Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.44s
Board of Commissioners of Charities & Corrections v. Hammill
40 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 348 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1884
(Toles v. Adee, 84 N. Y., 222 ; Cook v. Freudenthal, 80 id., 202.) The surety can only be held for the penalty of a bond, and if the proper penalty had been inserted in this bond the recovery would exceed it. … (Kelly v. McCormick, 28 N. Y., 318 ; People ex rel. Fiedler v. Mead, 24 id., 114.) The excess of the penalty of the bond beyond the order requires a reversal of the judgment.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York Infant Asylum v. Board of Supervisors
38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 116 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883
(Hebrew Orphan Asylum v. The Mayor, 11 Hun, 116 .) … Bank of Chemung v. City of Elmira, 53 N. Y., 49 .)
Cited 0 timesPublished25 Pa. D. & C.2d 461 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County · Mar 22, 1961
Brown from the tax assessment for 1959, as fixed by order of the Warren County Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes on July 23,1959, following *462 appeals to said board, for 20 acres of land in Freehold Township, Warren … Brown from the Tax Assessment identified on his property record card as YV-1-8286, being 20 acres of land in Freehold Township, Warren County, *464 for the year 1959, be and it is hereby sustained, and said assessment is
Cited 1 timesPublishedAmerican PCS, L.P. v. Fairfax County Zoning Appeals Board
40 Va. Cir. 211 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jul 30, 1996
(“APC”) for a writ of certiorari requesting the Court to reverse the decision of Respondent, the Fairfax County Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”), denying APC’s application for a special permit exception to locate a monopole … See, Foster v. Geller, 248 Va. 563, 566 (1994) (citations omitted). APC’s argument that the BZA’s application of the Zoning Ordinance is unconstitutional is without merit.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Kimball v. Board of Supervisors
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 131 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1881
We are cited to The People v. The Board of Assessors ( 39 N. … Mehropolitan Police Board ( 39 N. Y., 506 ), and in The People v. Supervisors of Westchester ( 57 Barb., 377 ), and in The People v. Supervisors of Madison ( 51 N. Y., 442 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedChester v. Board of Review of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation
82 Ohio Law. Abs. 182 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Dec 1, 1959
The board relied on *184 prior board rulings “that a discharge for garnishments is a discharge for just cause in connection with work.” Secs. 4141.29 (C) (1) and 4141.30 (E) R. … In Chalker v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association et al, 71 Abs 87 ; 126 N.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMinisters & Missionaries Benefit Board of the American Baptist Convention v. McKay
64 Misc. 2d 231 · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 1970
In 1930, its purposes • and powers were extended in part and modified in part by this court, and there was due investigation, inquiry and approval thereof by the New York State Board of Charities (designated the State Board … Smith v. Campbell, 19 Ves. 400; Bennett v. Honeywood, Amb. 708.
Cited 1 timesPublished124 N.Y.S. 133 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1910
People ex rel. v. Adair, 44 Misc. Rep. 450 , 89 N. Y. Supp. 376 (opinion). … Matter of Brown, 38 Misc. Rep. 158 , 77 N. Y. Supp. 261 . The case of Raymond v. Clement, 118 App. Div. 528 , 102 N. Y.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Peoples Heritage Bank
Superior Court of Maine · Dec 28, 2000
See Tungate v. MacLean Stevens Studios, Inc., 1998 ME 162 { 13, 714 A.2d 792, 797-98 (Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act); Brae Asset Fund L.P. v. … Adam, 661 A.2d 1137, 1140 (Me. 1995) (negligent misrepresentation); Jourdain v. Dineen, 527 A.2d 1304, 1307 (Me. 1987) (fraud). In this case the Browns cannot do this for two reasons.
Cited 0 timesUnpublishedPeople ex rel. Benner v. Board of Supervisors
46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 442 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1886
The power upon the part of the attorney general to employ special counsel in a case like this was not passed upon by the Court of Appeals in Attorney General v. Continental Life Insurance Company ( 88 N. Y., 571 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew York & Harlem Railroad v. Board of Trustees
14 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 652 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1876
(Owners of Lands v. The Mayor, 15 Wend., 374 .) This rule was followed in this court in the case of The Village of Sing Sing v. The Mayor of New York, where a road was laid out over the Croton aqueduct. … There is a marked difference in this lease and that described in Marsh v. The City of Brooklyn ( 59 N. Y., 280 ).
Cited 0 timesPublished126 Misc. 2d 761 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1985
Brown, J. … (Delaware Midland Corp. v Incorporated Vil. of Westhampton Beach, 79 Misc 2d 438 , affd 48 AD2d 681 , affd 39 NY2d 1029 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedWest Chester Area School Board v. West Chester Area Education Ass'n
9 Pa. D. & C.4th 125 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · Feb 5, 1991
Liquor Control Board v. … The policy of the courts, and indeed, of our nation as a whole, ever since Brown v.
Cited 1 timesPublished13 Jones & S. 582 · The Superior Court of New York City · Mar 3, 1879
Cited 0 timesPublished20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 765 · Delaware Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1892
“In Bell v. Kennedy, L. R. 1, H. … Bruce v. Bruce, 2 Bos. & Pul. N. R. 228; Sears v. Boston, 42 Mass. (1 Metc.) 250.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Robison v. Board of Supervisors
24 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 501 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1879
(Hayes v. Symonds, 9 Barb., 260 ; Smith v. People, 47 N. Y., 330 ; The A. B. and C. Co. v. N. L. Company, 53 id., 123; Mongeon v. People, 55 id., 613.) … (People v. Halsey, 37 N. Y., 348 ; People ex rel. Waller v. Supervisors of Sullivan County, 56 id., 250.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedClaim of Peterson v. City of New York
73 Misc. 2d 618 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1973
Leo Brown, J. This is a motion to permit late filing of a notice of claim against the Board of Education of the City of New York pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. … In these circumstances, it is clear, that there was a cognizable relationship between the infancy and the failure to serve a timely notice of claim on the Board of Education". (Kern v. Central Free School Dist.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCooper Communities, Inc. v. Fauquier County Board of Supervisors
37 Va. Cir. 31 · Fauquier County Circuit Court · Feb 21, 1995
Board of Supervisors v. Telecommunications Industries, 246 Va. 472, 475 (1993). … Board of Supervisors v. Donatelli & Klein, 228 Va. 620, 627 (1985).
Cited 0 timesPublishedAl-Harbi, Inc. v. Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
40 Va. Cir. 390 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Oct 11, 1996
See Fralin v. Kozlowski, 18 Va. App. 697, 701 (1994). … See Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. Kenley, 6 Va. App. 231, 242 (1988).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. McKenzie v. Board of Supervisors
26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 11 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1879
The board having acted in the matter and determined the question, a mandamus will not lie to compel a reversal of their judgment. (The People ex rel. Opdyke, Mayor, etc., v. … Brennan, Comptroller, etc., 39 Barb., 651 ; Francis v. Common Council of Troy, 20 Alb. L. J., 269.) The order appealed from should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Talcott, P.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna