Case law

In re Appeal of Brown

28 Pa. D. & C.5th 216 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · Mar 12, 2013

Buhl Foundation v. Board of Property Assessment, 407 Pa. 567, 570 , 180 A.2d 900, 902 (1962); Willow Valley Manor, Inc. v. Lancaster County Board of Assessment Appeals, 810 A.2d 720, 723-724 (2002). … Deitch Co. v. Board of Property Assessment, 471 Pa. 213, 221 , 209 A.2d 397, 402 (1965).

Turinsky v. Ottawa Board of County Commissioners

24 Ohio Misc. 2d 22 · Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas · Jun 21, 1985

The motion of defendant Board of County Commissioners of Ottawa County (“board”) requesting summary judgment that the complaint as to it be dismissed with prej *23 udice has been considered and is overruled. … See Marrek v. Cleveland Metroparks Bd. of Commrs. (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 194 ; and Zents v.

People ex rel. Keyser v. Board of Education

32 Misc. 63 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1900

See People v. Hubbell, 38 App. Div. 194 . … Co. v. Roesch, 27 Misc. Rep. 44 ; People ex rel. Wright v. Coffin, 7 Hun, 608 , 609; Clark v. Miller, 54 N. Y. 534 ; People v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 63 How. Pr. 296 .

People ex rel. Toms v. Board of Sup'rs

121 N.Y.S. 636 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1910

BROWN, J. On December 31,1909, a writ of certiorari was issuedi to review the action of the board of supervisors in levying the sum of $1,667.36 as taxes upon the taxable property of the town of Tonawan— da. … People v. Supervisors, 43 Barb. 232 ; Bellinger v. Gray, 51 N. Y. 610 ; People v. Hagadorn, 104 N. Y. 516 , 10 N. E. 891 ; Ne-ha-sa-ni v. Lloyd, 7 App. Div. 359 , 40 N. Y. Supp. 58 .

CMJ Sheffield, Inc. v. Pa. Liquor Control Board

42 Pa. D. & C.5th 225 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 17, 2014

Colville v. Allegheny County Retirement Board, 926 A.2d 426 (Pa. 2007). As a note, this is not a “relitigation” of the citations, but an appeal from the decision not to renew appellant’s liquor license. … Renewal of a liquor license is not automatic and the board may refuse to renew a license for several reasons, including because the licensee has one or more adjudicated citations. Goodfellas, Inc. v.

Brown v. Amica Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 16, 2016

Brown v. State of Maine, 11-CV-426 JD, 2012 WL 5463087 (D. Me. Nov. 7, 2012). … Brown v. State ofMaine, 11-CV-426 JD, 2012 WL 5463087 (D. Me. Nov. 7, 2012).

Cline v. Board of Trustees of Schenectady County Community College

76 Misc. 2d 536 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1973

(See Matter of New York Post Corp. v. Leibowitz, 2 N Y 2d 677; Matter of Werfel v. Fitzgerald, 23 A D 2d 306; Holton v. Board of Supervisors of County of Monroe, 245 App. Div. 144 ; Matter of Egan v. … Board of Water Supply, 205 N. Y. 147 ; Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Hoyt, 202 Misc. 43 and Matter of Winston v. Mangan, 72 Misc 2d 280 .)

Cherryfield Foods v. Brown

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 3, 2005

Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19, 9 12. Although Mr. … Brown has not set forth a prima facie case for recovery in quantum meruit, and summary judgment on this count is proper. Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19 at ¶ 6; cf. Stanley v. Hancock County Mr.

Tipon v. Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau

82 Misc. 2d 657 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1975

Andrew V. Siracuse, J. … Siegal v Dros ( 11 NY2d 167 ).

Holbrook v. Wilson

17 Bosw. 64 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jan 22, 1859

(Th e Central Bank of Brooklyn v. Lang, 1 Bosw. R., 202.) … It is similar to the rule declared in The Bank of the United States v. Davis. ( 2 Hill, 459 .) The defendants have fallen short of doing this.

