Case law

Hogle v. Industrial Commission

23 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 241 · Knox County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1921

Brown, in which he quotes Dr. Brown as saying that the loss of plaintiff’s eyesight “is not related to the injury.” … Brown’s report we do not feel that the claim should be approved from a medical standpoint. Recommendation: Payment of account as rendered by Dr. Brown in the amount of $10. “ T. R. Fletcher, “Chief Medical Division.”

People ex rel. Benner v. Board of Supervisors

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 442 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1886

The power upon the part of the attorney general to employ special counsel in a case like this was not passed upon by the Court of Appeals in Attorney General v. Continental Life Insurance Company ( 88 N. Y., 571 ).

New York & Harlem Railroad v. Board of Trustees

14 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 652 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1876

(Owners of Lands v. The Mayor, 15 Wend., 374 .) This rule was followed in this court in the case of The Village of Sing Sing v. The Mayor of New York, where a road was laid out over the Croton aqueduct. … There is a marked difference in this lease and that described in Marsh v. The City of Brooklyn ( 59 N. Y., 280 ).

People ex rel. Babbitt v. Board of Commissioners of Taxes & Assessments

41 How. Pr. 459 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

The Board of Education of Lockport, *470 ( 46 Barb., 588 ), which may be cited as authority for the action of the respondents in this case, and which, therefore,, demands some consideration here. … V. The case which is made by the relator commends itself to the court, as one presented in good faith.

Burnett v. Snyder

13 Jones & S. 582 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 3, 1879

People ex rel. Burhans v. Board of Supervisors

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 607 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

It was now the duty of the board to take them up and pass upon them, item by item (People ex rel. Thurston v. Town Auditors, 82 N. … Thomson v.

People ex rel. Rorke v. Board of Assessors

39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 457 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

.: The order made at Special Term necessarily resulted from the principle established in Chegaray v. The Mayor ( 13 N. Y., 220 ). … The present •is a case where the owners of land leased to the board of education a house for school purposes, and it has in point of fact been used for a public school.

People ex rel. Everett v. Board of Supervisors

36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 185 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1883

Van Keuren v. Auditors, 74 N. Y., 311 ; Laws 1880, chap. 554; 2 R. S., m. p. 474, § 102, etc.) The judgment is to be collected from the commissioners (2 R. … We cannbt determine whether or not these commissioners will have any claim against the town upon their accounting. *186 There is nothing in the remark to which we are referred, made in Van Alstyne v. Freday ( 41 N.

Wickham v. Coyner

20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 765 · Delaware Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1892

“In Bell v. Kennedy, L. R. 1, H. … Bruce v. Bruce, 2 Bos. & Pul. N. R. 228; Sears v. Boston, 42 Mass. (1 Metc.) 250.

People ex rel. Robison v. Board of Supervisors

24 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 501 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1879

(Hayes v. Symonds, 9 Barb., 260 ; Smith v. People, 47 N. Y., 330 ; The A. B. and C. Co. v. N. L. Company, 53 id., 123; Mongeon v. People, 55 id., 613.) … (People v. Halsey, 37 N. Y., 348 ; People ex rel. Waller v. Supervisors of Sullivan County, 56 id., 250.)

Claim of Peterson v. City of New York

73 Misc. 2d 618 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1973

Leo Brown, J. This is a motion to permit late filing of a notice of claim against the Board of Education of the City of New York pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. … In these circumstances, it is clear, that there was a cognizable relationship between the infancy and the failure to serve a timely notice of claim on the Board of Education". (Kern v. Central Free School Dist.

People ex rel. Funke v. Board of Excise

31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 195 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1881

(People v. Supervisors, 51 N. Y., 442, 446 ; People ex rel. Beller v. Dwight, 3 Hun, 306 .) … Even if the court had the power to cause the board to act again upon the complaint, it could not prescribe the decision which they should make.

Cooper Communities, Inc. v. Fauquier County Board of Supervisors

37 Va. Cir. 31 · Fauquier County Circuit Court · Feb 21, 1995

Board of Supervisors v. Telecommunications Industries, 246 Va. 472, 475 (1993). … Board of Supervisors v. Donatelli & Klein, 228 Va. 620, 627 (1985).

Washington v. Dunn

15 Misc. 2d 765 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1958

(Thomas v. Musical Mut. Protective Union, 121 N. Y. 45, 52 ; Kane v. Walsh, 295 N. Y. 198, 206-207 .) … (Rose v. Brown, 186 Misc. 553 .) This the petitioners here have failed to do.

People ex rel. McKenzie v. Board of Supervisors

26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 11 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1879

The board having acted in the matter and determined the question, a mandamus will not lie to compel a reversal of their judgment. (The People ex rel. Opdyke, Mayor, etc., v. … Brennan, Comptroller, etc., 39 Barb., 651 ; Francis v. Common Council of Troy, 20 Alb. L. J., 269.) The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Talcott, P.

Hamilton v. New York State Division of Parole

36 Misc. 3d 440 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2012

Executive Law § 259-i (2) (c) sets forth the factors that the Parole Board must consider in evaluating discretionary parole requests (see Matter of Wan Zhang v Travis, 10 AD3d 828, 829 [3d Dept 2004]). … Petitioner also argues that the Board’s decision amounts to an unauthorized resentencing. This argument is without merit (see Matter of Marsh v New York State Div. of Parole, 31 AD3d 898 [3d Dept 2006]).

People ex rel. Lawrence v. Board of Supervisors

18 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 306 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1877

Law, [2d ed.], 104 et. seq.; People v. Devlin, 33 N. Y., 273 ; Roosevelt v, Godard, 52 Barb., 534 .) … (Supervisors v. Wandel, 6 Lans., 33 ; Supervisors v. Ellis, 59 N. Y., 620 .)

People ex rel. Bahn v. Board of Supervisors

16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 440 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

His account was an ordinary county charge — necessarily to be audited and passed upon by the board of supervisors. … Johnson v. Delaware Supervisors ( 45 N. Y., 196 ); The People v. Otsego Supervisors (51 id., 401), and the order directing such writ to issue, was correct and should be affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed.

Loudoun County Board of Supervisors v. Vanguard Ltd. Partnership

35 Va. Cir. 254 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Dec 1, 1994

As the Court noted in Resolution Trust Co. v. … F.D.I.C. v. Newhart, 713 F. Supp. 320 (W.D. Missouri 1989).

People ex rel. Williams v. Board of Assessors

9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

Marsh v. … People v. Supervisors of Allegany, 15 Wend., 198 ; People ex rel. Marsh v. Delaney, 49 N. Y., 655 .