Case law

Jamestown Sterling Corp. v. United Furniture Workers of America

31 Misc. 2d 969 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1961

Brown was persuaded not to cross the picket line and they denied that force was used to restrain her. … (Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U. S. 88 [1940]; see Drivers Union v. Meadowmoor Co., 312 U. S. 287 [1941]; Thomas v. Collins, 323 U. S. 516 [1944].)

Manayunk Neighborhood Council Inc. v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

42 Pa. D. & C.5th 359 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 19, 2014

Lewis v. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 542 A.2d 519, 522 (Pa. 1988); Kosanovich v. Retirement Bd. of Allegheny Cnty., 724 A.2d 420 n. 1 (Pa. Cmwlth. Ct. 1999) (same); see also Banks v. Civil Serv. … The ZBA “as fact finder is the ultimate judge of credibility and resolves all conflicts in the evidence,” Eichlin v. New Home Boro. Zoning Board, 679 A.2d 1173 , 1175 (Pa. Cmwlth.

Merchandise Reporting Co. v. L. Oransky & Sons

133 Misc. 890 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jul 1, 1929

That case was decided before Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co. ( 260 U. … Since the decision in Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.

Hendrix v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 230 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Feb 14, 1974

These powers establish the Board of Trustees as the principal and the S.I.U. counselors, employed by the Board, as its agents and not agents of the State. "The principal is the source of power in an agency.” Fredrick v. … Murray v. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 339; Hansen v. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 102; Stedman v. State of Illinois, 22 C.C.R. 446; Kamin v. State of Illinois, 21 C.C.R. 467; Finn v.

Schmeider v. McLane

36 Barb. 495 · New York Supreme Court · May 12, 1862

By the Court, Brown, J. … Emcrtt, Brown, Scrugham and Lott, Justices.] The judgment should he affirmed.

People ex rel. Schaurer v. Smith

81 Misc. 2d 1039 · New York County Courts · Apr 29, 1975

It would also appear that they are ignoring a *1042 Federal decision in which the parole board was the defendant (United States ex rel. Johnson v Chairman of N. Y. … This has been modified in part by Matter of Browne v New York State Bd. of Parole ( 10 NY2d 116 ), holding that on a question of law a parole decision is reviewable by the courts.

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Holland Laundry, Inc.

180 Misc. 1031 · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 1943

(said by the Board to be a “ Balleisen contract,” condemned in National Licorice Co. v. … State Labor Relations Bd. v. Timen, 264 App. Div. 120 ; Stork Restaurant, Inc., v. Boland, 282 N. Y. 256 ; National Labor Relations Bd. v. P. Lorillard Co., 314 U. S. 512 .)

People ex rel. Post v. Board of Supervisors of the County of Ontario

4 Denio 260 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1847

V.) 4. Search warrants, and proceedings thereon. (2 R. S. 746, § 25 to 28.) III. … As the board did not in all respects act in accordance with the results at which we have arrived, a mandamus is ordered. Motion granted.

State ex rel. Hunt v. Board of County Commissioners

8 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 281 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Mar 15, 1909

The Mayor, etc., 24 Barb. 226 ; Clough and Wheat v. Hart et al, 8 Kas., 487 ; Frederick v. Douglas County, 96 Wis., 411 ; Brome v. Cuming County, 33 Neb., 362 ; Waters et al v. Trovillo, 47 Kas., 197 ; Commissioners v. … Such counsel shall be the legal adviser of the board of county commissioners and of all other county officers, of the annual county board of equalization, the decennial county board of equalization, the decennial county board

Board of Education of the School District v. Eshelby

6 Ohio N.P. 117 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jul 1, 1898

“His salary is compensation for performing all the duties of his office. ” Judge Force in Knorr v. Board of Education, 9 Bull. 182. … (Egerton v. Brownlow, 4 H. L. Cases, 1.) Ellis G. Kinkead, for the Board of' Education. Frederick Hertenstein, for the Defendant.

People ex rel. Erie Railroad Co. v. Board of Supervisors

51 Misc. 200 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1906

A motion is now made for a peremptory writ of mandamus, directing the board of supervisors to audit and pay to relator this claim for school and highway taxes. … Co. v. Matthias, 84 App. Div. 122 , for the school and highway tax refund, which case had not been decided at the time the State, county and town taxes were refunded by the board. The law has in no way changed.

Mills v. City of New York

189 Misc. 291 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1947

In support of this contention Trustees of Canandaigua v. Foster ( 156 N. Y. 354 ), Toth v. Kennedy & Smith, Inc. ( 259 App. Div. 855 ), and Nickelsburg v. City of New York ( 263 App. Div. 625 ) are cited. … Co. v. Macon R., etc., Co., 9 Ga.

Kirkpatrick Home for Childless Women v. Kenyon

119 Misc. 349 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1922

Brown, J. Defendant’s testatrix entered the home of the plaintiff August 16, 1920. … In Arming v. Steinway, 35 Misc.

Karasz v. Wallace

134 Misc. 2d 1052 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1987

Brown, J. … (Tango v Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34, 41 .) Discretion involves a 'latitude of choice within certain legal bounds’ (Webster’s Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, p 238 [1970]).”

Goldenberg v. Bartell Broadcasting Corp.

47 Misc. 2d 105 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1965

In a doubtful case one must at his peril acquaint himself with the exact extent of the officer’s authority (Traitel Marble Co. v. Brown Bros., 159 App. Div. 485 ). … As stated by the court in the case of Traitel Marble Co. v. Brown Bros. ( 159 App.

Sheeler v. Local No. 107, United Food Workers Industrial Union

57 Pa. D. & C. 595 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 8, 1945

Subsequent to the execution of the aforementioned cards the executive board of the United Automobile Workers Union, C. … However, the executive board of the United Automobile Workers Union, C. I.

Martens v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University

35 Ill. Ct. Cl. 80 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Oct 29, 1981

(William v. Wiewel (1976), 36 Ill. App. 3d 478 , 344 N.E.2d 34 .) It is undisputed that Claimant was an invitee of Respondent. … (Mancha v. Field Museum of Natural History (1972), 5 Ill. App. 3d 699 , 283 N.E.2d 829 .)

Chapman v. International Business Machines Corp.

176 Misc. 2d 661 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1998

In Brown v Christopher St. Owners Corp. … In Bermel v Board of Educ. ( 231 AD2d 663 [2d Dept 1996]), plaintiff, employed as a school custodian, was changing light bulbs and cleaning the light fixtures in a school auditorium, when the scaffold upon which he was standing

People v. Klas

29 N.Y. Crim. 177 · New York County Courts · Feb 15, 1913

Brown v. Treat & Carter, 1 Hill, 225, case of mingling counts in contract and tort. Miller v. Scherder, 2 N. Y. 262, also a case of mingling or uniting causes of action in contract and tort. … Hutchinson v. Davis, 58 Ill. App. 358 . And refusal to pay damages for a breach of a contract to board does not come within the statute; only refusal to pay for board actually furnished. Sudmacher v. Block, 39 Ill.

Rice v. Maddock

9 N.Y.S. 524 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 7, 1890

The referee found that in November, 1869, Rice became a partner of the defendant and one Browning in conducting the business of a Russian bath and boarding establishment; that in the same month Browning withdrew, and Rice … and the defendant continued the business thereafter, but that prior to April 26, 1874, Rice had drawn out of or received from the business, including certain ■charges for board made in the ledger against him, an amount equal