Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.45s
Point Lookout Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals
112 Misc. 2d 263 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1981
Kern, supra; Matter of Brower v Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. … Post -Fulling v Palumbo cases where a board’s grant of an area variance by a zoning board was the issue appear not to have required a showing of economic injury.
Cited 3 timesPublishedInglis v. Dundee Central School District Board of Education
180 Misc. 2d 156 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1999
(Mathis v State of New York, 140 Misc 2d 333, 339 .) Thus the facts must be so clear-cut that reasonable minds could reach no other conclusion. (Supra, citing Servidone Constr. Corp. v Security Ins. … (Blood v Board of Educ., 121 AD2d 128 .)
Cited 7 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Thornton v. Board of Public Parks
17 N.Y.S. 589 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Feb 1, 1892
We are referred to the case of People v. Gallup, 1 Lawrence, J., (Sup. … Moore v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJames v. Westchester County Board of Elections
53 Misc. 3d 423 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 1, 2016
[2d Dept 2015], citing Matter of Dunlea v New York State Bd. of Elections, 275 AD2d 589 [3d Dept 2000]). … Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 207 AD2d 513 [2d Dept 1994]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrookhaven Borough v. Brookhaven Zoning Hearing Board
17 Pa. D. & C.3d 312 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Apr 16, 1980
In DePaul Realty Company v. Borough of *315 Quakertown, 15 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 16, 22 , 324 A. 2d 832, 835 (1974), the court noted: “. . . … McGovern, Jr. in Borough of Brookhaven v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Brookhaven and Luz, 67 Del.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Board of Health v. Supervisors of Dutchess
9 Wend. 508 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1833
The revised statutes authorize the board of supervisors of each county to examine, settle, and allow all accounts chargeable against such county. 1 R. S. 367, § 4, sub, 2. … They have no right to alter the compensation fixed by the board of health for the health officer; that the legislature have committed entirely to the discretion of the board of health, and that the supervisors must collect
Cited 17 timesPublishedNewby v. Newtown Township Board of Supervisors
53 Pa. D. & C.2d 627 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Mar 30, 1971
deFURIA, J., This action is an appeal by plaintiff, lodged on October 14, 1970, from the order of the Board of Supervisors of the Township of Newtown, Pa., affirming plaintiff’s honorable discharge as a township police officer … Appeal under the Act of 1951 is provided in section 5 thereof: “The suspended or dismissed employe shall have the right to appeal to the court of common pleas of the county in which he was employed.”: McCandless Twp. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSala v. Fairview Township Zoning Hearing Board
27 Pa. D. & C.4th 385 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Sep 13, 1994
Marchese v. Norristown Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2 Pa. Commw. 84, 277 A.2d 176 (1971); West Mifflin v. Zoning Hearing Board, 3 Pa. Commw. 485 , 284 A.2d 320 (1971). … See Smith v. Board of Zoning Appeal of City of Scranton, 74 Pa. Commw. 405 , 459 A.2d 1350 (1983).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDavis v. Radnor Township Board of Adjustment
43 Pa. D. & C.2d 341 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jul 21, 1967
not the zoning board abused its discretion or committed an error of law: Cresko Zoning Case, 400 Pa. 467 ; Rogalski v. … See also Sheedy v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 409 Pa. 655 , which involved the grant of a variance to prevent mandatory reconversion of a five-unit, multifamily dwelling back into a single-family dwelling.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKokomo Straw Board Co. v. Inman
51 N.Y. St. Rep. 12 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1893
The case of Hatch v. Bank, 78 N. Y., 487 , shows that under § 723 of the Code the court had ample power to grant the relief contained in the order appealed from.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLevering v. Board of Supervisors of Elections
4 Balt. C. Rep. 64 · Baltimore City Superior Court · Jul 7, 1920
To this end the Board of Supervisors of Elections of Baltimore City was directed to have printed on the ballots the following-proposition : “Shall the present laws be amended so as to permit motion pictures on Sunday?” … The petitioners, in this case, are members of the Lord’s Day Alliance, and as representatives of that body, and as individuals and taxpayers, they seek a writ of mandamus directed to the Board of Supervisors, restraining
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoro-wide School Transportation Corp. v. Board of Education
162 Misc. 1 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1937
This action is brought for damages against the board of education. *2 What was the remedy of the plaintiff áfter the award to its rival? … Lynch v. Mayor ( 2 App. Div. 213 ) and Beckwith v. City of New York (121 id. 462) are authority for this proposition. But here the city had not yet accepted the bid, although to be sure, it was ready to accept.