People ex rel. Becker v. Board of Education

110 Misc. 587 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1920

Callahan v. Board of Education, 174 N. Y. 169 , although holding it could not be exercised adversely to a permanent license without a hearing on charges and a determination of inefficiency in the higher grade.

Cobb v. Board of Appeals of the City of Buffalo

128 Misc. 67 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1926

It may be assumed that the ordinance, properly administered, is constitutional *68 (Matter of Wulfsohn v. Burden, 241 N. Y. 288 ); that it has the force of a statute (Matter of Stubbe v. … (Welch v. City of Niagara Falls, 210 App. Div. 170 ; Village of Stamford v. Fisher, 140 N. Y. 187 .)

People ex rel. Spaulding v. Board of Supervisors

34 Misc. 740 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1901

That defense maintains that Maybee, the assignor, could not place indigent children without license from the State Board of Charities. … Woodworth *743 v. Bennett, 43 N. Y. 274 ; Murray v. Beard, 102 id. 505; Beebe v. Supervisors of Sullivan County, 64 Hun, 377 ; Heughes v. Board of Education, 37 App. Div. 180 .

Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. v. City Council

16 Misc. 3d 530 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 11, 2007

(See discussion of federal legislation, Forest Park II v Hadley, 336 F3d at 728-730.) The Real Estate Board relies on Forest Park II v Hadley in support of its argument that Local Law 79 is preempted by federal law. … (See Franklin Tower One, L.L.C. v N.M., 157 NJ 602, 725 A2d 1104 [1999]; Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v Sullivan Assoc., 250 Conn 763, 739 A2d 238 [1999]; Attorney Gen. v Brown, 400 Mass 826, 511 NE2d 1103 [

Karulski v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 295 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 7, 1966

This is an action brought by Joseph Karulski, as Administrator of the Estate of Adella Karulski, deceased, against the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois under the Illinois Wrongful Death Act, 1961 Ill.

Arnoul v. Wallenpaupack School District Board of Directors

37 Pa. D. & C.4th 32 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Pike County · Mar 21, 1997

Mascaro v. Youth Study Center, 514 Pa. 351, 361 , 523 A.2d 1118, 1123 (1987). … See Canon-McMillan School District v. Bioni, supra at 322 , 561 A.2d at 855 .

State of Maine v. Brown

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 14, 2007

':)c>7 STATE OF MAINE, v. DECISION TYSHIEM BROWN, Defendant. FINDINGS 1. Det. … Brown that they were starting with a clean slate and nothing that had been said earlier in the day mattered. 8. Mr. Brown felt he couldn't leave the interrogation. Mr. Brown concluded that Det.

Lindquist v. Buckingham Township Board of Supervisors

48 Pa. D. & C.4th 225 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Jan 19, 2000

Coretsky v. Board of Commissioners of Butler Township, 103 Pa. … Bensalem v. Blank, 114 Pa.

Klem v. Plains Township Zoning Hearing Board

45 Pa. D. & C.3d 62 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County · Jun 9, 1986

A landowner whose property is directly involved in a zoning appeal is not granted automatic party status in an appeal from a decision of a zoning board, despite the fact that he participated as a party before the board. … Gilchrist v. Zoning Hearing Board of Old Forge Borough, 83 Pa. Commw. 27 , 475 A.2d *65 1366 (1984). Such being the case, Frank Merlino is not properly a party in this appeal with standing to object to Mrs.

Rampp v. Luzerne Co. Assessment & Valuation Board

41 Pa. D. & C.3d 166 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County · Feb 25, 1986

Commw. 292 , 437 A.2d 1291 (1981), and The Church of Our Savior v. … We also find that the case of Christian Literature Crusade, Inc. v. Board of Assessment, 17 Pa. Commw. 63 , 328 A.2d 896 (1974), is factually dissimilar.