Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.32s

  • People ex rel. Archambault v. Board of Supervisors

    33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 395 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1882

    Baker v. Supervisors ( 9 Hun, 440 ), and action continued to the Court of Appeals.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hoffman v. Board of Education

    49 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 659 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1886

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Woods v. Board of Police

    39 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 465 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Meehan v. Board of Supervisors

    52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 588 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1887

    Mason v. Same, Appellant, with disbursements only.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Board of Supervisors v. Hadley

    23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 113 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1878

    .: The question presented in this case is whether the Board of State Assessors had power to make the decision brought up for *114 review by the certiorari. … , and forward the same by mail within ten days thereafter to the clerk of said board of supervisors, directed to him at his post-office address.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Thompson v. Board of Supervisors

    16 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 60 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1876

    legal notices and advertisements, required by the laws of this State, or by any special law, to be published in the said county of Hamilton, shall be published in sueh newspaper or newspapers as shall be designated by the board … Section 61 requires the notices in question to be published in the newspapers designated to publish the Session Laws, and requires the boards of supervisors to audit and pay the expenses.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McDonough v. Board of Managers

    36 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 616 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Thomson v. Board of Supervisors

    1 How. Pr. 116 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1845

    Thought this court should not interfere; it was a question of which the board of supervisors had full jurisdiction. Motion denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jamison Electrical Construction Co. v. Board of Regents

    13 Ct. Cl. 178 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kanawha Office Equipment, Inc. v. Board of Regents

    13 Ct. Cl. 179 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spatial Data Systems, Inc. v. Board of Regents

    13 Ct. Cl. 166 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1980

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Direct Mail Service Co. v. Board of Regents

    12 Ct. Cl. 49 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rubenstein v. Board of Regents of the University

    177 Misc. 253 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1941

    In Brown v. University of the State of New York (242 App. Div. 85; affd., 266 N. Y. 598 ) this rule was called into question. It was held to be invalid as unauthorized and exceeding statutory authority. … The only legislative action taken in the premises since the Brown case is chapter 406 of the Laws of 1935.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Centro Building Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals

    21 Misc. 2d 964 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1960

    This is a proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to compel the respondent, the Board of Zoning Appeals of the Incorporated Village of Bast Hills, to hear and determine the application of the petitioner … (Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago, 242 U. S. 526 .)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fieldfare Corp. v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

    39 Va. Cir. 393 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Jun 25, 1996

    Chamblin These consolidated cases are before the Court on the Applications to Correct Erroneous Assessment of Local Real Estate Tax and for Refund filed by Fieldfare Corporation against the Board of Supervisors of Loudoun … Harvey for the Board, and Robert Willingham, who did the actual assessment for the County, based their opinions on completely irrelevant or inaccurate information. None of the experts were guessing or speculating.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Steele v. State of Illinois, Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 184 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Nov 12, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Gary Leasing, Inc. v. Town Board of Pendleton

    127 Misc. 2d 194 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1985

    In its memorandum of law, as authority for its action, the respondent Town Board cites General Business Law § 249 and the case of Port of N. Y. Auth. v Eastern Air Lines ( 259 F Supp 745 [1966]). … (See also, Town of Poestenkill v Sicho, 54 Misc 2d 191 .)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Thaler

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 31, 2004

    CV-03-519 Roe ope STATE OF MAINE Office Wallace Brown, Cumberland, Ss, Clee et Plaintiff SUPERIOR CO AUG 31 2004 v. RECEIV ED ORDER Jeffrey A. … Box 287 Portland, Maine 04112-0287 WALLACE BROWN 10 HARDY ROAD FALMOUTH ME 04105

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State ex rel. Lowe v. Wilson

    20 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 233 · Brown County Court of Common Pleas · Oct 15, 1917

    of Brown county, Ohio, in the year of 1916 in pursuance of a resolution adopted by the board of county commissioners of said county, which said resolution in substance recites that said board of county commissioners have … Bentley & Sons Co., v. Pierce, Auditor, 95 O. S., - (reported in Ohio Law Reporter October 1, 1917). It may be argued that this case has no application to the case at bar.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Barnes

    6 Misc. 3d 469 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2004

    (Compare People v Brown, 7 AD3d 831, 832-833 [3d Dept 2004], with People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189, 199 [4th Dept 2001].) … (People v Brown, 302 AD2d at 920 [emphasis supplied].)

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.