Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • People ex rel. McCarthy v. Board of Police

    34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hoffman v. Board of Education

    49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 659 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Youmans v. Board of Supervisors

    9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 102 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

    The record of the proceedings of said board is as follows: Resolved, That we as a board of supervisors decline to change or interfere with William Toumans’ assessment as to rents reserved in the towns of Kortright and Davenport … The board of supervisors erred in refusing to interfere with such assessments on the ground that it had no power or discretion in the matter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Woods v. Board of Police

    39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 465 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Archambault v. Board of Supervisors

    33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Baker v. Supervisors ( 9 Hun, 440 ), and action continued to the Court of Appeals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Cole v. Board of Supervisors

    2 How. Pr. 483 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1884

    His bill was presented to the board of supervisors of the county of Greene for audit, and on the rejection of such bill, upon the ground that the same was not a legal charge against the county, the relator asks that a mandamus … Indeed, it was stated upon the argument that in refusing to obey the order the county treasurer acted by direction of the board of supervisors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Meehan v. Board of Supervisors

    52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887

    Mason v. Same, Appellant, with disbursements only.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Bray v. Board of Supervisors

    38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McDonough v. Board of Managers

    36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Thompson v. Board of Supervisors

    16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1876

    legal notices and advertisements, required by the laws of this State, or by any special law, to be published in the said county of Hamilton, shall be published in sueh newspaper or newspapers as shall be designated by the board … Section 61 requires the notices in question to be published in the newspapers designated to publish the Session Laws, and requires the boards of supervisors to audit and pay the expenses.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Hadley

    23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 113 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

    .: The question presented in this case is whether the Board of State Assessors had power to make the decision brought up for *114 review by the certiorari. … , and forward the same by mail within ten days thereafter to the clerk of said board of supervisors, directed to him at his post-office address.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hasbrouck v. Board of Supervisors

    73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Morgan v. Board of Supervisors

    67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1891

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lakeview Properties v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    124 Misc. 2d 156 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1984

    The landlord was obligated by the Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) order to inform the CAB within 60 days after resolution of the assessment controversy for the year 1975/1976. … The obvious impropriety of its pleading is dismissed by a statement that its law department is understaffed and that “only” two Judges have “questioned the Board’s answer.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shell's City, Inc. v. Florida Board of Pharmacy

    18 Fla. Supp. 138 · Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County · Jul 11, 1961

    That rule 2, passed by the Florida Board of Pharmacy on August 27, 1958, prohibiting the advertisement of the name or price of prescription drugs and products be, and the same is hereby declared to be unconstitutional and … That section 465.20, Florida Statutes, insofar as the same limits the time within which an appeal may be taken by any person aggrieved by any rule of the Florida Pharmacy Board, and prescribes the procedure for such an appeal

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cornell University v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    87 Misc. 2d 1060 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1976

    In the motions now before the court, plaintiffs seek summary judgment on their first cause of action, and defendants, the Conciliation and Appeals Board and the Housing and Development Administration, seek summary judgment … The court concludes, however, that the code provision is not "in accordance” with chapter 576 of the Laws of 1974, and is therefore void and unenforceable (see, Matter of Klein v Conciliation and Appeals Bd., 64 Misc 2d 329

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Deuchler v. Board of County Canvassers

    64 How. Pr. 334 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882

    S.], 206): “¡Nothing is committed to the judgment or discretion of the board. Their duty is arithmetical merely. … There was nothing in the original papers presented by the supervisor which the board had any power to object to.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Frances K. Powell, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    53 Misc. 2d 594 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1967

    Chamberlain v. Forrest ( 96 N. … made (see, also, Clark v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rutland, Ohio School Board v. Rutland Gas Co.

    88 Ohio Law. Abs. 421 · Ohio Public Utilities Commission · Sep 4, 1958

    Rutland Has Company has improperly and wrongfully discontinued all gas service to the Rutland High School; (3) That the said Rutland Has Company has refused, upon request, to restore such service, although the Rutland School Board … Rutland High School is dependent upon the service of the Rutland Gas Company for space heating its gymnasium, and for the heating of water in its locker and shower rooms; (5) That, in its Complaint, the said Rutland School Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Donnell v. Board of Education

    3 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 401 · Hancock County Court of Common Pleas · Sep 15, 1905

    The levy is made by the board of education .and the fund is created by the board setting aside a certain portion of the collections made. … V. Bope and John E. Priddy, for relators. Reed Meizler, City Solicitor, for respondents.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.