Case law

People ex rel. Russell v. County Board of Canvassers

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 390 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1887

He presented it to the Board of County Canvassers, and that body proceeded to take action upon it. … Order affirmed with costs and the board of canvassers directed to use the, return filed with the county clerk.

Dorn v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

28 Va. Cir. 133 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · May 7, 1992

Under Hylton Enterprises, Inc. v. … The Board of Supervisors argues instead that under cases such as Knowlton v.

Norton v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

27 Va. Cir. 315 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Apr 8, 1992

For the reasons that follow, the Court overrules the Board’s Demurrer and Plea in Bar. The Board demurs on several grounds. … Although Virginia case law may require Norton to prove manifest error or a total disregard of controlling evidence by the Board, see Arlington County Board v.

Board of Supervisors v. NKF Engineering, Inc.

24 Va. Cir. 98 · Campbell County Circuit Court · May 14, 1991

Citing Portsmouth v. … In Newport News v.

Hayes v. Stafford County Board of Supervisors

23 Va. Cir. 143 · Virginia Circuit Court · Feb 15, 1991

In Brown v. … Brown v. Haley, supra. The language of the Easement Agreement contained no restrictions or limitations as to use.

Allen v. Greensville County Board of Supervisors

24 Va. Cir. 398 · Greensville County Circuit Court · Sep 5, 1991

Co. v. Campbell, 89 Va. 396 (1892), and First Virginia Bank v. Commonwealth, 212 Va. 654 (1972).

Board of Directors v. Crossland Savings F.S.B.

23 Va. Cir. 4 · Virginia Circuit Court · Aug 3, 1990

Harbour Gate Owners’ Assn., et al. v. Berg, et al., 232 Va. 98 (1986). … See, Cheatle v.

National Board of Marine Underwriters v. National Bank

29 N.Y.S. 698 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Jul 2, 1894

Welsh v. Bank, 73 N. Y. 424 ; Shipman v. Bank, 126 N. Y. 320 , 27 N. E. 371 ; Frank v. Bank, 84 N. Y. 213 ; Quincey v. White, 63 N. Y. 370 .

New York State Labor Relations Board v. Charman Service Corp.

201 Misc. 291 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1951

If respondent’s operations affect interstate commerce, the national board’s assertion of jurisdiction supersedes all action by the State board. (La Crosse Tel. Corp. v. Wisconsin Labor Relations Bd., 336 U. … Stafford v. Wallace, 258 U. S. *312 495, 516 ; Chicago Board of Trade v. Olsen, 262 U. S. 1, 33 .

Loudoun County Board of Supervisors v. Lunn

24 Va. Cir. 13 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Oct 19, 1990

Any evidence as to the potential impact on market value which the acquisition of the landowner’s tract might have to Kettler and Scott, as part of a proffer package subject to review and approval of the Board, would be purely … As opposed to the fixed fees established for a General Receiver, the costs under consideration in Ryan v.

Ruddy v. Springfield Township Zoning Hearing Board

77 Pa. D. & C.4th 206 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Oct 14, 2005

Collier Stone Company v. Zoning Hearing Board for Township of Collier, 710 A.2d 123, 125 (Pa. Commw. 1998). … See Bray v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 48 Pa. Commw. 523 , 410 A.2d 909 (1980).

Finger Lakes Preservation Ass'n v. Town Board

25 Misc. 3d 1115 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 2009

(Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 67 NY2d 400 [1986].) … (Aldrich v Pattison, 107 AD2d 258, 266 [2d Dept 1985].)

Brown Bark I, L.P. v. Metroflor Transportation Services, Inc.

18 Misc. 3d 513 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 2007

(Byrnes v Scott, 175 AD2d 786, 787 [1st Dept 1991]; Gibson v American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, 125 AD2d 65, 74 [1st Dept 1987].) … (Kennerly v Campbell Chain Co., Campbell Chain Div. McGraw-Edison Co., 133 AD2d 669, 670 [2d Dept 1987].) *518 Finally, defendants do not contest the validity of the transaction between Brown Bark I and Bank of America.

Board of Supervisors v. U.S. Home Corp.

18 Va. Cir. 181 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Aug 14, 1989

District of Columbia v. Air Florida, Inc., 750 F.2d 1077 (D.C. Cir. 1984); City of Flagstaff v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad Co., 719 F.2d 322 (9th Cir. 1983); City of Bridgeton v. B.P. Oil, Inc., 146 N.J. … City of Pittsburgh v. Equitable Gas Co., 512 A.2d 83, 84 (Pa. Comwlth. 1986). A municipal corporation may, however, avoid this nonrecovery rule by statute, e.g., Town of Cherry Hill v.

Stockwicz v. Corning Community College

90 Misc. 2d 55 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1977

(Brown v North Country Community Coll., 63 Misc 2d 442 ; Horacek-Hayden v County of Monroe, ( 65 Misc 2d 196 .) … (Matter of Weinstein v Caso, 44 AD2d 690 .) Pursuant to CPLR 2001, the court directs that the defendant in this proceeding is correctly designated henceforth as Board of Trustees of Corning Community College.

City of Lackawanna v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

42 Misc. 2d 58 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1963

Ruppert Realty Corp. v. Cantor ( 115 Misc. 519 , affd. 204 App. Div. 863 ); Matter of Leonhard Michel Brewing Co. v. Cantor (119 Misc: 854); People ex rel. International Salt Co. v. … As the court stated in Matter of Martin v.

Henry v. Arlington County Board of Supervisors

14 Va. Cir. 351 · Arlington County Circuit Court · Mar 1, 1989

Complainant relies upon Lawrence Transfer and Storage Corporation v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Augusta County, 229 Va. 568 (1985). … decision made by a Board of Zoning Appeals.

Grandview Heights Ass'n v. Board of Assessors of Greece

176 Misc. 2d 901 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1998

(See, e.g., Matter of Broadway-Saranac Lake Corp. v Board of Assessors, 43 AD2d 649 [3d Dept 1973].) Petitioner bears the burden of establishing by substantial evidence that its property was overvalued. … Div.] v Unmack, 242 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 1997]; Matter of South Slope Holding Corp. v Board of Assessment Review, 244 AD2d 891 [4th Dept 1997].)

WMW Investment v. Board of Zoning Appeals

14 Va. Cir. 32 · Winchester County Circuit Court · Mar 31, 1988

Matthews v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 218 Va. 270 -284, 237 S.E.2d 128 at 136 (1977). The issue in controversy, is whether WMW has direct access to U.S. … Mooreland v. Young, 197 Va. 771 at 775 , 91 S.E.2d 438 at 441 (1956); Lawrence Transf. & Storage Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 229 Va. 568 , 331 S.E.2d 460 (1985); 82 Am. Jur. 2d. Zoning and Planning § 68, p. 498.

Sports Arena Employees v. New York State Labor Relations Board

25 Misc. 2d 629 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1960

(Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Bd., supra; National Labor Relations Bd. v. Denver Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, 341 U. S. 675 ; Mabee v. White Plains Pub. Co., 327 U. S. 178 ; National Labor Relations Bd. v. … The Board was correct in considering Saratoga’s operation collectively for jurisdictional purposes. (See National Labor Relations Bd. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U. S. 1 ; National Labor Relations Bd. v.