Case law

Eberly v. Board of School Directors

43 Pa. D. & C.2d 233 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Jul 3, 1967

Upon the board’s denial of this request, plaintiffs asked the board to set up a panel under the Public Employees’ Act to “dispose of the grievance”. The board refused and this action followed. … See Norwalk Teachers’ Assn. v. Board of Education of City of Norwalk, 138 Conn. 269 , 83 A. 2d 482 (1951).

Brown v. 271 Madison Co.

2025 NY Slip Op 31715(U) · New York Supreme Court, New York County · May 12, 2025

Brown, which is reflected in a substantially greater past pain and suffering award. Perez v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc., (Sup. … See, Topczi_j v. Clark, 28 152267/2015 BROWN, MEGHAN vs. 271 MADISON CO.

McGuire v. Board of City Trusts

51 Pa. D. & C. 495 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Schuylkill County · Nov 22, 1943

As stated by Judge Sharswood, in Philadelphia v. … Board of Directors of City Trusts et al., 324 Pa. 545 (554). It is, therefore, evident that this board is a part of the municipal government of the City of Philadelphia.

Etters v. State Employes' Retirement Board

34 Pa. D. & C.2d 757 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Sep 21, 1964

of Medical Education and Licensure v. … See Fried v. Fisher 328 Pa. 497 (1938); Commonwealth v. Taylor’s Exr., *765 297 Pa. 335 (1929); Northwestern National Bank v. Commonwealth, 345 Pa. 192 (1942).

Tax Review Board v. Holmes & Co.

14 Pa. D. & C.2d 371 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 31, 1957

However, in the case of Brown & Zortman Machinery Company v. Pittsburgh, 375 Pa. 250 , a case very similar to this, it was stated, at page 254, that: “Agency is one of the chief characteristics of a broker....” … Cotterel, 196 Pa. 614 ) ; anthracite coal dealers as distinguished from bituminous coal dealers (Heisler v. Thomas Col *375 liery Co., 274 Pa. 448 , and Commonwealth v.

Weir v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

13 Pa. D. & C.2d 225 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County · Oct 7, 1957

In the case of Paxtang Board of Adjustment v. … See Leaver v. Buckingham Township Board of Adjustment, supra.

Fitzpatrick v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

10 Pa. D. & C.2d 489 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Dec 4, 1956

Nor *492 ristown Board of Adjustment, 72 D. & C. 270 (1950). Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County followed the decision in the Hewlett case: Rymarszick v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, C. P. … See also Cummer v. Narberth Borough Board of Adjustment, 59 D. & C. 686, 691 (1947); Babcock v. Laidlaw, 113 N. J. Eq. 318, 166 Atl. 632, 633 (1933); Busse & Borgmann Co. v. Upchurch, 60 Ohio App. 349 , 21 N.

Schneider v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

8 Pa. D. & C.2d 539 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Feb 15, 1957

Schneider v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Whitehall at no. 105-A of 1954, Allegheny County Court, heard by Judge Kaufman, the same reasons were given by the board for refusing a building permit. … The court also held that the borough ordinance could not prohibit the expansion of appellant’s business and cited Humphreys v.

Coyne v. Allegheny County Return Board

25 Pa. D. & C. 55 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Sep 30, 1935

L. 246, it has been repeatedly held, and this seems to be admitted by counsel supporting the return board’s action, that the function of the return board is to count the vote. … It is to be observed that “certificates aforesaid” in the quoted language refers to the certificates of the election board, the board of registration commissioners, and the board of county commissioners, and does not refer

Fleishon v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

2 Pa. D. & C.2d 45 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Oct 27, 1954

It is obvious that the legislature, in creating the zoning board and in giving the board such power, meant the power to be exercised. … Moreover, she argues that the zoning board must determine what constitutes “adequate access”. Again, the board dismissed this argument by simply stating a legal conclusion.

Carbonneau v. Personnel Appeal Board

31 Conn. Supp. 186 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Sep 26, 1974

Bank Building & Equipment Corporation v. Architectural Examining Board, 153 Conn. 121, 125 . The time and method provided .are to secure, in the public interest, a speedy determination of the issues involved; Hubbard v. … Daley v. Board of Police Commissioners, 133 Conn. 716, 719 . Failure to comply with the statutory requirements renders the proceedings voidable and subject to abatement.

De La Rosa v. Board of Examiners

52 Misc. 2d 916 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1967

It is clear that the by-laws of the Board of Education, which have the force and effect of law (Matter of Garber v. Board of Educ. of City of N. … Thus the Board of Examiners could not certify that the applicant passed the examination. Accordingly, the Board of Examiners still retained the power to investigate petitioner’s record. Matter of Mannix v.

Telford v. Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University

24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 416 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 12, 1963

Claimant has brought action against The Board of Trustees of Southern Illinois University to recover for damages allegedly suffered as a result of personal injury sustained on June 12, 1961. … Claimant asserts the novel argument that the notice requirements of Sec. 22-1 of Chap. 37 refer only to actions brought directly against the State of Illinois, and do not refer to actions against respondent, The Board of

People ex rel. Brownell v. Board of Assessors

109 N.Y.S. 991 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1908

Holler v. Board of Contract of Albany, 2 How. Frac. (N. S.) 425; Hudson County v. Bayonne, 54 N. J. Law, 297, 23 Atl. 648 . This objection, therefore, is not tenable. … Holler v. Board of Contract of Albany, 2 How. Prac. (N.

Nester v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

42 Pa. D. & C. 53 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Feb 19, 1941

(Powers v. Board of Public Works, supra; Rodgers v. Board of Public Works, supra.) … (Matter of Lazenby v. Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of Elmira, 116 App. Div. 135 ; affd., 188 N. Y. 588 .) ” In the case of Kassarich v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 139 Pa.

People ex rel. O'Loughlin v. Board of Estimate & Apportionment

87 Misc. 601 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1914

Trustees of the Free Public Library v. Board of Finance of Jersey *609 City, 98 N. J. … Commissioners v.

General Excavation, Inc. v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

33 Va. Cir. 120 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Nov 24, 1993

Any attempt by the Board, or its agents and employees, to dispense with this requirement would violate the Dillon Rule and would be void ab initio. Spotsylvania County School Board v. Sherman Construction, 14 Va. … Schlosser Co., Inc. v. Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County, 245 Va. 451 , 428 S.E.2d 919 (1993).

Khan v. Harrisburg Zoning Hearing Board

17 Pa. D. & C.3d 1 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jan 14, 1981

Appellant relies on the recent case of Quality Food Markets, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of South Lebanon Township, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 569 , 413 A. 2d 1168 (1980). … The statute requires that ‘“the board . . . shall render a written decision’” (emphasis supplied), and the transcript was not a writing rendered by the board.

Anastasi v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

30 Pa. D. & C.3d 525 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Apr 11, 1984

In Scott v. C. E. … See, Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973); Moyer v. Phillips, 462 Pa. 395 , 341 A.2d 441 (1975).

Bruaw v. Mechanicsburg Zoning Hearing Board

29 Pa. D. & C.3d 159 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Aug 8, 1983

Realty, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Sharon Hill, 27 Pa. Commw. 32 , 365 A.2d 670 (1976). … Gustin v. Zoning Board of Sayre Borough, 55 Pa. Commw. 410 , 423 A.2d 1085 (1980).