Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.32s
People ex rel. Archambault v. Board of Supervisors
33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882
Baker v. Supervisors ( 9 Hun, 440 ), and action continued to the Court of Appeals.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Hoffman v. Board of Education
49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 659 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1886
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Woods v. Board of Police
39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 465 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Meehan v. Board of Supervisors
52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887
Mason v. Same, Appellant, with disbursements only.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Hadley
23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 113 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878
.: The question presented in this case is whether the Board of State Assessors had power to make the decision brought up for *114 review by the certiorari. … , and forward the same by mail within ten days thereafter to the clerk of said board of supervisors, directed to him at his post-office address.”
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Thompson v. Board of Supervisors
16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1876
legal notices and advertisements, required by the laws of this State, or by any special law, to be published in the said county of Hamilton, shall be published in sueh newspaper or newspapers as shall be designated by the board … Section 61 requires the notices in question to be published in the newspapers designated to publish the Session Laws, and requires the boards of supervisors to audit and pay the expenses.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. McDonough v. Board of Managers
36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Thomson v. Board of Supervisors
1 How. Pr. 116 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1845
Thought this court should not interfere; it was a question of which the board of supervisors had full jurisdiction. Motion denied.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJamison Electrical Construction Co. v. Board of Regents
13 Ct. Cl. 178 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublishedKanawha Office Equipment, Inc. v. Board of Regents
13 Ct. Cl. 179 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublishedSpatial Data Systems, Inc. v. Board of Regents
13 Ct. Cl. 166 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1980
Cited 0 timesPublishedDirect Mail Service Co. v. Board of Regents
12 Ct. Cl. 49 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1977
Cited 0 timesPublishedRubenstein v. Board of Regents of the University
177 Misc. 253 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1941
In Brown v. University of the State of New York (242 App. Div. 85; affd., 266 N. Y. 598 ) this rule was called into question. It was held to be invalid as unauthorized and exceeding statutory authority. … The only legislative action taken in the premises since the Brown case is chapter 406 of the Laws of 1935.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCentro Building Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals
21 Misc. 2d 964 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1960
This is a proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to compel the respondent, the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Bast Hills, to hear and determine the application of the petitioner … (Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago, 242 U. S. 526 .)
Cited 2 timesPublishedFieldfare Corp. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors
39 Va. Cir. 393 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Jun 25, 1996
Chamblin These consolidated cases are before the Court on the Applications to Correct Erroneous Assessment of Local Real Estate Tax and for Refund filed by Fieldfare Corporation against the Board of Supervisors of Loudoun … Harvey for the Board, and Robert Willingham, who did the actual assessment for the County, based their opinions on completely irrelevant or inaccurate information. None of the experts were guessing or speculating.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSteele v. State of Illinois, Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board
30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 12, 1974
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textGary Leasing, Inc. v. Town Board of Pendleton
127 Misc. 2d 194 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1985
In its memorandum of law, as authority for its action, the respondent Town Board cites General Business Law § 249 and the case of Port of N. Y. Auth. v Eastern Air Lines ( 259 F Supp 745 [1966]). … (See also, Town of Poestenkill v Sicho, 54 Misc 2d 191 .)
Cited 4 timesPublishedSuperior Court of Maine · Aug 31, 2004
CV-03-519 Roe ope STATE OF MAINE Office Wallace Brown, Cumberland, Ss, Clee et Plaintiff SUPERIOR CO AUG 31 2004 v. RECEIV ED ORDER Jeffrey A. … Box 287 Portland, Maine 04112-0287 WALLACE BROWN 10 HARDY ROAD FALMOUTH ME 04105
Cited 0 timesUnpublished20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 233 · Brown County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 15, 1917
of Brown county, Ohio, in the year of 1916 in pursuance of a resolution adopted by the board of county commissioners of said county, which said resolution in substance recites that said board of county commissioners have … Bentley & Sons Co., v. Pierce, Auditor, 95 O. S., - (reported in Ohio Law Reporter October 1, 1917). It may be argued that this case has no application to the case at bar.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 Misc. 3d 469 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2004
(Compare People v Brown, 7 AD3d 831, 832-833 [3d Dept 2004], with People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189, 199 [4th Dept 2001].) … (People v Brown, 302 AD2d at 920 [emphasis supplied].)
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna