Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

1.16s

  • Tinsley v. Monserrat

    61 Misc. 2d 599 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1970

    The respondent Board of Education caused to be published a proposed plan for the Borough of Manhattan. … The result is contrary to developing trends in this complex area and in violation of the principles enunciated in Brown v. Board of Educ. ( 347 U. S. 483 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hogle v. Industrial Commission

    23 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 241 · Knox County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1921

    Brown, in which he quotes Dr. Brown as saying that the loss of plaintiff’s eyesight “is not related to the injury.” … Brown’s report we do not feel that the claim should be approved from a medical standpoint. Recommendation: Payment of account as rendered by Dr. Brown in the amount of $10. “ T. R. Fletcher, “Chief Medical Division.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Board of Trustees of the Buffalo Police Pension Fund

    130 Misc. 204 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1927

    The board of police laid the recommendation upon the table until its next meeting, and the petitioner notified, so that he might take such action, as he saw fit. … The matter of a pension for total instead of partial disability *207 has never been submitted to the said board, of trustees, and consequently has never been acted upon.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Springsted v. Board of Trustees of Cobleskill

    20 N.Y.S. 920 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1892

    The order awarding a writ of certiorari, from which the appeal is taken, was not granted within four months after the assessment sought to be reviewed was confirmed and levied by the board of trustees of the village of Cobleskill … This is, not an open question, In People v. Hildreth, 126 N. Y. 360 , 27 N. E. Rep. 558, the question of jurisdiction was raised, as will be seen by examining the points of counsel.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nuara v. State of New York Workers' Compensation Board

    43 Misc. 3d 425 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 2010

    In Held v Workers’ Compensation Bd. … Roth, 99 NY2d 316, 322 [2003]; Seittelman v Sabol, 91 NY2d 618, 625 [1998]; Kurcsics v Merchants Mut.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Jenkins

    36 Va. Cir. 287 · Roanoke County Circuit Court · May 3, 1995

    “Where the language in an ordinance or statute is plain and unambiguous, it must be given that plain meaning or intent Brown v. Lukhard, 229 Va. 316, 321 , 330 S.E.2d 84, 87 (1985).” … Board of Supervisors of Fauquier County v. Machinick, 242 Va. 452, 456 , 410 S.E.2d 607 (1991).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Managers of the Mews at North Hills Condominium v. Farajzadeh

    185 Misc. 2d 353 · Nassau County District Court · Mar 31, 2000

    (Frisch v Bellmarc Mgt., 190 AD2d 383 [1st Dept 1993]; accord, Board of Mgrs. v Baker, 244 AD2d 229 [1st Dept 1997].) … (Board of Mgrs. v Jagwani, 250 AD2d 717 [2d Dept 1998]; Rivermist Assn. v Davis, 251 AD2d 1039 [4th Dept 1998].)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. City of Lockport v. Board of Supervisors

    50 How. Pr. 353 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1874

    All actions against counties must be brought against the board of supervisors thereof (2 Rev. Stat., 473, sec. 95; 1 id., 364). … It is strictly an action against the county as a municipal corporation, prosecuted in the manner specially directed by statute, in which the board of supervisors is named defendant. The board is not an officer.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Babbitt v. Board of Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments

    41 How. Pr. 459 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

    The Board of Education of Lockport, *470 ( 46 Barb., 588 ), which may be cited as authority for the action of the respondents in this case, and which, therefore,, demands some consideration here. … V. The case which is made by the relator commends itself to the court, as one presented in good faith.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bull Run Civic Ass'n. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    7 Va. Cir. 201 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Oct 25, 1983

    Board of Supervisors, etc. v. Southland Corporation, 224 Va. 514 (1982); Bell v. City Council of City of Charlottesville, 224 Va. 490 *209 (1982). … Knowlton v. Browning Ferris, 220 Va. 571 (1979); Pushnik v. Hempfield Township, 402 A.2d 318 (1979).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joanette Juniors, Inc. v. Board of Home Missions of Congregational & Christian Churches

    197 Misc. 291 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1949

    [d]) failed because plaintiff’s removal as a result of defendant’s notification was held not to be an eviction of plaintiff within the meaning of these laws (Joanette Jumors v. Board of Home Missions, 273 App. … But the complaint in this action has been adjudged sufficient as alleging the familiar common law action for damages for fraud and deceit (Joanette Juniors v. Board of Home Missions, N. Y. L.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Groton Bridge Manuf'g Co. v. Town Board

    36 N.Y.S. 1062 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1895

    The resolution was signed by the members of the town board. … The resolution of the board was unquestionably sufficient to authorize the commissioner to construct a new bridge* People v. Smith, 83 Hun, 432 , 31 N. Y. Supp. 746 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Zayre of Ohio, Inc.

    41 Ohio Misc. 117 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Aug 2, 1974

    Brown, v. Andrew Palzes, Inc. (Com. Pleas, Cuyahoga County 1973), 1973-2 Trade Cases, Para. 74,764, at 95,329. … In Plymouth Dealers’ Assn. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Warren Sanitary Milk Co. v. Board of Review, Bureau of Unemployment Compensation

    87 Ohio Law. Abs. 195 · Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 16, 1961

    Co. v. Jarman, 187 U. S., 197 , 47 L. Ed., 139 ; State, ex rel. Weinberger, v. Miller, 87 Ohio St., 12 ; State, ex rel. Board, v. Dunn, 82 Ohio Law Abs., 102 , as affirmed, 110 *205 Ohio App., 329 ; Chambers v. … See Davidson v. Board of Reviews, 189 Pa. Super., 543, 151 A. (2d), 870. But this is not what the Board did!

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cooper v. Cooper

    6 Ohio N.P. 99 · Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 15, 1898

    Welsh v. Welsh, 5 Ohio, 425; Wells v. Bannister, 4 Mass., 514 ; Brown’s Stat. Frauds, sec. 119. … Thomas v. Brown, 10 Ohio St., 247 ; Neales v. Neales, 9 Wall. 1 , Book 19, 5-90; Bigelow v. Armes, 108 Ohio St., 10 , Book 47, 636; Brown v. Sutton, 129. U. S., 238, Book 32, 664.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Eckerson v. Board of Trustees of Haverstraw

    20 N.Y.S. 7 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1892

    People v. Commissioners, 13 Wend. 310 . The jury to assess the damages were properly obtained. … Such proof is justified by the ease of Baldwin v. City of Buffalo, 35 N. Y. 375 . It was unimportant whether or not the president of the trustees directed a fence to be built along a part of the premises in dispute.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnsen v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University

    47 Ill. Ct. Cl. 261 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jan 13, 1995

    (Leonida v. State (1979), 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 125 .) … (Umbaugh v. Board of Trustees of SIU (1985), 37 Ill. Ct. Cl. 151 .) Because of our decision on wrongful discharge, we need not reach the issue of lack of mitigation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Benchmark Cleaning & Supply, Inc.

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 17, 2012

    VELVET BROWN, Plaintiff v. … Watt v. Unifirst Corp., 2009 ME 47 ~ 22, 969 A.2d 897, 902.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • M. & M. Stone Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Lower Salford Township

    16 Pa. D. & C.2d 584 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Jul 1, 1958

    This result could not have been intended”: Cheswick Borough v. Bechman, 352 Pa. 79, 82 (1945). See also Humphreys v. Stuart Realty Corporation, 364 Pa. 616, at 621 (1950) ; Firth v. … Co., Inc. v. Board of Appeals, 324 Mass. 433, 436 , 86 N. E. 2d 906, 909 (1949).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Community School District No. 29 v. Board of Education of the City School District

    107 Misc. 2d 11 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1980

    No. 22 v Board of Educ., 44 AD2d 713 .) The court may not direct the Chancellor to accept the plan as submitted by the local school board. … Assn, v Board of Educ., 39 NY2d 111 .) In this case, the court is not presuming to dispute the exercise of educational policy in behalf of the Chancellor.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.