Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.52s

  • Village of Liverpool v. Town of Salina Planning Board

    13 Misc. 3d 732 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2006

    In its petition, the Village challenges the adequacy of the review conducted by the Planning Board under SEQRA and the resultant statement of findings issued by the Planning Board. … (See Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk, 77 NY2d 761 [1991].)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. Schmidt

    128 Misc. 377 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1926

    Brown, J. By an order of this court granted February 23,1926, and affirmed by the Appellate Division June 29, 1926 ( 217 App. … ; that the finance committee of the board of supervisors did not report that such position be abolished; that the board of • supervisors, in its budget" for the year 1926, omitted providing for petitioner’s salary and made

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • King v. City of Brooklyn

    42 Barb. 627 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1864

    It is assumed that the water commissioners were the 1 defendants' agents, upon the authority of Bailey v. The Mayor &c., in the case of Clark v. The Mayor &c. (3 Barb. S. C. … Brown, Lott, Scrugham and J. B. Barnard, Justices.]

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Guilford Water Authority v. Adams County Board of Assessment Appeals

    1 Pa. D. & C.4th 560 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County · Apr 5, 1989

    water supply. (6) Petitioner’s proposed use of the site has changed from a reservoir to a well field site. (7) On July 20, 1988, petitioner filed an application for real estate tax exemptions with respondent, Adams County Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis & Clark Community College v. State of Illinois, Board of Vocational Education & Rehabilitation

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 509 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 14, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • WXIII/Oxford-DTC Real Estate, L.L.C. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

    64 Va. Cir. 317 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Apr 5, 2004

    Board of Sup. v. Telecommunications Industries, 246 Va. 472, 475 (1993). If error is found in the assessment, then the presumption is rebutted and this Court may order that the assessment be corrected under Va. … See Board of Supervisors v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Town of Hempstead v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

    92 Misc. 616 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1915

    Town of Hempstead v. Tax Commissioners, 163 App. … Pursuant to this stipulation such an order was entered by said board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Myers v. West Virginia Department of Highways

    9 Ct. Cl. 268 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1973

    Brown, owners of property on Harrison Avenue Extension (Norton Road), a State controlled highway in Elkins, West Virginia, alleged destruction by fire of an outbuilding and its contents, numerous trees, and shrubbery, resulting

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of National Missions of the Presbyterian Church v. Borough Asphalt Co.

    177 Misc. 260 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1941

    (Gray v. Richmond Bicycle Co., 167 N. Y. 348 . See, also, Hellstern v. Hellstern, 279 id. 327, 333.) … Co. v. Mayor, 108 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Supervisors of Chenango v. Birdsall

    4 Wend. 453 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1830

    The idea that one' board of supervisors may rejudge the matters passed upon by a former board is not to be tolerated; though there has been a succession of members, the board of supervisors of Chenango in 1828 is the same … body to all legal effects as that which was assembled in 1815 or 1816, and the board of 1828 are as much bound by the acts of a preceding board as if the same natural persons constituted the board at the two distinct periods

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McCune v. Board of Police for the Metropolitan Police District

    26 Barb. 487 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1858

    In the case of Rex v. … the act of 1857, by the new board of police, for not reporting himself for duty to them, or for disobedience of any other supervisory order or regulation the board were authorized to make.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Westbury Union Free School District v. Amityville Union Free School District

    106 Misc. 2d 189 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1980

    Regrettably, the statute at bar, section 3202 (subd 5, par a) of the Education Law, has given rise to litigation between school districts, a fact on which we previously commented in Matter of Brown v Union Free School Dist … ” (see, also, Matter of Board of Educ. of Yorktown Cent.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kuhlbarsch v. Sauter

    170 Misc. 955 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1939

    (See, also, Decker v. Decker, 108 N. Y. 128 .) In the instant case plaintiff received her board and room in part payment for and as a result of her own labor. … (See, also, Brown v. Brown, 266 N. Y. 532 .) The evidence is to the effect that defendant was not aware of the conveyance made to her by the deceased until its recordation and delivery to her by mail.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Hall's Furniture Store, Inc.

    78 Pa. D. & C. 241 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jun 11, 1951

    The decision of the majority of the board must be treated as the decision of the board: Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co, et al. v. United States et al., 298 U. S. 349 , *248 National Labor Relations Board v. … Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra, and Oughton et al. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Clearfield Dry Goods, Inc.

    76 Pa. D. & C. 531 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County · Sep 1, 1951

    L. 1168, establishes the board as the fact-finding body. … The only question for the court to determine is whether the findings of fact made by the board are supported by substantial and legally credible evidence: Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Daum, 365 Pa. 285 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Flynn

    65 Misc. 233 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1909

    Williams v. Zucker, 36 Misc. Rep. 260 ; People ex rel. Whitman v. Goldenkranz, 38 id. 682. … Jarvis v. Waterbury, 84 Hun, 462 ; Brown v. Woodruff, 32 N. Y. 361 . Irrespective of the question whether Dr. Strong was holding under a valid appointment at the time of his resignation, the appointment of Dr.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Western Investment, LLC v. Deutsche Multi-Market Income Trust

    34 Mass. L. Rptr. 95 · Massachusetts Superior Court, Suffolk County · Feb 6, 2017

    See Harhen v. Brown, 431 Mass. 838, 839-40 (2000), citing Shaw v. Digital Equip. Corp., 82 F.3d 1194, 1220 (1st Cir. 1996); Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd., 442 Mass. 43 , 45 n.4 (2004). … Harhen v. Brown, 431 Mass. 838 , 843 n.5 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Simco Sales Service of Penna., Inc. v. Board of Health

    42 Pa. D. & C. 139 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Apr 18, 1941

    Dyer Quarry Co., 250 Pa. 589 ; Commonwealth v. … In this case, the court quoted with approval from Parrott & Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Kidd v. Commissioners of Excise

    25 N.Y.S. 873 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1893

    BROWN, J. … People v. Board of Police, 69 N. Y. 408 ; People v. Board of Fire Com’rs, 100 N. Y. 82 , 2 N. E. Rep. 613.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dickinson College v. Cumberland County Board of Assessment Appeals

    45 Pa. D. & C.3d 97 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Mar 31, 1987

    Y.M.C.A. of Germantown v. Philadelphia, 323 Pa. 401 , 187 Atl. 204 (1936). … In City of Pittsburgh v. Co. of Allegheny, et al, 50 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.