Case law

Board of Supervisors v. Sea View Railway Co.

30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 180 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1880

(Pierce v. Dart, 7 Cow., 609 ; Lansing v. Smith, 8 Id., 146.) Ocean Parkway is a public highway, laid out and improved, in pursuance of legislative provision, by the park commissioners of the city of Brooklyn. … Then the board of .supervisors of the county is to make annual provision by tax for the payment of interest on these certificates; and so much of them as shall be chargeable against the parcels of property assessed is to

People ex rel. Burnham v. Board of Supervisors

57 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1888

Barco Video v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 449 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 31, 1975

Whalen v. State of Illinois, Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board

30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 117 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Sep 26, 1974

Board of Trustees v. Deptartment of Environmental Conservation

67 Misc. 2d 180 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1971

(Matter of Stracquadanio v. Department of Health, 285 N. Y. 93, 96 ). The burden of supplying that proof is upon the petitioner. (Matter of Gambino v. State Liq. Auth., 4 A D 2d 37, affd. 4 N Y 2d 997.) … Co. v. Heller, 27 N Y 2d 212, 218-219.) The State is not necessarily bound by comments of a hearing officer.

Brown v. A Raft of Poplar & Oak Timber

1 Handy 13 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jul 1, 1854

Freedman v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

20 Pa. D. & C.2d 353 · Montgomery County Court of Quarter Sessions · Jun 30, 1959

For authority that the same rule applies to agreements of lease of real estate, see O’Neil v. Keegan, 376 Pa. 606 (1954). … Brown if Mr. Brown or his wife had objected to their right to apply for and obtain a so-called beer license, and he further testified that Mr.

Vitko v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

23 Pa. D. & C. 648 · Cambria County Court of Quarter Sessions · Jul 12, 1935

The board as an extrajudicial body has not only the powers literally conferred on it by statute, but also such powers as are implied necessarily from the grant of these statutory powers: Commonwealth v. … J. 168; Commonwealth v. Mutual Union Brewing Co., 252 Pa. 168 .

Myers-Brooks Publishing Co. v. Board of Supervisors

68 Misc. 2d 1033 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1972

(Matter of Relihan v. Brink, supra, p. 731 .) … (Botens v. Aronauer, 66 Mise 2d 5.)

City of Columbus v. State Employment Relations Board

29 Ohio Misc. 2d 35 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Mar 8, 1985

The Board erred in finding that public safety officers are ‘members of a police department.’ “V. … Canada, v.

Hamlet v. Board of County Commissioners

24 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 161 · Clark County Court of Common Pleas · Jun 15, 1922

Malsh v. Barron, Treas.. 61 O. S., 15. … In Hibben v. Smith, 191 U.

Di Sano v. Storandt

43 Misc. 2d 272 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1964

Respondents lay great stress on the landmark decision of the Supreme Court (Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U. S. 483 ) and attempt to draw an analogy between de jure and de facto segregation. … (Brown v. Board of Educ., 139 F. Supp. 468, 470 .) In Briggs v. Elliott ( 132 F. Supp. 776, 777 ) the court said: ‘ ‘ The Constitution, in other words, does not require integration. It merely forbids discrimination.”

Cincinnati v. Board of City Affairs

8 Ohio N.P. 500 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Jul 1, 1900

Thereupon said board awarded the contract,for said work to said Henkel & Brother. … See also Lang v. Simmons, 64 Wisc., 525; Hurd v. Krumer, 73 Miss., 177 , 55 Am. St. Rep. 520 ; Riley v. Warden, 2 Ed., Ch. 58; Seeman v. Barrett, 2 H. & C., 934; Kampfield v. Lang, 25 Fed. Rep., 128; In Re Thomas H.

Moore v. Board of Regents of the University

89 Misc. 2d 23 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1977

These and other powers were, in effect, confirmed by the Constitution of 1894 (see Institute of Metropolis v University of State of N. … However, an examination of the record discloses that there is a rational basis to support the determination of the commissioner (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231), whether that determination rested on

Board of Commissioners of Public Charities & Correction v. McGurrin

6 Daly 349 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Mar 6, 1876

By the metropolitan police act of 1866, •the commissioners of the board of health of the city were constituted the hoard of excise within the metropolitan police district, excluding the county of Westchester. … The 22d section of the act of 1857 gave the power to sue for such penalties only to the boards of commissioners of excise, *355 that act, in a previous section, having provided for the appointment of such a board in every

VACOM, Inc. v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

33 Va. Cir. 39 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Sep 22, 1993

VACOM alleges that the Board has refused to respond. By refusing to respond the County has refused or neglected VACOM’s claim. See Board of Supervisors v. Miller & Smith, 222 Va. 230 , 279 S.E.2d 158 (1981). 10. … In Kingsden East Realty v.

Halaby v. Board of Directors of the University

65 Ohio Law. Abs. 577 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jun 23, 1953

“The board of directors may receive other students on such terms as to tuition or otherwise as they see fit.” … The only reported case in Ohio in which similar statutory language has been construed is State ex rel Owens v.

Richardson v. Board of Trustees of Sycamore Township

6 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 505 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Feb 27, 1908

Section 3974 of the Revised Statutes reads, “that no member of a board of education shall have any pecuniary interest,, either direct or indirect, in any contract of the board,” and so on, practically the same as Section … (Bellaire Goblet Co. v. Findlay, 5 O. C. C., 418.)

State ex rel. Beakler v. Board of Education

19 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 88 · Clark County Court of Common Pleas · May 8, 1916

The relators allege that on the 13th day of December they filed with the defendant, the county board of education of Clark county, and the board of education of Greene county, a petition *89 addressed to the boards of said … State, ex rel, v. Commissioners, 36 O. S., 326. The action of a board of education may be controlled by mandamus in proper cases. State, ex rel, v. Board, 35 O. S., 368; State, ex rel, v. Board, 27 O. S., 96.

State ex rel. Merrill v. Board of Education

4 Ohio C.C. 97 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1889

It must also be conceded on the other side, under the decision of the Supreme Court in Chinn v. … The case of Dutten v.