Case law

Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission

27 Misc. 3d 254 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 2009

In motion sequence number 001, petitioners, Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade (MTBOT), Midtown Car Leasing Corp. (Midtown), Ronart Leasing Corp. (Ronart), and Linden Maintenance Corp. … (Matter of Miller v Kozakiewicz, 300 AD2d 399, 400 [2d Dept 2002].)

Huddleston, Hubbard & Co. v. Hagerty

2 Ohio N.P. 291 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Dec 15, 1893

It seems to me the case of Brown v. Houston, 114 United State, 622, settles this point. … The court, in Brown v.

Pennsylvania Milk Products Corp. v. Milk Control Board

26 Pa. D. & C. 489 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Apr 20, 1936

The appellee has cited as authority for its position the case of Hegeman Farms Corp. v. Baldwin et al., 293 U. S. 163 . That was a suit in equity: an injunction was prayed for. … The case of Bell Telephone Co. of Pa. v. Lewis et al., 313 Pa. 374 , cited by the appellee, is not applicable.

Norristown Election

70 Pa. D. & C. 443 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Feb 1, 1950

J., In the above case, the recount board reported that four ballots were rejected by the board, and an undisclosed number of split ballots were improperly marked. … Gomery, Mary Brown, and Marie McGabey, petitioners.

Purcellville West, L.L.C. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

75 Va. Cir. 284 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Jun 26, 2008

Board of Supervisors of Culpeper County v. Greengael, L.L.C., 271 Va. 266, 284 (2006) (quoting Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v. Snell Constr. Corp., 214 Va. 655, 658 (1974)). … Code Ann. § 15.2-2307 ; See, Goyonaga v. Board of Zoning App. of Falls Church, 275 Va. 232 *286 (2008).

In re the Arbitration between Berk & Berk

8 Misc. 2d 732 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1957

Brown, J. Motion by petitioner to stay an action in the City Court wherein respondent is plaintiff and petitioner and others are defendants. … The board can apply the legal, moral and religious law to the dispute between the parties which is what the parties contemplated and intended when they agreed to arbitrate their dispute before such board.

Brooklyn Children's Aid Society v. Industrial Board of the Department of Labor

136 Misc. 379 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1930

(Matter of Rheinwald v. Builders’ Brick & Supply Co., 168 App. Div. 425 ; Allen v. State, 173 id. 455 ; Krug v. City of New York, 196 id. 226.) These cases, also the case of Beeman v. … Board of Education of Penn Yan ( 195 App.

Brabson v. School Directors of Fulton Township

88 Pa. D. & C. 577 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · May 14, 1954

Brown, his heirs and assigns, forever”; without more passed to him the reversionary interest,- and in support thereof cite the cases of Scheetz v. Fitzwater, 5 Pa. 126 , and Siegel v. Lauer et al., 148 Pa. 236, 250 . … This has also been held to be the law in a Kentucky case, namely, Kincaid v. McGowan et al., 4 S. W. 802 , cited by counsel for certain heirs of Elisha Brown.

Wainwright v. Queens County Water Co.

28 N.Y.S. 987 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1894

BROWN, P. J. The plaintiffs rest their right to recover solely upon the contract entered into between the defendant and the fire, district. … Turk v. Ridge, 41 N. Y. 207 ; Merrill v. Green, 55 N. Y. 270 ; Simson v. Brown, 68 N. Y. 355 .

State ex rel. Greenwald v. Hagerty

3 Ohio Cir. Dec. 12 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1890

the board of control, giving authority to the county commissioners to make and improve roads, etc., do not come within sec. 999, giving the board of control final action over the commissioners’ acts. … The act establishing the board of control is not a general act. The law as it stood in 1879 was sustained by the district court of this county, in the case of State ex rel. v. Brown, 6 Dec.

Stump v. West Manchester Township Zoning Hearing Board

45 Pa. D. & C.3d 149 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County · Feb 12, 1986

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Bar Association v. Thornburgh, 62 Pa. … Khan v. Harrisburg, Zoning Hearing Board, 17 D.&C.3d 1 (1981). When the zoning board fails to render a decision within 45 days, the decision is deemed to be in favor of the applicant. A.Z.J.Z v.

Carter v. Board of Education of Presbyterian Church of United States

23 N.Y.S. 95 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1893

The court, in Floyd v. Carow, 88 N. … And in Riker v. Cornwell, 113 N. Y. 115 , 20 N. E.

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Potsdam Board of Assessors

162 Misc. 2d 388 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1994

Co. v Board of Assessors ( 81 NY2d 1029 [1993] [LILCO]) involved the distribution of a product, i.e., natural gas and electricity, directly to the consumer site via utility poles, wires and mains which were used to transmit … Co. v County of Nassau, supra, at 1030-1031 [citations omitted].)

Drop v. Yough School District Board of Directors

29 Pa. D. & C.3d 180 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County · Mar 16, 1984

In particular, Mandamus will lie to enforce a statutory duty imposed upon a school board which duty is mandatory, in the absence for proper grounds of non-compliance. Elias *183 v. … Feist v. Luzerne County Board of Assessment Appeals, 21 Pa. Commw. 181 , 347 A.2d 772 (1975). We are not persuaded of bad faith in the instant matter.

Gohn v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Columbia

27 Pa. D. & C.3d 353 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Nov 16, 1982

In Kollock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Philadelphia, 27 Pa. … See also Cutler v. Newtown Township Zoning Hearing Board, 27 Pa. Commw. 430 , 367 A.2d 772 (1976).

Central Transportation, Inc. v. Board of Assessment Appeals

30 Pa. D. & C.3d 622 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cambria County · Jan 9, 1981

McWILLIAMS, P.J., The county filed exceptions to the opinion and order of *623 the court dated December 3, 1980, sustaining the appeal from the Board of Assessment Appeals of Cambria County of Central Transportation, Inc. … In support of the motion to quash, Central cites Commonwealth ex rel Foremen v. Hampson, 393 Pa. 467 , 143 A.2d 369 (1958).

Red Arrow, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

23 Pa. D. & C.3d 538 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Blair County · Oct 6, 1982

board. … Even if our adjudication of one less violation than found by the board were materially different from the board’s (see Barone’s, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 10 Pa.

Ciccone v. Lower Saucon Township Zoning Hearing Board

46 Pa. D. & C.3d 408 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · May 5, 1987

The closest case dealing with the issue before us is Price v. Zoning Hearing Board of Hanover Township, Lehigh County, 72 Pa. Commw. 5 , 455 A.2d 1267 (1983). … Plaintiff’s brief cites the case of Harmon et ux. v. Reinert, 38 Leh. Co.

Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

33 Pa. D. & C.2d 405 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Feb 15, 1964

We are authorized to reverse or affirm in whole or in part, as to us may appear just and proper: Dooling’s Windy Hill, Inc. v. Springfield Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, 371 Pa. 291 , 89 A. 2d 505 . … O’Neill is discussed in Richman v.

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals

31 Pa. D. & C.3d 467 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Mar 22, 1984

In Voegthy v. … The reasoning in Arbuckle’s Estate, supra, was followed in Commonwealth v.