts. … McCabe v. Matthies, 179 N. Y.-242; People ex rel. Myers v. Barnes, 114 id. 317; People ex rel. Brown v. Board of Apportionment & Audit, 52 id. 224.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dennis & Williams v. Ludlow

    2 Cai. Cas. 111 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1804

    Because the time of sailing was when the vessel broke ground at Savannah, with her clearance, - cargo, *and papers on board; 2. Because in fact, she went to sea on the 30th September; 3. … As to the inception of the voyage (see Henshaw v. Mar. Ins. Co., post, 274,) by sailing from the port of'Savannah, or from Oockspur; this will depend on the quo animo, or bona fide intent of the party.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • J&R's Smokehouse Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    15 Pa. D. & C.4th 510 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · Apr 24, 1991

    Steel Co. v. Allegheny County, 369 Pa. 423 , 86 A.2d 838 (1952). … As to that type of action by the board, we agree that the legislature has evidenced an intent to implement a 30-day appeal period.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education, Peru Central School District v. Stephney

    9 Misc. 3d 927 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 6, 2005

    Hampton Union Free School Dist. v Yusko, 269 AD2d 445 [2d Dept 2000]). … . of Teachers, Local 2, AFT, *933 AFL-CIO v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 1 NY3d 72, 81 [2003]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Martin v. Earle

    47 How. Pr. 458 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1873

    Brown agt. Green [MSS.], general term of November, 1874). … Brown agt. Green [MSS.], general term decision). Comstock, J., in People agt. Flagg ( 17 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • St. Joseph's Hospital v. Board of Revision of Taxes

    57 Pa. D. & C.2d 185 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · May 5, 1971

    Joseph’s Hospital (herein hospital), Sixteenth and Girard Avenue, Philadelphia, from a decision and assessment for real estate taxes of the Board of Revision of Taxes of Philadelphia. … Concededly, the fact that the parking lot is not contiguous to the hospital does not determine the issue: Allegheny General Hospital v. Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment etc., 207 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tohickon Creek Associates v. Richland Twp. Board of Supervisors

    50 Pa. D. & C.3d 563 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Mar 15, 1988

    Eckert v. Buckley, 23 Pa. Commw. 82 , 350 A.2d 417 (1976); Suburban Group Inc. v. Gittings, 22 Pa. Commw. 295 , 348 A.2d 490 (1975); Board of Supervisors of North Coventry Township v. Silverfox Corporation, 10 Pa. … Likewise, Pace Resources v. Shrewsbury Township Planning Commission and Shrewsbury Township Board of Supervisors, 89 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Weber

    30 Ohio Law Rep. 95 · Scioto County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 29, 1965

    On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. Report confirmed and respondent suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period. Taft, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Titus v. Board of Police of the Metropolitan Police District

    35 Barb. 535 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1861

    These inconsistent employments may have consisted in observing obedience to the authority of the old board of police, and acting in hostility to the new, during a certain period after the new act was passed. … If the facts, in respect to the employments referred to, are of such a nature that removal from office ought to follow, it will still be within the power of the board to cause it to be immediately done.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dickinson College v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals

    45 Pa. D. & C.3d 97 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Mar 31, 1987

    Y.M.C.A. of Germantown v. Philadelphia, 323 Pa. 401 , 187 Atl. 204 (1936). … In City of Pittsburgh v. Co. of Allegheny, et al, 50 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bensalem Township Citizens Club v. Pa. Liquor Control Board

    37 Pa. D. & C.3d 312 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Nov 27, 1985

    Accord, Carverhouse Liquor License Case, 454 Pa. 38 , 310 A.2d 81 (1973), and Commonwealth v. M.S.G., Inc., 7 Pa. Commw. 540 , 297 A.2d 556 (1972). … Commonwealth v. Eclectic Enterprises, Inc., 76 Pa. Commw. 626 , 464 A.2d 683 (1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Penn Valley Resorts, Inc. v. Pa. Liquor Control Board

    33 Pa. D. & C.3d 587 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Potter County · Jan 24, 1985

    jurisdiction which is brought about by litigation between the same parties, or their privies, on the same cause of action in the same or another court, as long as it remains unreversed, un-vacated, or annulled, Commonwealth v. … It would appear that had the board in the first instance revoked the license of Penn Valley Resorts, Inc. forevermore, this would have been most appropriate, but the board did not do so.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    71 Pa. D. & C.2d 622 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Jan 26, 1976

    Zoning Board of Adjustment of Montgomery Township, supra, and Norate Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra. … See Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 425 Pa. 43 , 228 A.2d 169 (1967) by the use of a variance proceeding: Robin Corp. v. Board of Supervisors of Lower Paxton Township, 17 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • R & L Development Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals

    20 Pa. D. & C.3d 774 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County · Dec 10, 1980

    The board may change the assessed value whenever there is an addition to the property. … The board chose to put this information on the tax card in its own unique way, but neither party has been harmed by this. The board is assessing coal, no matter what they call it on the card.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.