Case law

Fehl v. Board of Education of the City School District

23 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 409 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jun 28, 1920

The effect of conferring power to contract upon a board of education is stated in Kraft v. Board, of Education, 67 N. J. Law Rep., 512. … In Gosline v.

State ex rel. Bryce Furnace Co. v. Board of Education

14 Ohio C.C. 15 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1897

It avers that at the next meeting of the board .after he bids were received, which was held on the 11th day •of January, 1897, the day on which the bids were to be filed *18 with the clerk of the board, they were laid over … that it has demanded of the board that it should award the'contract to the relator.

People ex rel. Daniels v. Board of Commissioners of Excise

3 Park. Cr. 501 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1857

The board for Albany county having already been in session ten days, have no further power to act as such board of excise during the present year. The motion must therefore be denied. Motion denied.

People ex rel. Village of Fulton v. Board of Supervisors

3 N.Y.S. 751 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1888

In the case of People v. Kearney, 47 Hun, 129 , this-court had occasion to examine that statute, and it was there held that the statute did not prohibit the holding of courts on Saturday afternoon. … Nichols v. Kelsey, 13 Civil Proc. R. 154 ; Fries v. Coar, Id. 152 . This leaves for consideration only the question whether the writ could be-properly granted at an-adjourned special term of this court.

People ex rel. Tenth National Bank v. Board of Apportionment

5 Thomp. & Cook 382 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1875

Without a debt being due to the relator of the description given in the law, the board had no right to provide for the issuing of bonds on its account, and the relator itself had no interest in the act being done. … See also cases cited in People v. Green, ante, p. 376, decided at this term. A controversy of this character appeared concerning the relator’s demand from the papers produced upon the hearing of the application.

Cash v. Bates

194 Misc. 873 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1949

(Matter of Woods v. Finegan, 246 App. Div. 271 ; Brown v. Craig, 209 App. Div. 11 .) … V, § 6; Hurley v. Board of Education of City of N. Y., 270 N. Y. 275 ; Matter of Carow v. Board of Education, 272 N. Y. 341 .) The Civil Service Commission is precluded from so doing by law. (Brown v. Craig, supra.)

Board of Education of Central School District No. 1 v. Cole

176 Misc. 509 · New York Supreme Court · May 14, 1941

The Commissioner has general jurisdiction over the board of education. (Education Law, §§ 90, 94.) … See, also, Matter of Levitch v. Board of Education, 243 N. Y. 373 , and Bullock v. Cooley, 225 id. 566.) A final order may be submitted confirming the orders • of the Commissioner. No costs.

Atlas Henrietta, LLC v. Town of Henrietta Zoning Board of Appeals

46 Misc. 3d 325 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 19, 2013

(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. … Trust v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 98 NY2d 190, 196 [2002].)

City of Buffalo v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

80 Misc. 2d 741 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1975

Co. v. Bohlinger, 308 N. Y. 174, 183 .) Under the previously enacted section 213 of the Civil Service Law, orders of the board are judicially reviewable under CPLR article 78. … Mary’s Hosp. v. Catherwood, supra; Matter of Guardian Life Ins. Co. v. Bohlinger, supra.)

State of Maine v. Brown

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 3, 2011

to Miranda v. … The Law Court has indicated in State v.

Northwestern Lehigh School District v. Election Board of Lehigh County

1 Pa. D. & C.4th 327 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Oct 21, 1988

The concept of such a school has been under consideration by the board since the mid-1970’s. … Thus, in Upper Saucon Township v. The Election Board of Lehigh County, 83-C-279, following Lansdale v. Election Board of Montgomery, 7 D.

Brady v. Mayor of New York

35 How. Pr. 81 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1867

By the first section of the act of Aprid 23d, 1867, commonly called the city “tax levy” for that year, the board of supervisors of the county of New York, among other sums of money, were authorized and directed to levy and … By the 5th section, it is declared that “the mayor, aider-men and commonalty of the city of New York shall not be liable upon any contract made, or expenditure authorized, or liability incurred, by any board, department,

Mukerji v. City of Reading Charter Review Board

83 Pa. D. & C.4th 145 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Mar 26, 2007

The case of Caln Nether Company L.P. v. Board of Supervisors of Thornbury Township, 840 A.2d 484, 496 (Pa. … McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service Commission, 424 U.S. 645 , 96 S.Ct. 1154 , 47 L.Ed.2d 366 (1976); Nevitt v. Board of Supervisors of Logan Township, 32 Pa. Commw. 474 , 379 A.2d 1072 (1977).

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Potsdam Board of Assessors

160 Misc. 2d 606 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1994

Co. v Board of Assessors ( 81 NY2d 1029 [1993]), which held transmission and distribution property is not used primarily to "sell” a utility service as that term is used in section 485-b and therefore a utility is not entitled … (Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v Town of Onondaga, 63 NY2d 786 *610 [1984].)

People ex rel. Sinclair v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Center

152 Misc. 2d 928 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991

Brown v New York State Div. of Parole, 70 NY2d, at 399 .) … Brown v Smith, 115 AD2d 255 [4th Dept 1985]; People ex rel.

Limpert v. Day

7 Ohio Misc. 231 · Cuyahoga County Probate Court · Jun 28, 1966

Walsh v. Barron, Treas., 61 Ohio St. 15 ; Domito v. Maumee, 140 Ohio St. 229 . … Shafer, v. Otter, Surveyor, 106 Ohio St. 415 ; Baxter v. Van Houter, Auditor, 115 Ohio St. 288 ; Domito v. Village of Maumee, supra.

White v. Board of Education, Union Free School District No. 3

74 Misc. 2d 171 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1973

Brown, 5 N Y 2d 51 [1958]), or because it was arbitrary and capricious (Matter of Le Tarte v. Board of Educ. of Lake Pleasant Cent. School Dist., 65 Misc 2d 147 [Sup. … City v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 23 N Y 2d 458 [1969]).

State ex rel. Coal & Coke Co. v. Board, of Education

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 735 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1895

If an advertisement was necessary, the statute gives the board such right. If it is not required, it had the right to make such stipulations as it chose. In ■ this, the case differs from those decided in Beaver v. … Trustees, 19 Ohio St., 97 , and American Clock Co. v. Licking Co., 31 Ohio St., 415 , in which the statutes under which the proceedings was had, required the contract to be made with the lowest bidder. Writ refused.

State ex rel. Bryce Furnace Co. v. Board of Education

7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 338 · Lucas Circuit Court · Feb 9, 1897

A copy of *339 that bid, together with the proposed contract, is attached to the petition v and made a. part thereof. … In connection with that statute there is another which we think has some application, and that is section 794, which provides: ‘ ‘ When any board of commissions, board of trustees, officers, or board of diiectors of the state

Plainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education

78 Misc. 2d 975 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1973