Case law

Vecchiarello v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund

115 Misc. 2d 241 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1982

(Uniformed Firefighters Assn. v Beekman, 52 NY2d 463, 472-473.) … In Uniformed Firefighters Assn. v Beekman (supra, p 471) the court observed that the theory behind section 207-k of the General Municipal Law “as outlined by its proponents, is not only that heart conditions are an occupational

People ex rel. White v. Board of Sup'rs of Clinton

20 N.Y.S. 273 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1892

stated in the petition, and not denied in the return, that defendants, in passing on his accounts, declined to receive and consider evidence offered by him, and also failed to pass upon each item separately; citing People v. … People v. Fire Comrs, 73 N. Y. 437 . It will thus be seen that the return denies that the account in question was passed upon by the board of supervisors without evidence being taken.

Lehigh Gas Corp. v. Stroud Township Zoning Hearing Board

40 Pa. D. & C.5th 265 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Jul 31, 2014

It is well settled that a zoning board’s interpretation of its own zoning ordinance is entitled to great weight and deference from a reviewing court.” Lancaster Two v. … Crown Communications v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Glenfield, 679 A.2d 271, 274 (Pa. *271 Cmwlth. 1996) aff’d, 705 A.2d 427 (1997).

People ex rel. Fuller v. Board of Supervisors of Seneca County

18 How. Pr. 461 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1860

And now, on filing the return of the board, which sets forth the facts above stated, the relator, with the consent of the counsel for the board, without further notice, moves for a peremptory writ of mandamus. … The case relied on by the counsel for the board, Yates agt. The Canal Board, (13 Barbour's S. C. Rep. 432), does not sustain their position.

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Select Operating Corp.

183 Misc. 480 · New York Supreme Court · May 10, 1944

(Matter of Stork Restaurant, Inc. v. Boland, 282 N. Y. 256 .) … before- the Board and may be considered by it (New York State Labor Relations Bd. v.

Beaners Restaurant, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Liquor Control Board

38 Pa. D. & C.5th 195 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · May 6, 2014

v. … PLCB v. Althouse, 503 A.2d 90, 91 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986).

People ex rel. Horvay v. Board of Education

156 N.Y.S. 65 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1914

Charter, §,§ 1068, 1093, 1100; Farrell v. Board of Education, 67 Misc. Rep. 187 , 122 N. Y. Supp. 289 .

Straessle v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

71 Pa. D. & C. 266 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 15, 1950

Brown then took an appeal to the zoning board of adjustment. … Brown.

Williams v. Bedford County Board of Elections

69 Pa. D. & C. 466 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bedford County · May 20, 1949

Pittsburgh, 229 Pa. 36 ) or, (2) the preliminary ordinances actually adopted were improperly worded: Bullitt v. Philadelphia, 230 Pa. 544 ; Beaver et al. v. Hile et al., 12 D. & C. 83. … Elections should not be judicially overturned because of some innocuous deviation from statutory require *470 ments (Oncken et al. v.

Burnett v. Snyder

41 Jones & S. 342 · The Superior Court of New York City · Aug 1, 1876

Brown Snyder, against whose property attachments had- been obtained, on the alleged ground of his non-residence. … King v. Leighton ( 58 N. Y. 883 ), is an authority to the effect, that a party to an action cannot be compelled to submit to an examination, at the instance of the adverse party, save as a general witness in the cause.

Chatfield v. Board of Revision of Taxes

43 Pa. D. & C. 274 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 17, 1941

R. v. Balthaser, 119 Pa. 472 ; Penna., etc., R. R. Co. v. Cleary, 125 Pa. 442 ; Kossler v. Pittsburgh, etc., Ry. Co., 208 Pa. 50 ; Hamory v. Penna., etc., R. R. Co., 222 Pa. 631 ; Kleppner v. Pittsburg, etc., R. R. … Co. v. Fortney, 90 Pa. 323, 328 .

Diedrick v. Kean

34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 103 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1882

Anderson Construction Co. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

35 Misc. 2d 948 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1962

It is not the law as respondent assumes that a Zoning Board of Appeals in acting npon an application for a special exception need make no findings and can reserve them for a return. See Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. … Bush, 6 A D 2d 200; Matter of Syosset Holding Corp. v. Schlimm, 4 A D 2d 766; Matter of Bach v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 282. App. Div. 879).

North Eastern Fruit Council v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

124 Misc. 2d 67 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1984

They bring this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the agricultural use values promulgated by the respondent State Board of Equalization and Assessment (State Board) for the year 1983. … The statute does not, however, prohibit the State Board from additionally determining separate agricultural values for different types of land having different agricultural uses.

Syquia v. Board of Education of Harpursville Central School District

149 Misc. 2d 463 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1991

(Matter of Sandor v Nyquist, 45 AD2d 122 [3d Dept 1974].) Such is the case here. … (Matter of Conley v Ambach, 93 AD2d 902 [3d Dept 1983]; US Const 5th, 14th Amends.)

Snell v. Newell

42 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 664 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1885

DeFilippo v. Board of Police Commissioners

30 Conn. Supp. 290 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · May 7, 1973

This action purports to be an ■appeal under § 52-7 of the General Statutes which provides: “The court of common pleas shall have *291 exclusive jurisdiction of all appeals from the doings of any municipal board, officer or … Long v. Zoning Commission, 133 Conn. 248 . Judgment may enter erasing the appeal as to the defendants Osso and Smith.

Zelvin v. Zoning Board of Appeals

30 Conn. Supp. 157 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Mar 19, 1973

Morningside Assn. v. Planning & Zoning Board, 162 Conn. 154, 158 ; Malafronte v. Planning & Zoning Board, 155 Conn. 205, 209 . … Enterprises, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 280, 282 ; Celentano v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 136 Conn. 584, 587 .

Decilla v. Zoning Board of Appeals

27 Conn. Supp. 112 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Apr 25, 1967

Sun Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 154 Conn. 32, 33, 35 . The record of the proceedings establishes that the defendant board received the applications on August 17, 1966. … Blanos v. Kulesva, 107 Conn. 476, 483 (dissenting opinion). The board’s failure to comply with the statutory provision as to the hearing date precluded its taking action on the application. Slagle v.

Koslow v. Board of Zoning Appeals

19 Conn. Supp. 303 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Feb 23, 1955

Zoning Appeals, 136 Conn. 303, 306 ; Talmadge v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 141 Conn. 639, 644 . … The board is an administrative agency which acts in such cases as a quasi-judicial body. Burr v. Rago, 120 Conn. 287, 292 .