Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.60s
Willard v. Board of Public Works
74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 190 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1893
Hence, the-first question to be determined upon this appeal is whether such-power is vested in the Board of Public Works. … Co. v. Betts, 55 id., 600 ; Matter of D. and H. C. Co., 69 id., 211; Matter of P. P. and C. I. R. R. Co., 85 id., 489.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedLoblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of Pharmacy
22 Misc. 2d 131 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1960
App. 585 ); Kentucky Bd. of Pharmacy v. Cassidy ( 115 Ky. 690, 705-707 ); State ex rel. Board of Pharmacy v. McEwen ( 96 N. W. 2d 189 [Iowa]); State v. Geest ( 118 Neb. 562 ); State v. Collins (61 N. … In the case of Proprietary Assn. v. Board of Pharmacy of New Jersey (16 N.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Churchyard v. Board of Councilmen of Buffalo
20 N.Y.S. 51 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Aug 3, 1892
Corp., (4th Ed.) §§ 208-331; Martindale v. Palmer, 52 Ind. 413 ; National Bank v. Town of Grenada, 41 Fed. Rep. 91; MacKenzie v. Wooley, 39 La. Ann. 949 , 3 South. Rep. 128 . … It seems quite clear that the scheme contemplated by this charter was that original action should be taken by the board of aldermen, and then be passed upon by the board of councilmen, which action was to be subject to review
Cited 10 timesPublishedBrown v. Brookdale Univ. Med. Ctr.
2024 NY Slip Op 50459(U) · New York Supreme Court, Kings County · Apr 23, 2024
Brown v Brookdale Univ. Med. Ctr. ( 2024 NY Slip Op 50459(U) ) [*1] Brown v Brookdale Univ. Med. Ctr. 2024 NY Slip Op 50459(U) Decided on April 23, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Mallafre Melendez, J. … Diamond"), a licensed New York physician who is board certified in family practice with a certificate of added qualifications in geriatric medicine.
Cited 2 timesUnpublishedNew York State Public Employment Relations Board v. Martin
78 Misc. 2d 1072 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1974
In support of his position, such counsel cites Matter of New York State Labor Relations Bd. v. Roosevelt Chevrolet Co. ( 177 Misc. 468 ) wherein the court (p. 475) quoted with approval from Heinz Co. v. … (Matter of De Filippis v. Falkenberg, 170 App. Div. 153, 157 , affd. 219 N. Y. 581 .)
Cited 3 timesPublishedBennett v. Nelson County Board of Supervisors
74 Va. Cir. 528 · Nelson County Circuit Court · May 25, 2006
Under Virginia case law legislative action of a board is reasonable in these circumstances if it is “fairly debatable.” Board of Supervisors v. Lerner, 221 Va. 30, 34-35 , 267 S.E.2d 100, 102 (1980). … See Wiley v. Hanover County, 209 Va. 153, 155-56 , 163 S.E.2d 160 (1968).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Overton v. Board of Trustees of Whitestone
24 N.Y.S. 532 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1893
People v. Daley, 37 Hun, 461 , and cases there cited. … Hutson v. Mayor, etc., 9 N. Y. 163 , following Mayor, etc., v. Furzé, 3 Hill, 612 ; People v. Connolly, 4 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 376; People v. Board of Supervisors, 51 N. Y. 401 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Union & Advertiser Co. v. Board of Supervisors
14 N.Y.S. 867 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1891
Co. v. Mayor, etc., 6 N. Y. Supp. 10 , arose under Laws N. … Citing Weed v. Tucker, 19 N. Y. 432 ; People v. Woodruff, 33 N. Y. 369 ; Cox v. Mayor, etc., 103 N. Y. 533 , 9 N. E. Rep. 48; Bergen v. Powell, 94 N. Y. 591 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. First National Bank v. Board of Supervisors
56 Barb. 452 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1867
And I have no doubt that the legislature had the right to pass a law to compel the board of supervisors to perform that duty. … there had been, then it was mandatory upon the board to repay the amount so erroneously assessed, to the proper party entitled thereto.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCherry v. New York State Board
99 Misc. 2d 1064 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1979
(Matter of Briguglio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 24 NY2d 21 ; Matter of Paulsen v New York State Bd. of Parole, 46 AD2d 661 ; Executive Law, § 259-i, subd 5.) … (Matter of Ittig v New York State Bd. of Parole, 59 AD2d 972 ; Matter of Gonzague v New York State Bd. of Parole, 58 AD2d 707 ; Matter of Consilvio v New York State Bd. of Parole, 57 AD2d 955 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedTri-County Asphalt & Stone Co. v. Board of Assessors
