Case law

Middle Creek Bible Conference, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

33 Pa. D. & C.3d 450 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County · Feb 4, 1985

The board argues that it would have been unreasonable to have scheduled a hearing before the Bostwick appeal had determined the issues to be presented. It cites Morris v. … ‘In Atlantic Richfield Co. v. City of Bethlehem, 69 Pa. Commw. 6, 13 , 450 A. 2d 248 , 252 specifically footnote 4 (1982), a hearing board held a hearing and then erroneously relied on res judicata.

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Board of Assessment Appeals

37 Pa. D. & C.3d 596 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Mar 22, 1984

In Voegthy v. … The reasoning in Arbuckle’s Estate, supra, was followed in Commonwealth v.

Board of Supervisors of Liberty Township v. Charnita, Inc.

34 Pa. D. & C.3d 552 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County · Mar 13, 1984

Contractor Industries v. Zerr, 241 Pa. Super. 92 , 359 A.2d 803 (1976). See also, O’Brien v. O’Brien Steel Construction Co., 440 Pa. 375 , 271 A.2d 254 (1970); Shafer v. A.I.T.S., Inc., 285 Pa. … Shohola Township Board of Supervisors v. Bishop, 279 Pa. Super. 313 , 421 A.2d 215 (1980).

Board of Education v. New York State Division of Human Rights

99 Misc. 2d 643 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1979

School Dist. v State Div. of Human Rights, 46 AD2d 1004 ; State Div. of Human Rights v Board of Educ., 53 AD2d 1043 , affd 42 NY2d 862 .) … This rule apparently has been changed in Matter of Tessy Plastics Corp. v State Div. of Human Rights ( 62 AD2d 36 , affd 47 NY2d 789 ).

Harrison v. Upper Merion Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

45 Pa. D. & C.2d 452 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · May 28, 1968

See also Von Gerbig v. Marshall, 36 D. & C. 2d 133, 140-141 (1964); Shoemaker v. York Junior College, 30 D. & C. 2d 750, 752 (1963); and Steppler v. Board of Adjustment of Radnor Township, 5 D. & C. 2d 8, 18 (1955). … In Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 62 (1958), and Best v.

Tax Review Board v. Cuneo Eastern Press, Inc.

65 Pa. D. & C.2d 163 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 17, 1973

We have examined Perfect Photo Service, Inc., Tax Review Board opinion no. 61-16 (1961), and Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. National Oil Co. Ltd., 17 Dauph. 276 (1914).

Locher v. Haserot

34 Ohio C.C. Dec. 381 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Nov 10, 1912

As said in Beaver v. … In Coppin v. Hermann, 9 Dec. 146 (6 N.

Strauser v. West Goshen Township Zoning Hearing Board

50 Pa. D. & C.2d 571 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · Jul 11, 1970

Legal principles which have application to the case at hand have been set forth by the Supreme Court in the case of Hanna v. … of that board. 4.

City of New Britain v. Connecticut State Board of Labor Relations

31 Conn. Supp. 211 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Jul 18, 1974

Huntington v. Birch, 12 Conn. 142, 149 ; Wilson v. West Haven, 142 Conn. 646, 657 . … This is persuasive evidence of the intention of the lawmaking body; Wilson v. New Haven, supra, 654 ; which is the polestar of statutory construction.

Barr v. Board of Assessment & Revision of Taxes

86 Pa. D. & C. 598 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Nov 6, 1953

Board of Revision of Taxes and Appeals, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 101 ; Camphuis et al., trustees v. Bradford County Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 302 . … of revision: Phinney v.

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. International Harvester Co.

61 Pa. D. & C. 637 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Nov 3, 1947

To the counting of this ballot and the resultant final decree of the board, exception was filed, which was overruled by the board under final order dated July 2, 1947. … This appears in his report of said election dated March 7,1947, filed with the board.

Gargiolo v. City of Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

32 Pa. D. & C.5th 44 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Aug 8, 2013

Pennsylvania Game Commission v. Dept. of Environmental Resources, 555A.2d812(Pa. 1989); Robinson Tp. v. … or other board or commission created to regulate development within the city.

Vanderveen v. Commonwealth

44 Pa. D. & C.2d 618 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County · Mar 28, 1968

Our Supreme Court in 1862 decided Brown v. … The Supreme Court in Schuylkill Railroad Company v. Harris, 124 Pa. 215 , (1889), reaffirmed Brown v. *620 Corey & Peterson, supra, and Monongahela v.

Brabson v. School Directors of Fulton Township

88 Pa. D. & C. 577 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · May 14, 1954

Brown, his heirs and assigns, forever”; without more passed to him the reversionary interest,- and in support thereof cite the cases of Scheetz v. Fitzwater, 5 Pa. 126 , and Siegel v. Lauer et al., 148 Pa. 236, 250 . … This has also been held to be the law in a Kentucky case, namely, Kincaid v. McGowan et al., 4 S. W. 802 , cited by counsel for certain heirs of Elisha Brown.

Mulholland v. Board of Education of Yorktown Central School District No. 2

70 Misc. 2d 852 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1972

Relying upon Matter of Wein *855 brown v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 15, Town of Hempstead (28 N Y 2d 474), petitioner’s argument is that once the board had granted tenure, it could not take it away. … Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 16 N Y 2d 982, affg. 21 A D 2d 891, revg. 39 Misc 2d 761 ; Matter of Mannix v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 21 N Y 2d 455, affg. 24 A D 2d 481; Matter of Kobylski v.

Dreyfuss v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3

72 Misc. 2d 703 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1972

By virtue of initiating arbitration, petitioner has not “ elected his remedy ” so as to preclude judicial review of the board’s determination. (Matter of Wallace v. MVAIC, 25 N Y 2d 384, 389; Fitzgerald v. … There is sufficient basis for determining the board’s position on the merits, since no factual dispute is presented in the submissions. (See Matter of Board of Educ. of City School List, of City of Mount Vernon v.

State ex rel. Greenwald v. Hagerty

3 Ohio Cir. Dec. 12 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1890

the board of control, giving authority to the county commissioners to make and improve roads, etc., do not come within sec. 999, giving the board of control final action over the commissioners’ acts. … The act establishing the board of control is not a general act. The law as it stood in 1879 was sustained by the district court of this county, in the case of State ex rel. v. Brown, 6 Dec.

Norristown Election

70 Pa. D. & C. 443 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Feb 1, 1950

J., In the above case, the recount board reported that four ballots were rejected by the board, and an undisclosed number of split ballots were improperly marked. … Gomery, Mary Brown, and Marie McGabey, petitioners.

Village of Pelham v. New York State Board of Equalization & Assessment

208 Misc. 201 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1955

City of New York v. Chapman, supra.) … City of *206 New York v. Keeler, 237 N. Y. 332 ; People ex rel. City of New York v. Tripp, 237 N. Y. 568 ; People ex rel. City of New York v. Voris, 237 N. Y. 569 .)

People ex rel. Morejon v. New York State Board of Parole

183 Misc. 2d 435 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1999

Wilson v Parole, Crim Ct of City of NY, Sept. 9, 1997, Sheindlin, J.). … Romano v Warden, 28 NY2d 928 [1971]; People ex rel. Yacobellis v McKendrick, 28 NY2d 808 [1971]; People ex rel. Furtak v Mancusi, 26 NY2d 966 [1970]).