Case law

Wise v. Brown

6 Pa. D. & C.2d 684 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County · Jan 9, 1956

Clyde Brown. Mr. Brown, the county treasurer, refused to sign this cheek which was made out to J. Mark Good, postmaster, in the amount of $10. The contention of Mr. … Brown is that section 1-1762 (c), and section 1-1764 of the same county code are irreconcilable with the section of the county code above quoted, and that therefor the latter two sections prevail.

Brown v. Longbottom

1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 161 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jan 26, 1903

Brown v. Cresko

71 Pa. D. & C. 200 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County · Oct 18, 1949

Brown of the City of Wilkes-Barre, for the sum of $59.47, for merchandise sold and delivered, copy of plaintiff’s books of original entry being marked Exhibit “A” and attached to plaintiff’s complaint. … Salesmen have no authority to collect money or incur any indebtedness on behalf of Brown & Bigelow. . . .” We, therefore, conclude the counterclaim to be defective.

Stephens v. Brown

2 Miles 244 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Sep 28, 1838

Harris v. Brown

3 Pa. D. & C. 684 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Apr 14, 1923

Brown v. Pollock

17 Pa. D. & C. 631 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Dec 29, 1931

action located in this county; that a contract was entered into between plaintiff and defendant some time in the month of April, 1931, for a baseball game to be played at Forbes Field, in the City of Pittsburgh, Pa., by the Brown

Brown v. Boardman

33 Pa. D. & C. 581 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Sep 7, 1938

Brown, the above plaintiff, is engaged in the business of selling liquid fuels at Amity Hall and Dauphin, Pa. Subsequent to the effective date of the Act of June 2,1937, P. … Discussion We feel that there is very little difference between this case and the case of The Sperry & Hutchinson Company et al. v.

Lauer v. Brown

30 Barb. 416 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1859

Brown v. Jewett

18 N.H. 230 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Jul 15, 1846

Rep. 191 , Smith v. Knowlton. If the plaintiff had objected that the evidence on the part of the defendant was insufficient to raise a presumption of the death of the husband, the exception would have been well taken.

Watson v. Brown

8 Ohio N.P. 330 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jul 1, 1901

Shipp v. Brown

20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 223 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1916

Caldwell v. Brown

11 Ohio C.C. 485 · Lucas Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1896

Did the defendant employ Burt Brown, the son of the plaintiff? A. Yes. 2. … What amount, if anything, is due the plaintiff for work and labor of the defendant’s son Byron Brown, for work other than that done upon the house mentioned in the answer and cross-petition, and called during the trial the

Brown v. Ricketts

17 Ohio C.C. Dec. 269 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Feb 20, 1905

Brown, he rendered professional services to Frank Brown, a son of the defendant, and that the fair value of such services is $780. … V. & T. Ry. v. Gaffney, 65 Ohio St. 104 [61 N. E.

Brown v. Farr

25 Ohio C.C. Dec. 466 · Lucas Circuit Court · Feb 10, 1912

Brown upon two causes of action set forth in her petition. In the first cause of action she claimed a balance of $5.50 upon a promissory note executed by Brown to her. … See Jackson v. Ely, 57 Ohio St. 450 [49 N. E. Rep. 792] ; Cassilly v. Cassilly, 57 Ohio St. 582 [49 N. E. Rep. 795].

Longden v. Brown

1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 338 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 15, 1885

On receiving this, defendant’s attorney took an order to show cause why plaintiffs should not give a further bill of particulars specifying thereon the number of each piece of goods sold to the firm of Lowry & Brown.

Bagley v. Brown

3 E.D. Smith 66 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1854

Irwin v. Brown

26 Jones & S. 585 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 27, 1890

Brown v. Hardie

5 Rob. 678 · The Superior Court of New York City · May 6, 1867

It would have been error in the judgment, as it originally stood, unless modified, (Dwight v. Enos, 5 Seld. 470; Fitzhugh v.

Brown v. Georgi

56 N.Y.S. 851 · City of New York Municipal Court · May 27, 1898

In Hepburn v.

Tuckerman v. Brown

23 How. Pr. 109 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1862

And after the company is organized, a committee first reduce it to $50, and then the board return the note, without any assessment having ever been made upon it, or any portion of it whatever having been paid. … Brown, decided at the general term in the sixth district, and reported in 11th Abb., 389.