Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.61s

  • Unitarian Universalist Church of Central Nassau v. Shorten

    63 Misc. 2d 978 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1970

    The first is the rule that municipal corporations are creatures of, and have only such powers as, are delegated to them by the State (Seaman v. Fedourich, 16 N Y 2d 94, 101; Matter of Brown v. … Respondents concede, as indeed they must in the face of decisions such as Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v. Brown (22 N Y 2d 488); Matter of Diocese of Rochester v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Sterling Information Service, Ltd. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

    60 Misc. 2d 45 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1969

    A petition and notice shall be served on the state board, by delivering two copies thereof to a member of such board * * *. … A proceeding to review a special franchise assessment shall be maintained against the state board and no such proceeding shall be maintained against any other board or officer unless otherwise directed hy the supreme court

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. City of Lookport v. Board of Supervisors

    1 N.Y.S. 460 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1888

    The board of supervisors refused to levy the tax for the payment of the claim to the city. … People v. Supervisors Otsego Co., 51 N. Y. 401 ; People v. Supervisors Livingston Co., 68 N. Y. 114 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Phelps v. Town Board of the Alabama

    174 Misc. 2d 889 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1997

    (See, Matter of Young v Board of Trustees, 221 AD2d 975, 976 , affd 89 NY2d 846 .) … V.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Omabuild N. V. v. Board of Estimate

    116 Misc. 2d 566 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1982

    Y. v Spatt, 68 AD2d 112 , affd 51 NY2d 449 ; cf. Hale v City of Utica, 61 AD2d 885 .) … Y. v Spatt, supra.) The CPC and the Board of Estimate did consider the relationship of the historic district designation to the zoning.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trask v. Jones

    5 Bosw. 62 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jun 25, 1859

    They were, of course, so ordered with the knowledge of Brown & Codman, the owners who had made this contract to sell her. … Belknap Smith, 88 Wall street, or to the captain or agent on board, at Pier 4, North River.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scruggs v. Harris

    10 Va. Cir. 162 · Henrico County Circuit Court · Aug 6, 1987

    Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, 462 U.S. 791 , 798 n. 4 (1983). … See, i.e., Forrer v. Brown, 221 Va. 1098 (1981); Harris v. Deal, 189 Va. 675 (1949); Richmond v. Monument Avenue Development Corp., 184 Va. 152 (1945). In Forrer v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Orion Sporting Group, L.L.C. v. Nelson County Board of Supervisors

    68 Va. Cir. 195 · Amherst County Circuit Court · Jun 29, 2005

    Town of Painter, 239 Va. 343, 347 (1990); Board of Supervisors v. Carper, 200 Va. 653, 660 (1959). … In order for this argument to succeed, some benefit to the Board must be proven. Holston Corp. v. Wise County, 131 Va. 142, 159 (1921).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opladen v. Town of Islip

    172 Misc. 726 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1939

    At a meeting of .the town board of Islip, held on October 13,1936; the following resolution was-duly adopted: “Resolved that bids-for the construction of .the approaches at Brown’s Creek, - Bayport, be' awarded to the lowest … It was not a mere improvement of the roadway, as was involved in Stenson v. City of Mount Vernon ( 104 App. Div. 17 ) and Matter of Stuart v. Village of Lynbrook ( 169 Misc. 167 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cotroneo v. Monroe County Board of Elections

    166 Misc. 2d 63 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1995

    Since the General Construction Law should be read into every statute subsequently enacted unless the wording of such later statute plainly expresses a contrary intent (see, O’Keeffe v Dugan, 185 App Div 53 [1918], affd 225 … NY 667 [1919]), the Boards of Elections throughout the State should effect a statutory change requiring petition signatures be cursive.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Schwartz Landes Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    124 Misc. 2d 1067 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1984

    Petitioner Schwartz Landes Associates (the owner-landlord of the subject building) moves pursuant to CPLR article 78 to have a determination of the respondent Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) vacated or, in the alternative … Klostermann v Cuomo, NYLJ, April 5, 1984, p 7, col 3.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Richelieu v. Kirby

    48 Va. Cir. 260 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Mar 5, 1999

    Respondent Sandee Strobel is a board member of the Humane Society. Respondent Sharon Hottle is a board member of the Humane Society and also an employee. … Multifariousness Despite the fact that I previously ruled that the Amended Bill of Complaint was not multifarious, I have revisited the issue in light of the holding in Brown v. Bedford City Land & Imp.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Grace v. Lockland City Board of Education

    25 Ohio Law. Abs. 90 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Sep 20, 1937

    State ex Wright v Board of Education of Cincinnati et, (25 Abs —), case No. 5185 of our Court of Appeals, decided June 21, 1937, in principle is controlling. … The board of education refused to grant the application.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Continental Hotel, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    11 Fla. Supp. 2d 139 · Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · Jul 19, 1985

    Silver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 255 Atl.2d (Penn. 1969). *141 Section 12 of Miami Beach Zoning Ordinance No. 1891 provides, in part, as follows: 12-3 Non-Conforming Use of Buildings. A. … See State v. Szymanski, 189 Atl. 2d 514 (Conn. Ap. 1962); Magness v. Caddo Parish Police Jury, 318 So.2d 117 (La. 2d Cir. 1975); City of Crowley v. Prejean, 173 So.2d 832 (La. 3rd Cir. 1965). In State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. County of Niagara

    111 Misc. 2d 961 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1981

    The real issue here is whether the school district’s relationship with the City Civil Service Commission is one which is mandated by State law or one of voluntary choice by the school board. … (See Matter of Board of Educ. v City of New York, 41 NY2d 535 ; Wambat Realty Corp. v State of New York, 41 NY2d 490 ; Robertson v Zimmermann, 268 NY 52 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Parkland College v. State of Illinois, Board of Vocational Education & Rehabilitation

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 659 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jun 16, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Board of Regents v. State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 278 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Feb 4, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Phillips Business Systems, Inc. v. State of Illinois, Pollution Control Board

    27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 363 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 24, 1972

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • State Board of Equalization & Assessment v. Kerwick

    92 Misc. 2d 547 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1977

    (See Matter of State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment v Kerwick, 91 Misc 2d 152 .) Respondent assessors move to dismiss the petition. … (Van Devanter v Long Island City, 139 NY 133 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Managers v. Bay Club of Long Beach, Inc.

    15 Misc. 3d 282 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 11, 2007

    (Kagan v Jacobs, 260 AD2d 442, 442 [2d Dept 1999]; see, Barry v Hildreth, 9 AJ)3d 341 [2d Dept 2004]; Tulley v Straus, 265 AD2d 399 [2d Dept 1999].) … The verification states Grasso is a member of the board of managers. . The precise item to be lined with copper cannot be determined.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.