Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.48s

  • Brown v. Superior Insulation LLC

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 28, 2023

    CV-23-019 BENJAMIN BROWN, Plaintiff ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS V. SUPERIOR INSULATION LLC, THOMAS A. … Box 179 South Paris, ME 04281-0179 Re: Benjamin Brown v. Superior Insulation, LLC; Thomas A. Dube Construction- Plus, Inc.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Brown v. Superior Insulation LLC

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 21, 2023

    Box 179 south Paris, ME 04281-0179 Re: Benjamin Brown v. Superior Insulation, LLC; Thomas A. Dube Construction- Plus, Inc. … CV-2023-00019 Benjamin Brown v. Superior Insulation, LLC, Thomas A.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Lawrie v. Concord Township Zoning Hearing Board

    17 Pa. D. & C.3d 171 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jan 7, 1981

    In the case of Gross v. … In the case of Novello v. Zoning Board, 384 Pa. 294 , 121 A. 2d 91 (1956), and Parisi v. Phila.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • C. H. O. B. Associates, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    45 Misc. 2d 184 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1964

    B. v. Board of Assessors, N. Y. L. J., *189 April 21, 1964, p. 18, col. 4) is dispositive of this challenge. … In Matter of Cross-Properties v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau (N. Y. L.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Waterville Manufacturing Co. v. Bryan

    14 Barb. 182 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1851

    (Bank of Utica v. Smalley, 2 Cowen, 770. The Bank of Michigan v. Williams, 5 Wend. 478 . S. C. in error, 7 Id. 540 . The Welland Canal Co. v. Hathaway, 8 Id. 480 .) … In Jenner v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schwab v. Pottstown Zoning Board of Adjustment

    35 Pa. D. & C.2d 399 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Jun 24, 1964

    The board did not approve the proper and commendable offer of the solicitor for the board when he suggested that he would go to his office and obtain a Bible. … There appears to be no Supreme Court decision directly on this question although there is dicta in the case of Pumo v. Norristown Borough, 404 Pa. 475 (1961), referring to the administering of the oath at hearings.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mann v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

    75 Va. Cir. 24 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Feb 12, 2008

    Virginia Beach Beautification Com. v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 231 Va. 415, 419 (1986). … Carolinas Cement Co. v. Zoning Appeals Bd., 52 Va. Cir. 6 (2000).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cummer v. Narberth Borough Board of Adjustment

    59 Pa. D. & C. 686 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Jun 16, 1947

    of law: Perelman et al. v. … Superior Ct. 543 , and Fleming v. Prospect Park Board of Adjustment, 318 Pa. 582 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Agosh v. Town of Cicero Board of Assessment Review

    150 Misc. 2d 756 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1991

    Matter of Pierre Pellaton Apts. v Board of Assessors, 43 NY2d 769 ; Matter of Standard Brands v Walsh, 92 Misc 2d 903 ; see also, Matter of Town of Mount Kisco v State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment, 64 NY2d 950 ). … Foundry Div. v Assessor of Town of Massena ( 146 AD2d 851, 853 ): "when the taxpayer’s proof is inadequate, the presumption remains in effect (Matter of Adirondack Mountain Reserve v Board of Assessors, [ 99 AD2d 600 ] supra

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    166 Misc. 2d 112 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1995

    (Bond v Cooke, 237 App Div 229, 232 .) … (Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 NY2d 441, 445; Matter of Bockis v Kayser, 112 AD2d 222 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Theresa Friedman & Sons, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    20 Pa. D. & C.2d 149 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 3, 1959

    The zoning board of adjustment denied the application and this appeal followed. … It appears from a statement of the board chairman, contained in the notes of testimony, that on February 17, 1955, the board approved the erection of an addition, an extension to the then existing preserve processing plant

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • 35 North Long Beach Co. v. Board of Assessors

    84 Misc. 2d 66 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1975

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Green Acres Building Corp v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    22 Misc. 2d 877 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1959

    (Matter of Bayer v. Pugsley, 13 Misc 2d 610, 613 , affd. 7 A D 2d 828.) The zoning board refused to issue the permit by virtue of subdivision 2 of section 280-a aforesaid hereinbefore quoted in pertinent part. … (Matter of Brous v. Smith, 304 N. Y. 164 ; Matter of Bayer v. Pugsley, 13 Misc 2d 610 , affd. 7 A D 2d 828, supra.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Nelson County Board of Supervisors

    75 Va. Cir. 474 · Nelson County Circuit Court · Aug 16, 2007

    Richardson v. City of Suffolk, 252 Va. 336, 338, 477 S.E.2d 512 (1996). … Wilhelm v. Morgan, 208 Va. 398, 403 , 157 S.E.2d 920 (1967).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cross v. Princeton City School District Board of Education

    49 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jul 21, 1989

    Brannon v. Bd. of Edn. (1919), 99 Ohio St. 369 , 124 N.E. 235 , paragraphs two and three of the syllabus; Greco v. … Greco v. Roper, supra; Laucher v. Simpson (1971), 28 Ohio App. 2d 195, 199 , 57 O.O. 2d 303, 306, 276 N.E. 2d 261, 264 . Such is the case here.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Coal Co. v. Board of Public Affairs

    2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 428 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jun 15, 1889

    The two lowest propositions to deliver to Front street, were Brown 2d Pool at $2.27 and Winifrede at $2.28 per ton; 179 per cent, in favor of Brown over Winifrede, and deducting this excess for that of its valuation to it … , 3.199 — 179, 2.409 per cent, in favor of Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hilton Inns, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of Tarrytown

    39 Misc. 2d 792 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1963

    Co. v. Commissioners, 55 App. Div. 218 ; People ex rel. Brown v. O’Rourke, 31 id. 563).” The case of People ex rel. Irving Sav. Bank v. Howes ( 266 App. Div. 1024 ) is controlling here. … (Matter of Hunt Foods v. Basinait, 4 A D 2d 1002; Matter of Limerick v. Fitzgerald, 29 Misc 2d 185; Matter of Town & Country Plaza v. Board of Assessors, 10 Misc 2d 942 .) In Matter of Resin Realty Corp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fresh Meadows Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    92 Misc. 2d 519 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1977

    The board’s first attempt to comply with such criteria in determining fair market rents was rejected by the courts. In Matter of Bradcord Assoc. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. … Corp. v Temporary State Housing Rent Comm., 3 Misc 2d 356 , affd 2 AD2d 678 , affd 2 NY2d 799 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Winifrede Coal Co. v. Board of Public Affairs

    4 Ohio C.C. 76 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 15, 1889

    The two lowest propositions to deliver to Front Street, were •Brown 2d Pool at $2.27 and Winifrede at $2.28 per ton ; 179 per cent, in favor of Brown over Winifrede, and deducting this ex *80 cess for that of its valuation … to it, 3.199 -179, 2.409 per cent, in favor of Brown.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Nelson County Board of Supervisors

    73 Va. Cir. 109 · Nelson County Circuit Court · Mar 20, 2007

    In the context of a predecessor *110 statute to § 15.2-1243 et seq., the Supreme Court of Virginia has defined a claim as “a call upon a board to pay an amount alleged to be due.” Stamie Lyttle Co. v. … For instance, a county may be sued on contractual obligation, Mann v. Arlington County Bd., 199 Va. 169 , 98 S.E.2d 515 (1957); a county may be sued on an inverse condemnation action, Nelson County v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.