Case law

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Everly

62 Pa. D. & C. 667 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Feb 11, 1948

These cases were cited as authority in the late Pennsylvania case of Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Kaufman Dept. Stores, Inc., 345 Pa. 398 . … As to the alleged discrimination against Sanders, the principle expressed in Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Kaufman, supra, is applicable.

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Steckline

89 Pa. D. & C. 49 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Aug 2, 1954

In the leading case of Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. … Justice Chidsey’s opinion in the very recent case of Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Dobison v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

87 Pa. D. & C. 172 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 5, 1953

See Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U. S. 365 . … See Alden Park Corporation v. Zoning Board, 84 D. & C. 40.

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Levin

50 Pa. D. & C. 79 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 3, 1944

upon a petition by the board for enforcement of its order. … B. v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U. S. 240, 261-262 ; Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. N. L. R. B., 104 F. (2d) 49, 56 (C. C. A. 8th, 1939). See also cases collected in note, 144 A. L. R. 445, 446.

Andrews v. Warren County Board of Supervisors

37 Va. Cir. 128 · Warren County Circuit Court · May 30, 1995

Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 225 Va. 157, 161 , 300 S.E.2d 603 (1983). Accordingly, Mr. Spory may lawfully sit on the school board. … Even if there were a defect in the appointment of any member, the member’s vote and the Board’s official action would still be valid under the de facto officer doctrine. Owen v.

McMeekin v. Pennsylvania Board of Parole

60 Pa. D. & C. 44 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Mar 10, 1947

J., On or about January 16, 1947, we received, by mail, a petition for a writ of alternative mandamus in this case, and have held it under consideration to determine whether, pursuant to the cases of Raffel v. … Pittsburgh et al., 340 Pa. 243 , Gretton v. Pittsburgh et al., 344 Pa. 219 ; McCrory v. Philadelphia et al., 345 Pa. 154 ; Crede v.

Triolo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

59 Pa. D. & C. 211 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 18, 1946

Our construction is in accord with that of our colleagues in the Court of Common Pleas No. 1 of Philadelphia County, wherein the same question was presented in Giunta et al. v. McLaughlin et al., 30 D. & C. 644 (1937). … the order of the board.

Allen v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

56 Pa. D. & C. 402 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Feb 8, 1946

The court held that the grant of the certificate for a period of one year lay within the discretion of the board and the order was affirmed. An appeal was then taken to the Superior Court in the case of Gish et al. v. … In Gish et al. v.

Goodman v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

39 Pa. D. & C. 636 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jul 15, 1940

In Fredericks v. Board of Health, etc., 82 N. J. … In Anderson v. Board of Education, etc., et al., 126 Cal.

Pine Grove Township v. Zoning Hearing Board

36 Pa. D. & C.3d 316 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County · Jul 22, 1985

Zoning Hearing Board v. Konyk, 5 Pa. Commw. 466 , 290 A.2d 715 (1972). … In reaching its conclusion of January 24, 1985, the board stated: *320 “In light of the above (findings of fact), the Warren County Zoning Hearing Board does hereby approve the application of Ronald and Olga Snyder dated

Where's Prime Rib, LLP v. Zoning Hearing Board

45 Pa. D. & C.5th 86 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Dec 8, 2014

DiNardo v. City of Pittsburgh, 15 Pa. Cmwlth. 279, 284, 325 A.2d 654, 657 (1974). … Kuhl v. Zoning Hearing Board of Greene Township, 52 Pa. Cmwlth. 249, 415 A.2d 954 (1980).

Dale's Esso, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board

61 Pa. D. & C.2d 62 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Jan 4, 1973

After hearing, that board affirmed. This appeal followed. … Zoning Board of Adjustment, 408 Pa. 260 (1962); Lord Appeal, 368 Pa. 121 (1951).

Griffin v. Brunswick County Public School Board

77 Va. Cir. 275 · Brunswick County Circuit Court · Nov 14, 2008

Co. v. Rice, 239 Va. 646 , 391 S.E.2d 71 (1990). In Rice , two men, Danny Rice and Roy Vest, left to go hunting in a Jeep driven by Vest. … Co. v. Sleigh, 267 Va. 768 , 594 S.E.2d 604 (2004); Travelers Ins. Co. v. LaClair, 250 Va. 368, 371-72 , 463 S.E.2d 461, 463 (1995).

Drago v. Norristown Borough Board of Adjustment

53 Pa. D. & C. 380 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Feb 8, 1945

In support of this contention, petitioners cite the case of Hotel Casey Co. v. Ross et al., 343 Pa. 573 (1942). … Co. v. Cuyler et al., 283 Pa. 422, 429 (1925); Ward’s Appeal, 289 Pa. 458, 461 (1927).

Mutter v. Washington County Board of Supervisors

29 Va. Cir. 394 · Washington County Circuit Court · Dec 17, 1992

At the July 13, 1992, meeting of the board, the same supervisor, James P. Litton, again moved the approval of this site. The Board decided to advertise the site once again for another public hearing. … The case of Bollinger v. Roanoke County, 217 Va. 185 (1976), relied upon by the plaintiffs involved a special use permit for a landfill.

People ex rel. Board of Health v. Supervisors of Dutchess

9 Wend. 508 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1833

The revised statutes authorize the board of supervisors of each county to examine, settle, and allow all accounts chargeable against such county. 1 R. S. 367, § 4, sub, 2. … They have no right to alter the compensation fixed by the board of health for the health officer; that the legislature have committed entirely to the discretion of the board of health, and that the supervisors must collect

Bennett v. Nelson County Board of Supervisors

74 Va. Cir. 57 · Nelson County Circuit Court · Mar 26, 2007

Whether a board is considering zoning action or a use permit, the standard of review is reasonableness. City *58 Council of Virginia Beach v. … Harrell, 236 Va. 99, 102 , 372 S.E.2d 139 (1988); County Board of Arlington v. Bratic, 237 Va. 221, 226-27 , 377 S.E.2d 368 (1989).

Arlington Village Development Corp. v. Board of Standards & Appeals

204 Misc. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1953

In Matter of Reed v. Board of Standards & Appeals ( 255 N. … Sheldon v. Board of Appeals, 234 N. Y. 484 ; People ex rel. Beinert v. Miller, 188 App. Div. 113 ). See, also, Matter of Aloe v. Dassler ( 278 App.

Amoco Oil Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board

26 Pa. D. & C.3d 231 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Sep 16, 1982

The zoning hearing board argues that there must be a change in conditions in order to obtain the relief required, citing Esterhai v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 1 Pa. Commw. 361 , 274 A. 2d 556 (1971). … Naimoli v. Zoning Hearing Board, 56 Pa. Commw. 337 , 425 A. 2d 36 (1981). At the hearing, appellant presented testimony by a sole witness in support of the modification.

Pschesang v. Milford Board of Zoning Appeals

163 Ohio Misc. 2d 41 · Clermont County Court of Common Pleas · Apr 22, 2011

It also has in its possession the exhibits and documents considered by the board of zoning appeals. … R.C. 2506.03(B); Culkar v. Brooklyn Hts., Cuyahoga App. No. 94968, 2011-Ohio-724 , 2011 WL 578637 , ¶ 27; Rowe v. Carlisle Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, Lorain App. No. 10CA009852, 2011-Ohio-395 , 2011 WL 332670 , ¶ 7.