Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

2.56s

  • Adrovet v. Brunswick City School District Board of Education

    106 Ohio Misc. 2d 81 · Medina County Court of Common Pleas · Nov 19, 1999

    Bd. of Edn. v. Formani (Mar. 23, 1988), Medina App. … Brown (later Justice Brown) was whether a student could be suspended or expelled from school beyond the current semester when the statute at that time provided that “[n]o pupil shall be suspended dr expelled from any school

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Haven v. Wentworth

    2 N.H. 93 · Superior Court of New Hampshire · Sep 15, 1819

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Stoltzfoos v. Bart Township Zoning Hearing Board

    79 Pa. D. & C.4th 302 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Mar 1, 2006

    Hudachek v. Zoning Hearing Board of Newtown Borough, 147 Pa. Commw. 566 , 570 n.2, 608 A.2d 652 , 654 n.2 (1992). … If the record demonstrates substantial evidence, a court is bound by the board’s findings and may not substitute its judgment for that of the board. Zoning Hearing Board of Sadsbury Township v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Braunstein v. Board of Examiners of Nursing Home Administrators

    105 Misc. 2d 91 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1980

    (Matter of Yannett v Berman, 65 AD2d 667 , revd on other grounds 49 NY2d 750 .) … (Matter of Sturman v Public Health Council, 58 AD2d 389 ; Matter of Bergman v Whalen, 89 Misc 2d 237 , affd 60 AD2d 687 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Amoco Oil Co. v. Zoning Appeals Board

    30 Va. Cir. 159 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Feb 5, 1993

    Howe brown This case is before the Court on a Writ of Certiorari filed by Petitioner, Amoco Oil Company. … See, e.g., Cook v. City of Falls Church, 244 Va. 107 (1992); Ames v. Town of Painter, 239 Va. 343 (1990); see also National Mem. Park v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 232 Va. 89 (1986).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Castle Hill Beach Club, Inc. v. Arbury

    208 Misc. 622 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1955

    Brown has ousted the commission and this court of jurisdiction by virtue of *624 Executive Law (§ 300). … By analogy, however, it would seem that decisions affecting the State Relations Board would apply. The Appellate Division of this department (Matter of New York State Labor Relations Board v. Timen, 264 App.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Board of Education of the City School District v. Allen

    60 Misc. 2d 926 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1969

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Computer Sciences Corp. v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

    37 Va. Cir. 545 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · May 19, 1994

    Instead, it generally attacks the propriety of the Board’s claim for compensation in the event it must condemn CSC’s easement and disputes some of the Board’s factual allegations. 2 The Board has alleged the following: that … and to have those property owners served with copies of the Board’s cross-bill.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hughes-Bechtol, Inc. v. Board of Regents

    16 Ct. Cl. 56 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 17, 1986

    Simmons Company, Inc. v. … In Board of Education v. W.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bright Horizon House, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    121 Misc. 2d 703 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1983

    Temple v Brown, 22 NY2d 488, 493 .) … considerations (see Matter of Nassau Children’s House v Board of Zoning Appeals, 77 AD2d 898, 900 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Spagnol Enterprises, Inc. v. Franklin Township Zoning Hearing Board

    69 Pa. D. & C.2d 753 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County · May 9, 1973

    The appeal in question was filed by plaintiff on January 5, 1973, wherein plaintiff contends that the Franklin Township Zoning Hearing Board arbitrarily and capriciously ruled against its request for a variance to the Franklin … The records of the zoning board and plaintiff’s appeal filed in the court of common pleas, establishes that plaintiff holds an option to purchase the land in question from the record title holder; the appeal further alleges

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. New York State Board of Law Examiners

    109 Misc. 2d 735 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1981

    The exam scores are reported to the New York State Board of Law Examiners in the same manner and at the same time whether the exam is taken in State or out of State. … The State Board of Law Examiners uses the information sent to it by ETS for its own scaling procedures.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Collinwood Slovenian Home Co. v. Board of Liquor Control

    75 Ohio Law. Abs. 304 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Nov 13, 1956

    THE ORDER OF THE BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL (SUSPENDING APPELLANT’S D-l AND D-2 PERMITS), IS REVERSED AND THE APPEAL THEREFROM SUSTAINED. This is an appeal from an order of the Board of Liquor Control under §119.12 R. … The fact the permit holder was not present, made it all the more the duty of the Board, as well as this Court, to see that proper proof was adduced.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McGrath v. Board of Excise Com'rs

    18 N.Y.S. 884 · New York Supreme Court · May 9, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Seery v. Board of Police Commissioners

    55 How. Pr. 454 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1878

    examined by said board after the notice to him, thereof, by said board, in manner to be prescribed by said rules and regulations.” … Confessedly the charges were oral, and “ oral reports ” to the board, which the relator and the public never heard, which the board assumed to be true by requiring the relator to disprove them, and because, by a refusal of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Millspaugh v. Board of Town Auditors

    1 How. Pr. (n.s.) 224 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1884

    The relator presented to the board of town auditors of the town of Shawangunk a bill for services as one of the constables of that town, which such board refused to consider or to allow in whole or in part. … The relator asks that a writ of peremptory mandamus may isstie to such board requiring it to consider and audit the bill.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Common Council

    43 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 645 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1885

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brighton Pier v. Board of Assessors

    58 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 644 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1889

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Penfield v. Board of State Assessors

    32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 310 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Nugent v. Board of Police Commissioners

    50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1887

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.