Case law

Trustees of the Presbytery v. Board of Revision of Taxes

5 Pa. D. & C.2d 226 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 17, 1955

The appellee board on January 25, 1955, granted exemption of $10,900 of the assessment for taxes for 1955 but made $3,000 taxable because a portion of the dwelling is used for residential purposes. … The appeal is hereby sustained and the board of revision of taxes is hereby ordered to grant exemption from taxation to premises no. 705 Pine Street, Philadelphia, for the taxable year 1955, and hereafter, so long as said

Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co. v. Board of County Commissioners

15 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 236 · Licking Circuit Court · Oct 15, 1912

City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

184 Misc. 512 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1944

It is not disputed that Conservation Order L. 41 issued by the War Production Board on April 9, 1942 ( 7 Fed. … , the date of the withdrawal of the respondents ’ appeal, as well as on August 4, 1942, the date of the approval of the petitioner’s application and plans for the erection of its theatre, the order of the War Production Board

People ex rel. McCombs v. Board Auditors of Deer Park

20 N.Y.S. 268 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1892

President of the Chemung Canal Bank v. Board of Supervisors

1 How. Pr. 162 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1845

New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Board of Supervisors

37 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 222 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

People ex rel. Second Avenue Railroad v. Board of Commissioners

38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 316 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1883

Proceedings and order of the Board of Commissioners of Public Parks affirmed, with costs.

Reddick v. Board of Regents of the University of New York

58 Misc. 2d 970 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1969

(Matter of Jablon v. Board of Regents, *972 271 App. Div. 369 , 373 [3d. Dept.], affd. 296 N. Y. 1027 ). … The burden of proof is upon the applicant.’ ” (Matter of Jablon v. Board of Regents, supra, p. 373 .)

State of Maine v. Brown

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 6, 2011

1/1\­ I STATE OF MAINE v. … State v. Lafond, 2002 ME 124, errerr 6, 9, 802 A.2d 425, 428-29; see also State v. McDonald, 2010 ME 102, err 9, 6 A.3d 283, 285-86.

Buchanan County School Board v. Monk Supply Co.

19 Va. Cir. 388 · Buchanan County Circuit Court · May 25, 1990

School Boards are not identical to the state but, like counties, are subdivisions of the state. Section 8.01-231 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, is not applicable. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Burns v. … Section 8.01-230 of the Code and the case of Harbour Gate Owners Association v.

Sweet v. Board of Regents of the Regency University System

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 312 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 28, 1974

Sher v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals

1 Pa. D. & C.5th 56 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County · Sep 1, 2006

Radecke v. York County Board of Assessment, 798 A.2d 265, 267 (Pa. Commw. 2002). The assessment law does provide authority for changing assessments in certain circumstances. … The general law regarding retroactive application of a statute is set forth in the case of Moyer v. Berks County Board of Assessment Appeals, 803 A.2d 833, 842 (Pa.

Lynch v. Spotsylvania County Board of Zoning Appeals

42 Va. Cir. 164 · Spotsylvania County Circuit Court · Apr 15, 1997

Some of the homeowners in Fox Point appealed the zoning administrator’s determination to the County Board of Zoning Appeals (the BZA). … As noted in Salem Fields v. Spotsylvania County Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 40 Va.

Merritt v. Thompson

1 Hilt. 550 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Apr 15, 1858

Green v. Brown, 2 Strange, 1199 ; Koster v. Innes, Ry. & Mo. 331 ; 1 Park on Insurance, 105, 106, 107 ; Best on Presumptions, 238. … King v. Paddock, 18 John. 143 .

Guest v. King George County Board of Supervisors

40 Va. Cir. 377 · King George County Circuit Court · Oct 9, 1996

Rule of Court 3:8; Carwile v. Richmond Newspapers, Inc., 196 Va. 1 , 82 S.E.2d 588 (1954). … Patterson v. CSX Transportation, 245 Va. 483, 487 , 429 S.E.2d 215, 218 (1993). See also, Loyola Fed. Savings v. Herndon, 218 Va. 803, 805 , 241 S.E.2d 752, 753 (1978); Last v. Virginia State Board of Medicine, 14 Va.

People ex rel. Hopkins v. Board of Commissioners of Excise

25 N.Y.S. 322 · New York County Courts · Jul 15, 1893

The powers of the boards over this subject are judicial, and not legislative. My views in this regard differ somewhat from those stated in the opinion in People v. … Justice Parker in People v. Symonds, 4 Misc. Rep. 9 , 23 N. Y.

Sickles v. New Rochelle Board of Health

48 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 408 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1886

(Wallack v. Juvenile Society, 67 N. Y., 23 .) If the action is to be considered as also seeking to restrain a trespass by defendant (which is very doubtful.), still it is not a proper case for injunction. … The matter of drains and cess-pools is properly within the cognizance of the board of health.

Snyder v. New York State Board of Regents

31 Misc. 3d 556 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2010

of IBM, the United Way and the Coca-Cola Company; and (v) service as a board member of the Advertising Council and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. … v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist.

Board of Commissioners of Excise v. Merchant

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 19 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1884

It was so held in The State v. Jarrett ( 35 Mo., 357 ), and in this court in the unreported case of Stark v. Lansing, decided in March, 1884. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Smith, P.

Conewago Township Board of Supervisors v. Lower Dauphin School District

68 Pa. D. & C.2d 88 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jul 16, 1974

The school board is resisting the effort of the Township to collect a portion of the tax for the period from July 1, 1973, to June 30, 1974, because it contends the township did not give the 45-day notice required by law. … Our reading of the act is supported by dicta in the case of Plains Township v. Wilkes-Barre Area School District, 7 Comm. Ct. 49 (1972). It was held that, under the circumstances of that case, notice was not required.