Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • Tax Review Board v. Reynolds & Co.

    68 Pa. D. & C.2d 233 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Sep 19, 1974

    The second issue is whether the decision in Philadelphia Tax Review Board v. … Justice Roberts stated in Philadelphia Tax Review Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mager v. Bedminster Township Zoning Board

    39 Pa. D. & C.2d 368 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Feb 14, 1966

    Pursuant to the remand order, the zoning board of adjustment held a further hearing, at which it was stipulated by counsel that appellant’s property constitutes a “farm”, and not a subdivision; whereupon, the zoning board … See also Cleaver v. Board of Adjustment, 414 Pa. 367 (1964), and the cases there cited at page 374.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • German Exchange Bank v. Board of Commissioners of Excise

    57 How. Pr. 187 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1879

    In the case under consideration, the defendants, Morton and Patterson, were commissioners of excise, the former being president of the board, and the latter its treasurer. … The tickets accompanying the deposits disclose that the moneys were deposited by the board of excise.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Lombardo v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    56 Pa. D. & C.2d 307 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 26, 1970

    It is not necessary or useful at this time to indicate the scope of this evidence, since our decision is not based on abuse of discretion on the part of the board in making its determination of facts (Polizzi v. … Furthermore, in Jacobi v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goldsand v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    28 Pa. D. & C.2d 223 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 17, 1962

    allowable where facts and conditions detailed in the ordinance as those upon which an exception is permitted exist: Appeal of Catholic Cemeteries Association of the Diocese of Pittsburgh, 379 Pa. 516 , 109 A. 2d 537 ; Lukens v. … In Gibson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 13 D. & C. 2d 203, 44 Del.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tenox Corp. v. Tax Review Board

    24 Pa. D. & C.2d 426 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 20, 1961

    Brown, Jr., P. J., This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Review Board of the City of Philadelphia. … Reliance is placed by appellant on Girard Trust Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Blythe Township v. Board of Elections

    14 Pa. D. & C.4th 432 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County · Oct 24, 1991

    DISCUSSION In Hempfield School District v. Election Board of Lancaster County, 133 Pa. … Therefore, the Election Board of Lancaster County was enjoined from including the non-binding referendum on the election ballot.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGlinchey v. State Tax Equalization Board

    23 Pa. D. & C.2d 594 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Aug 22, 1960

    See also Falgiatore v. Falgiatore, 378 Pa. 586 (1954), and Fountain v. Bigham, 235 Pa. 35 (1912). … In the case of McSorley v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Penz v. Stowe Township School Board

    39 Pa. D. & C.2d 562 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Dec 31, 1965

    See Jermyn v. City of Scranton, 186 Pa. 595 . In Commonwealth ex rel. v. … Franek v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Seitchik v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    13 Pa. D. & C.2d 43 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jul 10, 1957

    This language alone appears to support appellant’s position; but Darling v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Philadelphia, 357 Pa. 428 , is to the contrary. … The board erred as a matter of law in failing to find unnecessary hardship. Pincus v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 376 Pa. 175 , relied upon by the board is inapposite.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barrie v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    5 Pa. D. & C.4th 174 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Mar 13, 1990

    Section 4-493(1) provides in pertinent part that it shall be unlawful: “For any licensee or the board, or any employee, servant or agent of such licensee or of the board, or any other person, to sell, furnish or give any … See e.g., Fischer v. Anderson, 173 Pa. Super. 175 , 96 A.2d 168 (1953); Commonwealth v. Johnson, 457 Pa. 554 , 327 A.2d 632 (1974).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nester v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

    42 Pa. D. & C. 53 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Feb 19, 1941

    (Powers v. Board of Public Works, supra; Rodgers v. Board of Public Works, supra.) … (Matter of Lazenby v. Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of Elmira, 116 App. Div. 135 ; affd., 188 N. Y. 588 .) ” In the case of Kassarich v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 139 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lloyd v. Lackawanna County Retirement Board

    6 Pa. D. & C.2d 705 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Jan 11, 1956

    Where the language and meaning are clear the intention of the legislature is to be found only in the unambiguous language of the statute: Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. … See Baker v. Retirement Board of Allegheny County, 374 Pa. 165 . And, too, it must be noted that no contributions have been made to the fund on this score.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shore v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

    3 Pa. D. & C.2d 14 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Jan 19, 1955

    The zoning board of adjustment should have recognized the right of petitioner to expand the nonconforming use of her building. … The order of the zoning board is accordingly reversed. No variance under the Housing and Sanitation Act is required for the reasons aforementioned.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jerrehian v. Board of Assessment Appeals

    3 Pa. D. & C.4th 68 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · Sep 7, 1989

    Deigendesch v. County of Bucks, 505 Pa. 555, 562 , 482 A.2d 228, 232 (1984). … Id.; see also, Lehigh Valley Co-op Farmers v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 498 Pa. 521 , 447 A.2d 948 (1982); West Allegheny Hospital v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County, 63 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Juarbe v. Board of Inspectors

    32 Misc. 584 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1900

    In Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U. … The only case requiring special notice is Hepburn v. Ellzey, 2 Cranch, 445 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Sacco

    13 Pa. D. & C.2d 469 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County · Sep 23, 1957

    Co. v. … in National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rauhauser v. Dover Township Zoning Board

    60 Pa. D. & C.2d 644 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County · Aug 14, 1972

    v. … This ordinarily would require a remand to the board but under the authority of Zoning Hearing Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nace v. New Cumberland Zoning Hearing Board

    34 Pa. D. & C.5th 453 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Oct 15, 2013

    Co. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of City of McKeesport, 664 A.2d 688, 693 (Pa. Cmwlth. *459 1995). An abuse of discretion occurs when the Board’s findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence. Id. … Lecky v. Lower Southhampton Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd., 864 A.2d 593 , 595 n.1 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sugerman v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    6 Pa. D. & C.2d 578 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County · Jun 15, 1955

    Small v. Scranton Printers Union, no. 5, 1940, and Lancaster Yellow Cab Inc. v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 371 Pa. 49 . … Now, therefore, June 15, 1955, the appeal from the order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board is dismissed and this action is remanded to said board for further proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.