Cited 1 timesPublished23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 121 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878
Brown died holding certain notes made by defendant. These notes were in fact signed by Alfred Gilman in defendant’s name, and as defendant’s agent. … (Stark-wheather v. Matthews, 2 Hill, 131 .) He was not a party to the record. He was not called on behalf of the plaintiffs, who had succeeded to the title to the note from and through him.
Cited 0 timesPublishedLang v. Board of Supervisors of Elections
3 Balt. C. Rep. 49 · Baltimore City Court · Oct 22, 1909
That board refused to place upon the official ballot the name of the petitioner, and this proceeding is taken to compel the placing of the name of Mrs. Ada Smith Lang upon the official ballot. … The Board of Supervisors of Election is a board of purely statutory creations, and as such it can exercise no power not given to it by statute, nor can it exercise any power where the jurisdiction over the subject has been
Cited 0 timesPublishedRohr v. Fauquier County Board of Supervisors
75 Va. Cir. 167 · Fauquier County Circuit Court · Apr 24, 2008
In Glazebrook v. … Board of Supervisors v. Lerner, 221 Va. 30, 37 , 267 S.E.2d 100 (1980); see also Concerned Taxpayers of Brunswick County v. County of Brunswick, 249 Va. 320 , 455 S.E.2d 712 (1995).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKramer v. Board of Police Department
21 Jones & S. 492 · The Superior Court of New York City · Jul 2, 1886
—By section 250 of chapter 410 of the Laws of 1882, known as the Consolidation Act, it is provided that the government and discipline of the police department of the city of Hew York shall be such as the *495 board of police … The question was presented to the court of appeals in the case of Davis v. The American Society, &c. ( 75 N.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAmoco Oil Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board
26 Pa. D. & C.3d 231 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Sep 16, 1982
The zoning hearing board argues that there must be a change in conditions in order to obtain the relief required, citing Esterhai v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 1 Pa. Commw. 361 , 274 A. 2d 556 (1971). … Naimoli v. Zoning Hearing Board, 56 Pa. Commw. 337 , 425 A. 2d 36 (1981). At the hearing, appellant presented testimony by a sole witness in support of the modification.
Cited 0 timesPublishedKelley v. Delaware County Board of Elections
19 Pa. D. & C.3d 492 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jul 7, 1981
The court could dismiss the petition and allow the results, as certified by the board of elections, to stand. … Said election shall be held within 30 days of the date of this order, as set by the board of elections. 2. Said election shall be held between William G. Savage and A1 Kelley. 3.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAndorra Nurseries, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors
24 Pa. D. & C.3d 260 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Oct 8, 1980
applicant shall be entitled to final plan approval in accordance with the terms of the approved preliminary application: Ridge view Associates v. … The regulations relied upon by the township staff and the board are valid.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Overton v. Board of Trustees of Whitestone
24 N.Y.S. 532 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1893
People v. Daley, 37 Hun, 461 , and cases there cited. … Hutson v. Mayor, etc., 9 N. Y. 163 , following Mayor, etc., v. Furzé, 3 Hill, 612 ; People v. Connolly, 4 Abb. Pr. (N. S.) 376; People v. Board of Supervisors, 51 N. Y. 401 .
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna