Case law

Taff v. Board of Fire Commissioners of Bellerose Terrace Fire District

166 Misc. 704 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1938

Action to restrain the board of fire commissioners of the Bellerose Terrace Fire District from prohibiting plaintiffs *705 from attending meetings of the Bellerose Terrace Fire Department and otherwise performing their duties … grave doubts, it certainly is beyond the power of the board of fire commissioners to make the test of exclusion the granting of the certificate of exemption.

People ex rel. Superintendents of the Poor v. Board of Supervisors

43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 647 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1885

People ex rel. New York Elevated Railroad v. Board of Aldermen

10 Abb. N. Cas. 33 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1881

Didousis v. New York State Board of Parole

89 Misc. 2d 358 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1977

This determination was affirmed by the full Parole Board on August 16, 1976. … The respondent relies on Cummings v Regan ( 45 AD2d 415 ) which held that no reasons need be given for denying release on parole.

Dick's Inn, L.L.C. v. Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

60 Va. Cir. 407 · Virginia Circuit Court · Dec 4, 2002

Virginia Real Estate Comm’n v. Bias, 226 Va. 262, 269 , 308 S.E.2d 123 (1983), see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938). … Slochower v. Board of Higher Educ., 350 U.S. 551 (1956). The burden of proof is on Dick’s to show that the law is not rationally related to a legitimate state purpose.

Mishel v. New York State Board of Parole

73 Misc. 2d 207 · New York County Courts · Feb 6, 1973

Petite v. … Rainone v. Murphy (1 N Y 2d 367 [1956]). (See, also, Matter of Seible v. Oswald, 32 A D 2d 696.)

Marks Appeal

8 Pa. D. & C.3d 580 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Aug 28, 1978

After proper notices, a hearing was held on January 24, 1978, before James Brown, Esq., a hearing examiner representing the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board. … Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v.

Lichty v. Board of Education of Crane Township Rural School District

27 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 52 · Paulding County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 8, 1928

the decision of the local board refusing to furnish transportation. … In this case the county board did not so declare. The resolution as adopted does not order anything to be done by the county board.

City of Albany v. Public Employment Relations Board

84 Misc. 2d 555 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1976

(City of Buffalo v New York State Public Employment Relations Bd., 80 Misc 2d 741 .) … The board, of course, is PERB. While the board may utilize article 78 procedures provided in section 213, a party may not. (Buffalo Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Buffalo, 81 Misc 2d 172 .)

Morson v. Town of Gravesend

35 N.Y.S. 94 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1895

BROWN, P. J. This action was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due to the plaintiff for services as a police officer. … In Lorillard v. Town of Monroe, 11 N.

Butler v. New York State Board of Parole

122 Misc. 2d 298 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1983

Walsh v Vincent ( 40 NY2d 1049 ) and its progeny (Matter of Vasquez v New York State Bd. of Parole, 58 NY2d 981 ; People ex rel. Gonzales v Dalsheim, 52 NY2d 9 ). … Gonzales v Dalsheim, supra, at pp 14-15.)

Community School Board District No. 2 v. Lindsay

71 Misc. 2d 85 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1972

No. 3 v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 68 Misc 2d 826 ; Matter of Community School Bd. No. 3 v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 68 Misc 2d 66 ; Valdivieso v. Community School Bd., 67 Misc 2d 1007 .) … Kryger v. Board of Educ., 37 A D 2d 622; Matter of Community School Bd. No. 3 v. Board of Educ., 68 Misc 2d 66, 67 ).

Jam Rick Homes, Inc. v. Board of Appeals

57 Misc. 2d 820 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1968

This article 78 proceeding seeks a direction to the respondent Board of Appeals to grant a variance and issue a building permit for a four-family multiple dwelling. I find no merit to the application. … The ground rules are set forth in Matter of Wachsberger v.

Dock v. Board of School Directors of Mifflinburg Area School District

63 Pa. D. & C.2d 46 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Union County · Dec 26, 1972

L. 564, sec. 3, 24 PS §2-290.1, required the Union County Board of School Directors to submit a plan of reorganization of administrative units for county school districts to the State Board of Education before July 1, 1964 … V. Defendants also except to two conclusions of law: A. That the Resolution of the Western Area School District of February 13, 1964, was and is binding on the Mifflinburg Area School District; B.

Marmo v. New York City Board of Education

56 Misc. 2d 517 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1968

In 1951 the Court of Appeals held that school districts were not within the purview of the section (Schnepel v. Board of Educ. of City of Rochester, 302 N. Y. 94 ). … Thus, in Matter of Werfel v.

Hagan v. Murphy

39 Misc. 2d 82 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1963

Brown, 5 N Y 2d 51; Matter of Amann v. Finegan, 253 App. Div. 364 ; People ex rel. Stokes v. Tully, 108 App. Div. 345 ). … O’Connor v. Girvin, 227 N. Y. 392 ; Madden v. City of Stockton, 175 Cal. App. 2d 893 ; Matter of Mandle v. Brown, 5 N Y 2d 51). In Matter of Mandle v.

American Legion Clifton Post No. 421 v. Board of Liquor Control

68 Ohio Law. Abs. 361 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Jul 1, 1954

Cincinnati v. Roettinger, 105 Oh St 145; Madjorous v. State, 113 Oh St 427; 37 O. Jur. 555. Sec. 295. However, in 33 C. … Entry accordingly with exceptions by counsel for the Board of Liquor Control.

Youmans v. Board of Education of the Pataskala Special School District

13 Ohio C.C. 207 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Oct 15, 1896

The control and management of the schools of this state are given the boards of education,given by the statute to the boards of education, and these boards cannot be interfered with in any manner by the court unless there … Edward Kibler and John David Jones, on behalf of the Board of Education, etc.

Board of County Commissioners v. Citizens' Electric Railway, Light & Power Co.

9 Ohio C.C. 183 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1895

It is maintained by counsel for defendant in error that the case of the Commissioners of Gallia County v. Holcomb, 7 Ohio, 232, sustains their position. … Counsel for defendant in error cite Commissioners of Mahoning County v. The Railroad Company, 45 Ohio St., 401 , as sustaining the decision of the trial judge.

Fitzpatrick v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 2

54 Misc. 2d 1085 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1967

The Board of Education has the authority and the duty to adopt rules and regulations for the orderly and efficient operation of the school. … The board, however, must consider the general over-all operation of the school. The motion is, therefore, denied.