17 Misc. 2d 437 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1958
Syracuse Improvement Co. v. Morgan, 59 App. Div. 302 .) … General Chemical Co. v. Cantor, 105 Misc. 62 , affd. 188 App. Div. 959 ; People ex rel. Ruppert Realty Corp. v. Cantor, 115 Misc. 519 , affd. 204 App. Div. 863 ; Matter of Leonhard Michel Brewing Co. v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNies v. Buffalo Board of EducaTion
89 Misc. 2d 1026 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1976
The Court of Appeals in the Matter of Roher v Dinkins ( 32 NY2d 180 ) determined that school board members were elective officers and therefore school board members were not excluded from the application of sections 3 and … In Matter of Lichtman v Board of Elections of Nassau County ( 27 NY2d 62, 66 ) the rationale of the Bramley case was reiterated stressing the public policy of finality in elections when Judge Jasen quoted from that case as
Cited 0 timesPublishedConsolidated Edison Co. v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
120 Misc. 2d 617 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1983
Y., 54 NY2d 533 ; Matter of 860 Executive Towers v Board of Assessors, 79 Misc 2d 821 , affd 47 AD2d 603 ; Pellaton Apts. v Board of Assessors, 42 AD2d 847 ; Guth Realty v Gingold, 34 NY2d 440 .) … (See Guth Realty v Gingold, 34 NY2d 440 , supra; Matter of 860 Executive Towers v Board of Assessors, 79 Misc 2d 821 , affd 47 AD2d 603 ; Pellaton Apts, v Board of Assessors, 42 AD2d 847 , supra.)
Cited 1 timesPublishedShedrick v. Board of Health of the Consolidated District
204 Misc. 545 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1953
Copcutt v. Board of Health, 140 N. Y. 1 ; Village of White Plains v. Tarrytown, White Plains & Mamaroneck Ry. Co., 117 App. Div. 841 ; People ex rel. Greenleaf v. Board of Health, 83 App. Div. 571 ; Kent v. … Copcutt v.
Cited 3 timesPublished204 Misc. 201 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1953
(Matter of Brown v. Board of Trustees of Town of Hamptonburg School Dist., 303 N. Y. 484, 490 .) Under no circumstances may the court grant leave to file a notice of claim after one year has elapsed. … (Matter of Martin v. School Bd. of Union Free Dist. No. 28, Long Beach, 301 N. Y. 233 ; Matter of Moore v. City of New York, 302 N. Y. 563 ; Chavers v. City of Mount Vernon, 301 N. Y. 634 ; Matter of Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Lowell v. Board of Town Auditors
53 Barb. 555 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1868
for by the board of supervisors of the county. … A mandamus was the proper remedy for the relator, upon the refusal of the board of auditors to perform that duty. (People v. Board of Supervisors of N. Y., 32 N. Y. Rep. 473 . People v. Taylor, 30 How. 78 , 86.)
Cited 4 timesPublishedCentral Laborers' Pension Fund v. Blankfein
34 Misc. 3d 456 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 21, 2011
(White v Panic, 783 A2d 543, 550 [Del 2001].) … Retirement Fund et al., v Lloyd C. Blankfein et al., index No. 650740/2009 (the Security Police action). . Ken Brown v Lloyd C. Blankfein et al., index No. 650003/2010 (the Brown action). .
Cited 2 timesPublishedLofaro v. Board of Standards & Appeals
41 Misc. 2d 272 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1963
(Matter of Reed v. Board of Stds. & Appeals, 255 N. Y. 126, 136 .) … Y. 330, 334-335 ; Matter of Lemir Realty Corp. v. Larkin, 10 A D 2d 1005, affd. 11 N Y 2d 20).
Cited 0 timesPublishedO'Donnell v. Town Board of Amherst
171 Misc. 2d 968 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1997
primary purpose of SEQRA is ' "to inject environmental considerations directly into governmental decision making” ’ (Akpan v Koch, 75 NY2d 561, 569 , quoting Matter of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v Board of Estimate, 72 NY2d … Fork v Wines [ 190 AD2d 794 ]; Matter of Holmes v Brookhaven Town Planning Bd. [ 137 AD2d 601 ]; Chinese Staff & Workers Assn. v City of New York, 68 NY2d 359, 364-365 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedA. Dicillo & Sons, Inc. v. Chester Zoning Board of Appeals
59 Ohio Law. Abs. 513 · Geauga County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 13, 1950
Nevertheless the Supreme Court, in the recent case of Farrand v. State Medical Board of the State of Ohio, 151 Oh St 222, 39 O. O. 41, has ruled that such appeal does not justify a trial de novo. … Water Service Corp. v. Water P. and C. Comm., 283 N. Y., 23 , and Matter of Guernsey Breeders Co-op v. Boyes 284 N. Y. 197 at 204 . Boards of zoning appeals are similarly obligated. In Matter of Collins v. Behan, 285 N.
Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna