Case law

Rawson v. Springsteen

2 Thomp. & Cook 416 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1873

some of his board bills had.” … The judgment of reversal was put by the county court upon the case of Brown v. Weber, 38 N. Y. 187 , which in principle, I think, was quite like this and required such a decision.

Burdette v. Jones

47 Ohio Law. Abs. 593 · Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 30, 1947

In State v Brown, 27 N. … (See Phillips v Board of Education, 12 Oh Ap 456, and Wittenmeyer v Board of Education, 10 O. C. C. 119.)

Pleasant Excavating Co. v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

37 Va. Cir. 549 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jun 8, 1994

The decisions cited in Obenshain are Parker v. … Prince William County, 198 Va. 231 (1956) (appeal dismissed because claimant failed to execute a bond with sufficient surety until nine and one-half months after board’s initial denial of the claim); and Karara v.

BIT Processing, Inc. v. Information Technology Procurement Appeals Board

34 Va. Cir. 125 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Jun 10, 1994

In Virginia Real Estate Bd. v. Clay, 9 Va. … Virginia Real Estate Bd. v. Clay, 9 Va. App. at 161 , 384 S.E.2d at 627 . Accordingly, BIT’s argument that the University and, subsequently, the Board erred in considering CBM’s protest lacks merit.

People ex rel. Johnson v. Barrows

65 Misc. 158 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1909

Brown, J. … to pay any deficit in the board of water commissioners’ accounts.

Bell v. Quin

2 Sandf. 146 · The Superior Court of New York City · Oct 7, 1848

In direct contravention of this statute, and of his duty as a member of the board, Mr. … And in one of them, (Brown v.

Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County Board of Rules & Appeals

14 Fla. Supp. 2d 141 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Nov 4, 1985

Although recognizing that the building code provides alternative methods of compliance, the Board summarily denied Appellant’s appeal. We reverse. … Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the Board with the direction that it reverse the finding on the violation and issue to Publix the permanent certificate of occupancy.

Greenwald v. Schechter

17 Misc. 2d 611 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1959

Safeguards are provided for by appeal to the Classification Appeal Board. Over-all approval rests in the Board of Estimate, the governing body of the City of New York. … (Matter of Mandle v. Brown, 5 N Y 2d 51.)

Board of Mgrs. of Manhasset Med. Arts Condominium v. Integrated Med. Professionals, PLLC

New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 2019

Board of Managers of Manhasset Medical Arts Condominium AND 42-78/86 REALTY LLC, Plaintiffs, against Integrated Medical Professionals, PLLC, PRECISION-AIRE INC., CHUBB CUSTOM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. 612243-18 BARNES … Co. of New York v Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. , 570 F3d 513, 519 [2nd Cir]).

Bingham v. Hyland

6 N.Y.S. 75 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1889

Weaver v. Barden, 49 N. Y. 286 ; Cary v. White, 52 N. Y. 138 ; Webster v. Van Steenbergh, 46 Barb. 211 ; Westbrook v. Gleason, 79 N. Y. 23, 28 ; Yowng v. Guy, 87 N. Y. 457, 462 . … Chadwick v. Fonner, 69 N. Y. 404 , and the cases cited; Waring v.

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Budoff

12 Misc. 2d 535 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1957

By the terms of the National act it is a condition to the State board’s jurisdiction that there be a cession of such jurisdiction to the State board by the National board (Guss v. Utah Labor Bd. 353 U. … S. 1 ; Meat Cutters v. Fairlawn Meats, 353 U. S. 20 ; San Diego Unions v. Garmon, 353 U. S. 26 ).

State Labor Relations Board v. Loram Realty Corp.

3 Misc. 2d 709 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1952

and (2) Was the board’s order proper when made? ” (Matter of New York State Labor Relations Bd. v. Timen, 264 App. Div. 120, 122 .) … (New York State Labor Relations Bd. v. Morales & Sons, 113 N. Y. S. 2d 518, Beldock, J.; Labor Bd. v. Bradford Dyeing Assn., 310 U. S. 318 ; Medo Corp. v. Labor Bd., 321 U. S. 678 .)

Rosenfeld v. Fairchild Engine & Airplane Corp.

201 Misc. 616 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1952

The plaintiff cites the case of Besseliew v. Brown ( 177 N. C. 65 ). … And in Braswell v. Morrow ( 195 N. C. 127, 132 ) the court in reviewing the problem presented in Besseliew v.

Minick v. Scranton

145 Misc. 2d 1006 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1989

Brown, J. This proceeding has its antecedents in a general election *1007 held on November 7, 1989. Petitioner Mark R. … (Matter of O’Shaughnessy v Monroe County Bd. of Elections, 15 AD2d 183 ; Matter of Gates v Scaringe, 105 AD2d 543 ; Matter of Decker v Jutkofsky, 77 AD2d 733 .)

American PCS, L.P. v. Fairfax County Zoning Appeals Board

40 Va. Cir. 211 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jul 30, 1996

(“APC”) for a writ of certiorari requesting the Court to reverse the decision of Respondent, the Fairfax County Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”), denying APC’s application for a special permit exception to locate a monopole … See, Foster v. Geller, 248 Va. 563, 566 (1994) (citations omitted). APC’s argument that the BZA’s application of the Zoning Ordinance is unconstitutional is without merit.

Chester v. Board of Review of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation

82 Ohio Law. Abs. 182 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Dec 1, 1959

The board relied on *184 prior board rulings “that a discharge for garnishments is a discharge for just cause in connection with work.” Secs. 4141.29 (C) (1) and 4141.30 (E) R. … In Chalker v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association et al, 71 Abs 87 ; 126 N.

People ex rel. Depew v. New York State Board of Parole

189 Misc. 321 · New York Supreme Court · May 26, 1947

Kleinger v. Wilson, 254 App. Div. 406, 409 ; People ex rel. Brackett v. Kaiser, 209 App. Div. 722 .) … (People v. Santa Clara Lumber Co., 213 N. Y. 61, 67 ; People v. Arnink, 270 App. Div. 792 , affd. 296 N. Y. 657 .)

People ex rel. Benner v. Board of Supervisors

46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 442 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1886

The power upon the part of the attorney general to employ special counsel in a case like this was not passed upon by the Court of Appeals in Attorney General v. Continental Life Insurance Company ( 88 N. Y., 571 ).

DuBois Dutch LLC v. Sandy Township Board of Supervisors

6 Pa. D. & C.5th 490 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County · Feb 23, 2007

(Mitchell v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Mount Penn, 838 A.2d 819 (Pa. Commw. 2003), reargument denied.) … (citations omitted) Dublin Properties v. Board of Commissioners of Upper Dublin Township, 21 Pa. Commw. 54 , 57 n.3, 342 A.2d 821 , 822 n.3 (1975).

People ex rel. Roosevelt v. Board of Supervisors

47 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 353 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1886

(People v. Supervisors, etc., 73 N. Y., 173 .) Under this rule the local act for Pelham is not repealed by the general one. The words “ every town ” can operate on every town where there is no local law.