Case law

Adamson v. Tate Township Board of Zoning Appeals

83 Ohio Misc. 2d 17 · Clermont County Court of Common Pleas · Mar 27, 1996

Section 4(D)(3)(a), Article V, TTZR. Therefore, the front yard is determined by the street bordering the property. … Whiteco Metrocom, Inc. v. Columbus (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 185 , 640 N.E.2d 563 .

Backus v. Atkinson

24 Va. Cir. 479 · Fredericksburg County Circuit Court · Sep 27, 1991

Oliver v. Forsyth, 190 Va. 710 (1950). … Gabbard v. Knight, 202 Va. 40 (1960).

Hooker v. Board of Directors of Wittenberg College

2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 353 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jan 15, 1873

Express Co. v. Bachman, 2 Superior Court Rep. 256; Leach v. Church, 10 Ohio St. 148 . This bill of exceptions does not state that Startzman was incompetent to contract by reason of a diseased and unsound mind. … See also Goudy’s Adm’r v.. Gebhart, 1 Ohio St. 262 .

Rauh v. Board of Commissioners of the Department of Public Parks

66 How. Pr. 368 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1884

Ho statute has been cited which gives to the board of commissioners of the department of public parks any greater corporate powers than those conferred upon the other departments of the city government. … Entertaining these views I am of the opinion that the board of commissioners of the department of public parks are not liable to be sued as a corporate entity, and that therefore it is unnecessary to discus's any of.' the

Lewis v. Dicker

118 Misc. 2d 28 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1982

such nature that it might be presumed the officers would commit a breach of trust in refusing to proceed’ ” had apparently occurred {supra, p 337, quoting Wilson v Brown, 269 Pa 225, 227). … Brown, 269 Pa 225, 227).

Bowman v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals

54 Pa. D. & C.4th 544 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Dec 20, 2001

This section provides as follows: “(d) The county Board of Assessment Appeals may not terminate preferential assessment of land previously determined by the board to qualify for preferential assessment without: “(2) Written … The board may not terminate preferential assessment of land without the required written notice. As stated in the case of Skepton v.

Donovan v. Board of Education of Peekskill Union Free School District

198 Misc. 330 · New York Supreme Court · May 2, 1950

Petitioner, a ■ woman fifty-six years of age, sustained personal injuries on January 12,1950, while on premises controlled by the Board of Education of Peekskill "Union Free School District. … While consideration has been given to the decision in Braunstein v. City of New York ( 272 App. Div. 1060 [2d Dept., Nov. 1947]), the court is inclined to follow the holding in Haas v.

Board of Supervisors v. People ex rel. McMaster & Harvey

7 Hill & Den. 504 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

Beers, ( 23 Wend. 103 ,) and Purdy v. … As *510 to the first, Warner v.

Shenango Presbyterian Seniorcare v. Lawrence County Board of Assessment Appeals

38 Pa. D. & C.5th 421 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lawrence County · May 21, 2014

In Lobolito, Inc. v. … In Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v.

Medford Real Properties v. Town Board of Brookhaven

23 Misc. 3d 303 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 2008

Utschig, 98 NY2d 304 [2002]; Matter of Grigoraki v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 52 AD3d 832 [2d Dept 2008]). … V Brookhaven Town Code: At the present time, Town Code § 85-43 authorizes the Planning Board to review commercial and residential site plan applications.

Board of Education of Blue Ash Special School District No. 16 v. Board of Education of Concord Special School District No. 8

11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 286 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jan 15, 1911

But a board of education shall not collect tuition for such attendance until after notice thereof has been given to the board of education of the district where the pupils reside. … Nothing herein shall require the consent of the board of education of the district where the pupils reside to such attendance.”

Ferro Concrete Construction Co. v. Board of Education

11 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 86 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Feb 7, 1911

The moment his proposal is opened by the executive board he is held as in a' grasp of steel. There is no remedy, no escape. … The Supreme Court of Illinois in the case of Bromagin & Co. v. City of Bloomington, reported in 84 N. E. Reporter, page 700 (234 Ills., 114), followed the ease of Moffett et al v. Rochester .

Vince v. Ohio Board of Examiners of Architects

71 Ohio Misc. 2d 22 · Portage County Court of Common Pleas · Dec 6, 1994

Co., Inc. v. Hennosy (1991), 71 Ohio App.3d 490, 494 , 594 N.E.2d 725, 727-728 . … If the Board’s decision is lawful and supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence, its decision must be upheld. Our Place, Inc. v.

Davidson v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

86 Misc. 744 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1976

(People v Justices of Delaware, 1 Johns. Cas. 182 .) … (Matter of Erlanger v Regents of Univ. of State of New York, 256 App Div 444 ; Matter of Marburg v Cole, 286 NY 202 .)

In re Brooks

101 Misc. 715 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1917

Brown v. Board of Supervisors, Suffolk County, 216 N. Y. 732 , reversing the decision of the Appellate Division, second *716 department, reported in 170 App. … The Brown case does not refer to the Garvin case. Section 358 of the Election Law relates to general elections.

Fortsmouth Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc. v. Warren County Board of Supervisors

49 Va. Cir. 377 · Warren County Circuit Court · Jul 23, 1999

King v. County of Arlington, 195 Va. 1084, 1090 (1954). … See Richard Deal & Assocs. v. Commonwealth, 224 Va. 618, 622 , 299 S.E.2d 346 (1993).

Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Mancuso Bros.

25 Misc. 2d 122 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 2, 1960

On December 16,1949 plaintiff Board of Education contracted with defendant Ketcham for his architectural services in connection with the design and construction of a school building and bus garage. … (Conklin v. Draper, 254 N. Y. 620 , affg. 229 App. Div. 227 ; Frankel v. Wolper, 181 App. Div. 485 , affd. 228 N. Y. 582 .)

AG-II Acquisition Corp. v. Board of Assessors

21 Misc. 3d 543 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2008

Matter of Cerro v Washington County Bd. of Supervisors ( 270 AD2d 679 [3d Dept 2000]) involved a challenge to the determination of the Washington County Board of Supervisors to sell a parcel of county-owned property to the … School Dist. v Saratoga County Indus. Dev. Agency, 217 AD2d 330 [3d Dept 1995].)

Illinois State Trust Co. v. Board of Trustees

39 Ill. Ct. Cl. 1 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Aug 4, 1986

The claim arises out of a lease entered into by Southern Illinois University and sublet or assigned to the Illinois Junior College Board and State Community College of St. Louis. … Claimants rejected the proposal by letter, dated September 14, 1971, and addressed to the Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University.

Botens v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1

26 Misc. 2d 158 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1960

(Matter of O’Connor v. Emerson, 196 App. Div. 807, 810 , affd. 232 N. Y. 561 ; Leone v. Hunter, 21 Misc 2d 750 ; Madeo v. McGuire, 192 N. Y. S. 2d 936, 938.) … that board.