Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.35s

  • MPL Corp. v. Board of Coal Mine Safety & Technical Review Committee

    20 Ct. Cl. 8 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Von Dohren v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals

    9 Pa. D. & C.5th 387 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Oct 2, 2009

    The board’s argument is based on a decision by this court in Moore v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals, 72 D.&C.4th 47 (2005), affirmed in part, reversed in part on other grounds, 888 A.2d 40 (Pa. Commw. 2005). … Von Dohren from the decision of the Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals entered April 2,2009, and after trial held, the decision of the board is reversed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Freihofer v. Lake George Zoning Board of Appeals

    133 Misc. 2d 1057 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1986

    zoning ordinances to take notice of the land uses of its neighboring communities and, in fact, to consider regional needs and requirements (see, Berenson v Town of New Castle, supra; Blitz v Town of New Castle, 94 AD2d 92 … Significantly, this defense was not pleaded by the respondent Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kenyon v. Luther

    4 N.Y.S. 498 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1888

    So far as appears, these parties ordered him to sell five thousand bushels on the board of trade. Mr. Brown. … Brown.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Church v. New York Tribune Ass'n.

    63 Misc. 578 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1909

    The whereabouts of the different men will be investigated by the board of magistrates at its next meeting.” … Brown, 8 Johnson, 50 .)” The doctrine in Foot v. Brown was discussed at length in the later case of Secor v. Harris, 18 Barb. 425 , and the principle contended for declared unsound.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Young v. Board of Education of Union Free School District Eight

    193 Misc. 216 · New York County Courts · May 20, 1948

    (See Forsyth v. City of Oswego, 191 N. Y. 441 , 444: Cogan v. Burnham, 175 Mass. 391 : Barclay v. City of Boston, 167 Mass. 596 ; Barclay v. City of Boston, 173 Mass. 310 .) … And then in the much later Court of Appeals case, Russo v. City of New York ( 258 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Central School District No. 3 v. Nyquist

    42 Misc. 2d 224 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1964

    Y. v. … (Matter of Levitch v. Board of Educ., 243 N. Y. 373 .) A reading of the decision of the respondent clearly indicates that his determination was made after a thorough consideration of the facts and applicable statutes.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Reiff v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    128 Misc. 2d 851 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1985

    Vil. of Suffern, 40 AD2d 385 ; Matter of Temporary State Charter Revision Commn. v Board of Elections, 83 Misc 2d 1029 , affd 49 AD2d 845 , affd 37 NY2d 859 .) … (Rockland Woods v Incorporated Vil. of Suffern, supra, at pp 386-387; see also, Matter of Whitman Game Room v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, supra; Matter of Temporary State Charter Revision Commn. v Board of Elections, supra, at

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Empire State Savings Bank v. Beard

    30 N.Y.S. 756 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1894

    Jur. §§ 1091, 1094; 1 Perry, Trusts (3d Ed.) § 207; Charitable Corp. v. Sutton, 2 Atk. 405, 9 Mod. 349; Discount Co. v. Brown, L. R. 8 Eq. 381; Bank v. Hill, 56 Me. 385 ; Williams v. McKay, 40 N. J. … Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 ; Brinckerhoff v. Bostwick, 105 N. Y. 567, 571 , 12 N. E. 58 ; Railroad Co. v. Schuyler, 17 N. Y. 592 .

    Reversed by Empire State Savings Bank of Buffalo v. . Beard, 151 N.Y. 638 (1896)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of Schenectady v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    135 Misc. 2d 1088 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1986

    The city appealed to the full Board, and by decision dated July 10, 1986 the Board affirmed the Administrative Law Judge. … Section 205 establishes the Public Employment Relations Board and defines its duties.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hession v. Board of Education of Webb Schools

    111 Misc. 2d 351 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1981

    (Matter of Lynch v Nyquist, 41 AD2d 363, 365 , affd 34 NY2d 588 .) … (Matter of Chambers v Board of Educ., 47 NY2d 279 .) Respondent urges that at this late date, the removal of a teacher with least seniority could result in major problems in administration.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sodaro's Electronics v. Board of Directors of the State College System

    19 Ct. Cl. 222 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Long v. New York State Board of Parole

    92 Misc. 2d 895 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1977

    Petitioner seeks to review the board’s determination. It is now settled that reasons must be given by the board in fixing MPI. (Matter of Speed v Regan, 50 AD2d 1100 , affd 42 NY2d 1087 .) … Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 57 AD2d 955 ; Matter of Gonzague v New York State Bd. of Parole, 58 AD2d 707 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Tilson v. Bark

    52 Misc. 2d 338 · New York City Family Court · Nov 21, 1966

    Doley (22 A D 2d 769): “ The proceeding to establish paternity is a civil judicial proceeding and except where otherwise prescribed by the Family Court Act or by rule of the Administrative Board, the procedure is governed … Burch, 18 A D 2d 964; Appelbaum v. Appelbaum, 273 App. Div. 966 ; cf. Brown v. Brown, 20 A D 2d 860) hardly apply to a situation that does not involve the marital relation and its confidences.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Beef Burger, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Mayfield Heights

    29 Ohio Law Rep. 45 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Dec 9, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of Bowling Green City School District v. Beverstock

    7 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 373 · Wood Circuit Court · Nov 25, 1905

    That on August 21, 1905, the Board of Education of the Bowling Green City School District authorized the defendant, Newton R. … If the teachers who are employed or named by the board prior to the 20th, the date of the institute, had been employed or named by the board as teachers after institute closed on the 25th they certainly would have been unemployed

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Sutliff v. Board of Sup'rs of Fulton County

    20 N.Y.S. 280 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1892

    -This proceeding is against the board of supervisors as a board or body, and not against the individual supervisors of Fulton county. The defendant is to make a return as a board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hadden v. New York State Board of Parole

    95 Misc. 2d 211 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1978

    (People v Kowalski, 159 Misc 493 .) "The decision of the grand jury is justly entitled to great weight and should not be brushed aside or ignored.” (People v Pack, 179 Misc 316, 323 .) … See, also, People v Dillon ( 197 NY 254, 259 ) where it was stated, "when one grand jury has dismissed a bill it cannot be presented to another grand jury without leave of the court.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tyler v. Board Members of Adirondack Park Agency

    92 Misc. 2d 754 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1978

    Board of Members of Adirondack Park Agency, 86 Misc 2d 818 ), appealed by respondents and affirmed by the Appellate Division, Third Department, in its decision of June 30, 1977 ( 58 AD2d 718 ). … (Matter of Tyler v Board of Members of Adirondack Park Agency, supra.) . Petitioner had completed the entire construction of his new dwelling prior thereto.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bruce Appeal

    41 Pa. D. & C.2d 195 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County · Sep 12, 1966

    In accordance with subsection (6) of section 315 of the act, the commission filed with the prothonotary a certified record of the complete proceeding and resolution of the board, which cites the provisions of the act without … legislature, that the hearing shall be de novo, this court may make a judicial review of the ex parte administrative decision of the commission, and change the penalty to fit the violation, if any: Pennsylvania Game Commission v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.