Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

1.44s

  • Mulgrew v. Board of Education of the City School District

    33 Misc. 3d 350 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 2011

    (See Matter of Duke & Benedict v Board of Educ. of Carmel Cent. … A related suit, Steglich v Board of Educ. (index No. 107173/2011 [Steglich 2]) is currently pending before this court.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lancaster County Tavern Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    14 Pa. D. & C.3d 381 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Jan 23, 1980

    Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. … Other classes of individuals have unsuccessfully attempted to extend the Gismondi ruling in order that they might gain standing to protest the board’s decision: White Oak Borough v. Kusic, 7 Pa.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Locks v. Virginia Motor Vehicle Dealer Board

    43 Va. Cir. 511 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Nov 4, 1997

    Falls v. Virginia State Bar, 240 Va. 416, 418 (1990), citing Gwinn v. Alwood, 235 Va. 616, 621 (1988). … See Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. Kenley, 6 Va. App. 231 (1988). The question under this standard is whether a reasonable mind considering die record could reach the decision the agency did.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Virginia Board of Historic Resources

    39 Va. Cir. 282 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · May 29, 1996

    Virginia Real Estate Commission v. Bias, 226 Va. 264, 269 (1983). The Board’s decision is presumed to be correct, and the burden is upon the Rogers to overcome the presumption. Environmental Defense Fund v. … This Court cannot substitute its judgment for the judgment of the Board. Johnston-Willis, Ltd. v. Kenley, 6 Va. App. 231, 263 (1988).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Public Instruction v. First Florida Utilities, Inc.

    28 Fla. Supp. 175 · Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Palm Beach County · Jan 13, 1967

    See Savage v. Winfield, 11 So.2d 302 ; Pascul v. George Davis & Co., 170 So.2d 466 . … Co. v. Tampa Southern R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    30 Ohio Law. Abs. 509 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Dec 26, 1939

    Jeffrey-DeWitt Insulator Co. v National Labor Relations Board, C. C. A. 4, 91 Fed. 2d, 134, 138; Restful Slipper Co. v U. S. Shoe Leather Union, N. J. Ch. 174 A., 543, 545 , 116 N. J. Eq. 521. … Michaelson v U. S. 291 Fed. 940 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Estey Corp. v. Board of Governors of State Colleges & Universities

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 89 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Aug 29, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Haggerty v. State of Illinois, Board of Vocational Education & Rehabilitation

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 27 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jul 25, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • D. Koerner, Inc. v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

    29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 406 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 15, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Freezeland Orchard Co. v. Warren County Board of Supervisors

    61 Va. Cir. 548 · Virginia Circuit Court · Jan 15, 2001

    City Council of Virginia Beach v. Harrell, 236 Va. 99, 102 , 372 S.E.2d 139 (1988). See also Board of Supervisors v. … In County Board of Arlington v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Joe L. Smith, Jr., Inc. v. Board of Regents

    9 Ct. Cl. 245 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1973

    Smith, Jr., Inc., dba Biggs-Johnston-Withrow, a printing firm in Beckley, has filed this claim covering four printing jobs, completed and delivered to the respondent, Board of Regents, and not paid for, in the total amount

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hibbard, O'Connor & Weeks v. West Virginia Board of Education

    8 Ct. Cl. 109 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1970

    On February 11, the Board of Education was advised that the claimant had contacted the officers of ithie Board relative to acting as agents for the Board in the matter of the sale of the bonds ■and the Board was then advised … Eason approved as legal all the acts of the Board in making the bond sale and contracting for the commission to be paid to the claimant.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bryan v. Town Board of the Town of Brighton

    133 Misc. 315 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1928

    Hayes v. Waldo, 212 N. Y. 156, 162 ; People ex rel. Hunt v. Hall, supra; People ex rel. Winspear v. Kreinheder, 197 App. Div. 887 .) … This statute authorizes a majority of the members of the town board to hear and determine the charges preferred against the petitioner. (People ex rel. Pond v. Board of Trustees, 4 App. Div. 399 .)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Caldwell Electric Co. v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 438 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 24, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Hellrung Construction Co. v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

    29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 366 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 17, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Hershenson v. State of Illinois, Board of Vocational Education & Rehabilitation

    27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 178 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 27, 1971

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Pentecostal Orphanage v. State Board of State Aid & Charities

    4 Balt. C. Rep. 743 · Baltimore City Court · Jul 12, 1928

    All such action of the Board is subject to the same right of appeal by any party who shall feel aggrieved at any action of the Board hereunder, as in the case of State aided institutions,” etc. … For these reasons the action of the Board is not only unreasonable and arbitrary, but the action of the Board is also illegal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Webster County Board of Education v. Department of Education

    19 Ct. Cl. 139 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 1, 1992

    Thus, the Webster County Board of Education did not receive the sum of $1,376,729.00, which the parties have agreed in equity and good conscience should be paid to the Webster County Board of Education. … The Budget Digest for Fiscal Year 1993 provides an explanation for this particular line item on page 140 as follows: LOCAL SCHOOL BOARDS It is the intent of Legislature that from the Local School Boards’ Technical Corrections

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Turner Construction Co. v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 489 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 11, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Vallarta Reporting Service v. State of Illinois, Pollution Control Board

    29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 396 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 13, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.