Case law

State ex rel. Krejsa v. Board of Education

2 Ohio C.C. 510 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Sep 15, 1887

And. it avers that said rules were not regularly suspended by said board, in that they were suspended by a majority only of the members of the board, and not by all the members of the board, nor all the members present. … The Board of Education was composed of twenty members.

State ex rel. Cahoo v. Board of Elections

16 Ohio C.C. 1 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1898

I read from the case of State ex rel. v. Archibald, Sheriff, 52 Ohio St., 1 . … intended to abolish the existing board without providing some other board in its place?

Browne & Stewart v. United States Board & Paper Co.

20 Ohio C.C. 351 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1900

The answer of the defendant was first, a general denial of all allegations hot therein admitted, and, second, allegations to the effect that the contract was made with Browne & Stewart while Browne was acting as a director … We think under the decision of our supreme court in the case of Rolling Stock Co. v.

State ex rel. Twachtman v. State Medical Board

22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 385 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 7, 1910

The objection to the present policy of the board is that no time whatever is fixed for an examination in Cincinnati, and that the practical effect of it is to coerce *386 the students to take the examination at Columbus, … It would be a clear abuse of the discretion vested in the board to indirectly nullify ’the statute and deprive the students of Cincinnati and vicinity of the privilege conferred.

Ohio ex rel. Rogers v. Board of Education

1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 89 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1903

But if we were wrong in this construction of the statute, still the writ should not issue In State v. Shelby Co. (Comrs.), 36 Ohio St., 326 , it is said in the opinion on page 331: Hiram E. Starhey, for plaintiff. E. J. … The new board was met with the same difficulty.

State ex rel. Board of Education v. Raine

4 Ohio C.C. 72 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1889

In the year 1887, by the action of the board of county commissioners, (which action, on proceedings brought to review the same, was affirmed by the court of common pleas and by this court,) under the statutes regulating and … By other sections, special school districts like No. 1, are authorized, and in both, boards of education are provided for.

State ex rel. Twachtman v. State Medical Board

13 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 175 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jun 7, 1910

The objection to the present policy of the board is that no time' whatever .is fixed for an examination in Cincinnati, and that the practical effect of it is to coerce the students to take the examination at Columbus, lest … It would be a clear abuse of the discretion vested in the board to indirectly nullify the statute and deprive the students of Cincinnati and vicinity of the privilege conferred.

City of Detroit v. Board of Public Works

2 Mich. N.P. 186 · Wayne Circuit Court · Jul 15, 1871

It is claimed on the part of the complainant that the Legislature have no right to designate the members of the m-esent Board. *188 The Constitution provides, by article 15, section 14, that “ judicial officers of cities … It is conceded by the defendants that this clause is the one under which the appointments in the case at bar were made, but it is claimed that the Legislature by designating the names of the Board itself virtually declared

State ex rel. Fanning v. Board of Commissioners

6 Ohio N.P. 405 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · Jul 1, 1899

And, considering that, I desire, first, to say, that the court dees nqt intend to reflect at all upon the honesty of the board of county commissioners or the engineer in charge of the werk. … in this case, which have more or less force, but which the court has not taken the time to carefully examine or consider; to-wit, the allegation that there was no certificate from the county auditor or any clerk of the board

Ohio ex rel. Rodgers v. Board of Education

14 Ohio C.C. Dec. 383 · Ashtabula Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1903

In State v. Shelby Co. … The new board was met with the same difficulty.

State ex rel. Ferry v. Board of Education

4 Ohio Cir. Dec. 540 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1894

Merrill & JCuehnert; Horstman, Galvin, Whittaker and O'Connell. _ I That on September 9,1889, the board, by resolution of that date assumed to reduce the compensation of the relator and the other members of the board of Examiners … ■ The claim of counsel for the relator is that the board of education, having, in pursuance of the requirement of the statute, fixed the compensation or salary ■of the members of the board of examiners, that it had no right

Ashland & Western Railway Co. v. Board of Commissioners

14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 344 · Wayne Circuit Court · Oct 18, 1911

People ex rel. Ulrich v. Board of Education

4 N.Y.S. 102 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Nov 27, 1888

board to the board of education. … Margaret McKenna v. Adeline G. Kelly, which involved the same point, Judge Bookstaver came to the same conclusion, and I entirely agree with him upon this point.

Gloucester Iron Works v. Board of Water Commissioners

63 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 647 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1890

People ex rel. White v. Board of Supervisors

71 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1892

People ex rel. Sutliff v. Board of Supervisors

72 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1892

People ex rel. White v. Board of Supervisors

72 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1892

People ex rel. Toohey v. Board of Supervisors

73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 632 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1892

People ex rel. Toohey v. Board of Supervisors

73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 632 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1892

People ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of Education

56 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 608 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1888