Case law

Bowman v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals

54 Pa. D. & C.4th 544 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Dec 20, 2001

This section provides as follows: “(d) The county Board of Assessment Appeals may not terminate preferential assessment of land previously determined by the board to qualify for preferential assessment without: “(2) Written … The board may not terminate preferential assessment of land without the required written notice. As stated in the case of Skepton v.

Komyathy v. Board of Education of Wappinger Central School District No. 1

75 Misc. 2d 859 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1973

Allen, 15 N Y 2d 259; Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. v. Allen, 6 N Y 2d 127). … (Matter of Ocean Hill-Brownsville Governing Bd. v. Board of Educ. of *864 City of N. Y., 23 N Y 2d 483, supra; Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 324, app. dsmd. 371 U. S. 74 ; see Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.

Ferro Concrete Construction Co. v. Board of Education

11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 86 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Feb 7, 1911

The moment his proposal is opened by the executive board he is held as in a' grasp of steel. There is no remedy, no escape. … The Supreme Court of Illinois in the case of Bromagin & Co. v. City of Bloomington, reported in 84 N. E. Reporter, page 700 (234 Ills., 114), followed the ease of Moffett et al v. Rochester .

Plate v. Kincannon Place Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n Board of Directors

30 Va. Cir. 323 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 5, 1993

Blackwelder Furniture Co. v. Seilig Mfg. Co., 550 F.2d 189 (4th Cir. 1977); Zaki v. Oberoi, 18 Va. Cir. 209, 210 (Fairfax County 1989); Heublein, Inc. v. Dept. of A.B.C., 12 Va. … Partnership v. CFS Mgt. Co., 133 Bankr. 74, 75 (E.D. Va. 1991); Baker v. Loudoun County School Board, 17 Va. Cir. 217, 218 (1989).

Bonds of State Employees

4 Pa. D. & C. 260 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Harrisburg County · Jan 4, 1924

Brown, Dep. … The cost of said bonds shall be paid for by the board out of a specific appropriation to be made to said board in the General Appropriation Bill for that purpose, upon warrants drawn by the Auditor General upon the State

Hooker v. Board of Directors of Wittenberg College

2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 353 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jan 15, 1873

Express Co. v. Bachman, 2 Superior Court Rep. 256; Leach v. Church, 10 Ohio St. 148 . This bill of exceptions does not state that Startzman was incompetent to contract by reason of a diseased and unsound mind. … See also Goudy’s Adm’r v.. Gebhart, 1 Ohio St. 262 .

Eckman v. Carbon County Board of Assessment Appeals

52 Pa. D. & C.4th 411 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County · Jan 31, 2001

See Lyness v. … Michael V. Franciosa specially presiding, in Ackerman v. Carbon County, no. 94-2505; Judge Franciosa’s order was affirmed by the Commonwealth Court at 703 A.2d 82 (Pa.

People ex rel. Williamson v. Allen

42 Barb. 203 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1864

(Cobee v. Davis, 8 How. Pr. R. 367.) … Williamson and Brown as individuals, and not as a board, was insufficient. They deny that any demand was made, and they also deny that Messrs. Purser and Woodruff have been appointed to the office of commissioner.

Grant v. Newton

1 E.D. Smith 95 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 15, 1850

The son, while thus traveling, took passage on board the defendant’s passenger boat and delivered his trunk and hat box into the care of the defendant’s agent on board. … Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. 117 , Justice Nelson says, “ money, except what may he carried for the expenses of traveling, is not thus included.” In Hollister v.

Todal Custom Builders, Inc. v. Town Board of Hempstead

52 Misc. 2d 311 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1966

Under the facts of this case the principle that an ordinance which destroys the greater part of its value is unconstitutional (Dowsey v. Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221 ; Rockdale Constr. Corp. v. … Y. 519 ; Vernon Park Realty v. City of Mount Vernon, 307 N. Y. 493 ) is not applicable. While the aforesaid cases were concerned with use restrictions such a distinction would be spurious. Plaintiff cites Riviere v.

Donovan v. Board of Education of Peekskill Union Free School District

198 Misc. 330 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1950

Petitioner, a ■ woman fifty-six years of age, sustained personal injuries on January 12,1950, while on premises controlled by the Board of Education of Peekskill "Union Free School District. … While consideration has been given to the decision in Braunstein v. City of New York ( 272 App. Div. 1060 [2d Dept., Nov. 1947]), the court is inclined to follow the holding in Haas v.

Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare v. Lawrence County Board of Assessment Appeals

38 Pa. D. & C.5th 421 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · May 21, 2014

In Lobolito, Inc. v. … In Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v.

MYC New York Marina, L.L.C. v. Town Board

17 Misc. 3d 751 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 2007

Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of N. … “Arbitrary action is without sound basis in reason and is generally taken without regard to the facts” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

Hurley v. Van Wagner

28 Barb. 109 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1858

By the Court, Brown, J. This court decided in Jackson v. … Strong, Mnott and Brown, Justices.] The judgment of the county court should be affirmed.

Fortsmouth Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc. v. Warren County Board of Supervisors

49 Va. Cir. 377 · Warren County Circuit Court · Jul 23, 1999

King v. County of Arlington, 195 Va. 1084, 1090 (1954). … See Richard Deal & Assocs. v. Commonwealth, 224 Va. 618, 622 , 299 S.E.2d 346 (1993).

Ciccone v. Lower Saucon Township Zoning Hearing Board

46 Pa. D. & C.3d 408 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · May 5, 1987

The closest case dealing with the issue before us is Price v. Zoning Hearing Board of Hanover Township, Lehigh County, 72 Pa. Commw. 5 , 455 A.2d 1267 (1983). … Plaintiff’s brief cites the case of Harmon et ux. v. Reinert, 38 Leh. Co.

Socony Mobil Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

33 Pa. D. & C.2d 405 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Feb 15, 1964

We are authorized to reverse or affirm in whole or in part, as to us may appear just and proper: Dooling’s Windy Hill, Inc. v. Springfield Township Zoning Board of Adjustment, 371 Pa. 291 , 89 A. 2d 505 . … O’Neill is discussed in Richman v.

State ex rel. Allah v. New York State Board of Parole

101 Misc. 2d 482 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1979

admission made to be tainted by illegality (Brown v Illinois, 422 US 590 ), and the admission of the illegal evidence a violation of petitioner’s due process rights (People ex rel. … Piccarillo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 64 AD2d 642 ).

Sprenger Brewery Ltd. v. Pa. Liquor Control Board

27 Pa. D. & C.3d 19 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · May 23, 1983

Sprenger Brewery cites Centrum Prime Meats v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, _ Pa. Commw. _, 455 A. 2d 742 (1983), and Larkin v. … Centrum Prime Meats v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, supra, at 745. .

Birdneck Villas Condominium Ass'n Board of Directors v. Birdneck Villas, L.L.C.

73 Va. Cir. 175 · Virginia Beach County Circuit Court · Apr 2, 2007

For instance, in *177 Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. … In Baker v.