Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

2.47s

  • Rosen v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board

    202 Misc. 159 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1952

    of the Constitution (Cashman v. … Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 300 N.

    Reversed on other grounds by Rosen v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board, 282 A.D. 216 (1953)Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Henry County Zoning Appeals Board

    69 Va. Cir. 255 · Henry County Circuit Court · Nov 4, 2005

    Board of Zoning Appeals, 266 Va. 137 , 580 S.E.2d 796 (2003); Foster v. Geller, 248 Va. 563 , 449 S.E.2d 802 (1994); National Memorial Park v. … Board of Zoning, 232 Va. 89 , 348 S.E.2d 248 (1986); Board of Zoning Appeals v. Bond, 225 Va. 177 , 300 S.E.2d 781 (1983). Since the BZA applied erroneous principles of law, the presumption has been rebutted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Claim of Lacy v. Buffalo Board of Education

    89 Misc. 2d 255 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1977

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Sturdevant v. Board of Education

    8 Ohio N.P. 207 · Portage County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 15, 1901

    As I have suggested it seems to be impossible that it could be by the simple agreement between the Garreltsville Board of Education and the parent, because certainly that would be making conclusive upon the Board of Education … Then they cite the case of Burnet v. The Auditor of Portage county, 12 O. R., 57 I did not examine that case, because I did not know whether it would apply. Now since the decision of this case, in the first O.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Board of Education v. Raine

    2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 426 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1889

    By other sections, special school districts like No. 1 are authorized, and in both, boards of education are provided for. … And sec, 3908, a part of the general school law, which provides for the election of members of the board of education of the village district, says, that it shall be done, by.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Kuehnert v. Board of Education

    2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 438 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jan 15, 1889

    We think that the action of some members of the board of examiners, led the board of education to this belief, which they evidently entertained. But Mr. Kuehnert was no party to this arrangement. … This case will be continued for fifteen days, to allow action upon the part of the board of education.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Black v. Board of Education

    5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 379 · Hamilton Circuit Court · Jul 1, 1896

    We hold that an alternative writ of mandamus should not be allowed in this case, for the reason that, by the advertisement made for bids, the right was reserved to the board “to reject any and all bids,” and that in fact … If an advertisement was necessary, the statute, section 3988, gives the board such right to reject. If it is not required, it had the right to make such stipulations as it chose.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Millard v. Board of Com. of Lucas Co.

    7 Ohio Cir. Dec. 115 · Lucas Circuit Court · Feb 5, 1897

    Error is brought to reverse the action of the court, of common pleas, in rendering a judgment against plaintiff in error, in an action brought by the board of county commissioners against Millard, in regard to certain fees … is correct; and the reasons upon which that court proceeded to the judgment against the plaintiff in error are so well stated .in the opinion that was rendered by the judge of that court — which will be found in Com'rs v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Kuehnert v. Board of Education

    4 Ohio C.C. 93 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1889

    I think the action of the board of education upon the allowance of the peremptory writ issued against them, was a substantial compliance with the order of the court, and that they should be dismissed. … But from the return of *97 the board and the evidence taken thereunder, I am convinced that it was their intention to so allow him, and that it was a fair compensation, and so understood by the parties, and that the subsequent

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Goff v. Board of Education

    21 Ohio C.C. 383 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jan 15, 1901

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Gaines v. State Medical Board

    22 Ohio C.C. Dec. 687 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jun 5, 1909

    State v. Barberton (Bd. of Ed.), 76 Ohio St. 297 [81 N. E. Rep. 568; 10 Ann. Cas. 879]. … How then can we say that the board has abused the discretion vested in it and grant relief, when the rule of law justifying interference by the courts requires that such abuse be clearly shown? Sycamore (Bd. of Ed.) v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Cahoo v. Board of Elections

    8 Ohio Cir. Dec. 215 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Mar 31, 1898

    I read from the case of State-ex rel. v. Archibald, Sheriff, 52 O. S., 1. … intended to abolish the existing board without providing some other board in its place?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atkin v. New York City Teachers' Retirement Board

    39 Misc. 2d 646 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1963

    It appears from the Tenth Annual Report of the Retirement Board for 1932 that investigation and finding were made. … Section B2CL13.0 of the Administrative Code provides that after investigation and valuation by the board actuary, the board shall ‘4 Adopt for the retirement system such mortality, service and other tables as shall be deemed

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Cole v. Board of Supervisors

    2 How. Pr. 483 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1884

    His bill was presented to the board of supervisors of the county of Greene for audit, and on the rejection of such bill, upon the ground that the same was not a legal charge against the county, the relator asks that a mandamus … Indeed, it was stated upon the argument that in refusing to obey the order the county treasurer acted by direction of the board of supervisors.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Youmans v. Board of Supervisors

    9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 102 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

    The record of the proceedings of said board is as follows: Resolved, That we as a board of supervisors decline to change or interfere with William Toumans’ assessment as to rents reserved in the towns of Kortright and Davenport … The board of supervisors erred in refusing to interfere with such assessments on the ground that it had no power or discretion in the matter.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Tanner v. Board of Supervisors

    32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 312 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. McCarthy v. Board of Police

    34 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 467 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1882

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Bray v. Board of Supervisors

    38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 88 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1883

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Hasbrouck v. Board of Supervisors

    73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 633 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1892

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Morgan v. Board of Supervisors

    67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1891

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.