Case law

People ex rel. Sinclair v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Center

152 Misc. 2d 928 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991

Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d, at 399 .) … Brown v Smith, 115 AD2d 255 [4th Dept 1985]; People ex rel.

People ex rel. Town of Knox v. Board of Supervisors

63 How. Pr. 411 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1882

The notice must specify the line to be fixed, concerning which the dispute exists, “ particularly describing the same,” and it must also describe “ the line as proposed to be acted upon by such board.” … Until such a notice is given the board has no authority to act.

People ex rel. McCully v. Board of Commissioners of Excise

17 N.Y.S. 945 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1892

Britt, L.P. v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

43 Va. Cir. 171 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jul 28, 1997

Nassif v. Board of Supervisors, 231 Va. 472, 479 , 345 S.E.2d 520 (1986); Board of Supervisors v. Donatelli & Klein, 228 Va. 620, 628 , 325 S.E.2d 342 (1985). … Board of Supervisors v. Telecommunications Indus., Inc., 246 Va. 472, 475 , 436 S.E.2d 442 (1993); Arlington County Board v. Ginsberg, 228 Va. 633, 640 , 325 S.E.2d 348 (1985).

State ex rel. Bryce Furnace Co. v. Board of Education

7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 338 · Lucas Circuit Court · Feb 9, 1897

A copy of *339 that bid, together with the proposed contract, is attached to the petition v and made a. part thereof. … In connection with that statute there is another which we think has some application, and that is section 794, which provides: ‘ ‘ When any board of commissions, board of trustees, officers, or board of diiectors of the state

State ex rel. Coal & Coke Co. v. Board, of Education

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 735 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1895

If an advertisement was necessary, the statute gives the board such right. If it is not required, it had the right to make such stipulations as it chose. In ■ this, the case differs from those decided in Beaver v. … Trustees, 19 Ohio St., 97 , and American Clock Co. v. Licking Co., 31 Ohio St., 415 , in which the statutes under which the proceedings was had, required the contract to be made with the lowest bidder. Writ refused.

Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

78 Misc. 2d 975 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1973

People ex rel. Van Hise v. Board of Police Commissioners

63 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 648 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1890

People ex rel. Supervisors of Alexander v. Board of Supervisors

7 Hill & Den. 171 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1844

But it is insisted on the part of the board of supervisors that although the county is answerable in the first instance, the expense is ultimately chargeable upon the town of Alexander, where the lunatic had acquired a legal … We think the board of supervisors erred in charging the expense upon the town of Alexander, and a mandamus must therefore be awarded; Motion granted.

Limpert v. Day

7 Ohio Misc. 231 · Cuyahoga County Probate Court · Jun 28, 1966

Walsh v. Barron, Treas., 61 Ohio St. 15 ; Domito v. Maumee, 140 Ohio St. 229 . … Shafer, v. Otter, Surveyor, 106 Ohio St. 415 ; Baxter v. Van Houter, Auditor, 115 Ohio St. 288 ; Domito v. Village of Maumee, supra.

Tanners Cluster Ass'n Board of Directors v. DiLeo

42 Va. Cir. 119 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 7, 1997

Shevel’s Inc. v. Southeastern Assoc., 228 Va. 175, 181 (1984). “It applies only to cases in which no trial is necessary because no evidence could affect the result.” Fire Assurance Corp. v. … See Slone v. General Motors Corp., 249 Va. 520 (1995); Turner v. Lotts, 244 Va. 554, 556 (1992).

Episcopal Church of St. Peter v. Varian

28 Barb. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1858

By the Court, Brown, J. 1. The bond in question is a substantial compliance with the requirements of section 222 of the code. … White and others v. Skinner, 13 John. 307 . Meech v. Smith, 7 Wend. 315 .)

Island Grill, Ltd. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

34 Va. Cir. 492 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Sep 30, 1994

Medical Structures, Inc., 213 Va. 355 , 192 S.E.2d 799 (1972), and ending with the very recent case of Snow v. Amherst County Board of Zoning Appeals, 248 Va. 404 (1994). In fact, in Holland v. … In Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County v.

New York State Labor Relations Board v. National Beauty Parlors, Inc.

180 Misc. 997 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1943

Petitioner, New York State Labor Relations Board, seeks to compel compliance with its order. … In its finding the Board was indisputably correct. There was no bona fide rental intended or effected. The relationship remained as it was before — employer and employee.

Rushworth v. Board of Examiners of Moving Picture Machine Operators

4 Balt. C. Rep. 371 · Baltimore City Court · Mar 2, 1925

The application is for a writ requiring the Board to grant petitioner an examination under the provisions of Section 691-E of the City Charter, being Ch. 195 of the Acts of 1918. … It would be very desirable if the Board should promulgate some general rule for the guidance of applicants, so that they might be advised as to a method, satisfactory to the Board, of proving the fact of their apprenticeship

Reston Inn v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

28 Va. Cir. 301 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Jul 6, 1992

Board of Supervisors of Washington County v. Booher, et al., 232 Va. 478 (1987). … Masterson v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Virginia Beach, et al., 233 Va. 37 (1987). As indicated above, a legislative act by the Board of Supervisors would be necessary to change the zoning of the property.

Reading Community Club v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals

46 Pa. D. & C.5th 249 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Mar 26, 2015

Art. 8, § 2(2)(v). In the case of Mesivtah Eitz Chaim of Bobov, Inc. v. … The Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Unionville-Chadds Ford School District v.

Reddick v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

58 Misc. 2d 970 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1969

(Matter of Jablon v. Board of Regents, *972 271 App. Div. 369 , 373 [3d. Dept.], affd. 296 N. Y. 1027 ). … The burden of proof is upon the applicant.’ ” (Matter of Jablon v. Board of Regents, supra, p. 373 .)

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Virginia State Water Control Board

19 Va. Cir. 307 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Apr 25, 1990

See Tidewater Psychiatric Institute, Inc. v. Buttery, supra, *311 and D’Alessio v. Lukhard, 5 Va. App. 404 , 363 S.E.2d 715 (1988). … The purpose is that *312 articulated by Justice Powell in his dissent in UAW v.

Sweet v. Board of Regents of the Regency University System

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 28, 1974