Case law

Dalgewicz v. Falls Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

39 Pa. D. & C.2d 684 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Apr 20, 1966

Zoning Board of Adjustment, 414 Pa. 191, 195 ; Jacobi v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 413 Pa. 286, 290 . … Schaefer, 410 Pa. 239 ; Temple University v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, supra.

D. R. Hall Construction, Inc. v. Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors

40 Va. Cir. 260 · Spotsylvania County Circuit Court · Sep 3, 1996

Hall contends that it filed a formal claim pursuant to Virginia Code § 15.1-550 on September 15, 1995, and that the Board of Supervisors denied the claim on December 13, 1995. … Main v. Department of Highways, 206 Va. 143 (1965); General Excavation, Inc. v. Fairfax County, 33 Va. Cir. 120 (1993).

People v. Kern

51 Misc. 2d 209 · Rockville Centre Village Court · Jun 6, 1966

In that ease the defendants attended a school board meeting to protest the alleged failure of the board to correct racial imbalance in the public schools. … Great emphasis is placed on the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Brown v. Louisiana ( 383 U. S. 131 ). In my opinion the holding in the Brown case is not determinative of the case at bar.

Hubick v. Board of Supervisors of Rush Township

23 Pa. D. & C. 697 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County · Jul 23, 1934

Of course, the statutory definition controls: McCarl v. Houston Borough, 263 Pa. 1 . The fact that the “valuable consideration” was received from another is not controlling: Atherholt v. … William Stoddart Co., 286 Pa. 278, 280 ; Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc., et al., 290 Pa. 341, 346 .

Centex Homes, G.P. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

74 Va. Cir. 54 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Mar 26, 2007

The Board established no fixed date when the rezoning would become effective. … West Lewinsville Heights Ass’n v. Board of Supervisors, 270 Va. 259 (2005).

Koelle-Greenwood Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

5 Pa. D. & C.2d 267 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 30, 1955

parking certificate provision, under which the board purported to act. … In Katzin v.

Springfield Anesthesia, Ltd. v. State of Illinois, Board of Vocational Education & Rehabilitation

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 509 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 15, 1975

Town of Purcellville v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

74 Va. Cir. 417 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Dec 5, 2007

School Board of the City of Harrisonburg v. Alexander, 126 Va. 407, 412 , 101 S.E.2d 349 , 351 (1919). The grant of authority to take “any land” is a broad one. Id. … RR. v. Johnston, 103 Va. 456 (1905).

Board of Directors of House Beautiful at Woodbury Homeowners Ass'n v. Godt

32 Misc. 3d 366 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2011

Plaintiff relies on Board of Directors of Hunt Club at Coram Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Hebb ( 72 AD3d 997, 999 [2d Dept 2010]) for the proposition that, since the condominium notice of lien requirements of Real Property Law … In Board of Directors of Hunt Club at Coram Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Hebb ( 72 AD3d at 998 ) the Court held that the requirement of Real Property Law § 339-aa that a notice of lien be verified is not applicable to a homeowners

In re Hall

157 Misc. 768 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1936

Brown v. Freisch, 215 N. Y. 356, 368 .) … Brown v. Freisch, supra.)”

Board of Education of Katonah-Lewisboro School District v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School District

146 Misc. 2d 71 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1989

that this action seeks to recover the cost of tuition pursuant to Education Law § 3202 (4) (b) and, as such, is in the opinion of this court a lawsuit to vindicate a public interest (see, Valhalla Union Free School Dist. v … City of New York, 56 NY2d 950, 954 ; Butterfield v Board of Trustees, 131 AD2d 963, 964 ).

Independent Transit Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

76 Pa. D. & C. 144 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County · Dec 18, 1950

v. … Workers’ Association v. National Labor Relations Board, 117 F. (2d) 209.

Lauricella v. Planning & Zoning Board of Appeals

32 Conn. Supp. 104 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Dec 30, 1974

J & M Realty Co. v. Norwalk, 156 Conn. 185, 191 . … See Connecticut Co. v. New Haven, 103 Conn. 197, 211 . The interrelation between state and local law on the same subject matter is best expressed in the leading case of Shelton v. Shelton, 111 Conn. 433 .

State ex rel. Coates v. Board of County Commissioners

22 Ohio C.C. 57 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

Pugh, Prosecuting Attorney v. Brewster, Auditor, 44 O. S. 249, is cited in support of the demurrer. … Enoy.of Law,(2nd ed.) 206; Purdy v. Independence, 75 Iowa, 356 ; Fitzpatrick v. Flagg, 5 Abb. Pr. (N. Y.) 21.

Jackson's Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

21 Conn. Supp. 102 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Sep 4, 1958

Kamerman v. LeRoy, 133 Conn. 232, 237 ; O’Connor v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 140 Conn. 65, 72 ; Tyler v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 145 Conn. 655, 662 . … Misuk v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 138 Conn. 477, 481 .

Captain's Cove Utility Co. v. State Water Control Board

74 Va. Cir. 253 · Accomack County Circuit Court · Oct 11, 2007

The Board first denied the permit at a meeting on September 6, 2006. … But it is not just the condemnation that results in disapproval by the Board. Disapproval on that sole basis would violate the rule of Commonwealth v.

Twin Grill Co. v. Local Joint Executive Board

60 Pa. D. & C. 379 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Aug 28, 1947

Corp. v. United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers, 353 Pa. 446, 457 ; Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. United Steel Workers of America et al., 353 Pa. 420 . … The principles of the Swing case are controlling in Pennsylvania: Friedman v. Blumberg et al., 342 Pa. 387 . The following extract from A. F. of L. et al. v.

Buffalo Press Club v. Greene

5 Misc. 501 · Superior Court of Buffalo · Nov 15, 1893

Brown v. Brown, 34 Barb. 533 . … Brown v. Brown, 34 Barb. 533 . The legal presumption is in favor of the bond, but it is not conclusive, and it may cover an illegal consideration, and such a fact may be shown by parol evidence.

Association of Commercial Property Owners v. New York City Loft Board

128 Misc. 2d 370 · New York Supreme Court · May 30, 1985

In this regard, it was the opinion of counsel to the Loft Board that Multiple Dwelling Law § 286 (2) prohibits the Board from enacting a regulation which includes a pass-along. … Co. v City Rent & Rehabilitation Admin., 11 NY2d 480, 490 ).

People ex rel. Churchyard v. Board of Councilmen

47 N.Y. St. Rep. 149 · Superior Court of Buffalo · Aug 3, 1892

Dillon on Municipal Corporations, 4 ed., §§ 208-331; Martindale v. Palmer, 52 Ind., 413 ; National Bank of Commerce v. Town of Grenada, 41 Fed. Rep., 91; MacKenzie v. Tax Collector, 39 La. Ann., 949 . … Hoey v. Gilroy, 129 N. Y., 138 ; 41 St. Rep., 181 ; Bork v. City of Buffalo, 127 N. Y., 64 ; 37 St. Rep., 332 . And that such rule is to be applied here.