Case law

Dombroff v. State Board for Professional Medical Conduct

131 Misc. 2d 472 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1986

For a decision upholding the use of in camera affidavits to satisfy the good-faith requirement specified in Matter of Levin v Murawski (supra) see Bazin v Guest (NY County, index No. 26626/85), decided by the undersigned … Coupled with the delay in its issuance, the actions of the Board hardly bespeak of a rush to judgment. In Ackerman v State Bd. of Professional Med.

Vesilind v. Virginia State Board of Elections

91 Va. Cir. 490 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Jan 29, 2016

The Defendants and Defendant-Intervenors now move for a stay of the proceedings until resolution of the appeal of Bethune-Hill et al. v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al., 3:14-cv-00952 (E.D. … Board *494 of Supervisors of Fluvanna Cnty. v. Davenport & Co., L.L.C., 285 Va. 580 , 586 (2013) (quoting Greenburg v. Collier, 482 F. Supp. 200, 202 (E.D. Va. 1979)); see also Lee v.

King v. Lowry

20 Barb. 532 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1855

The plaintiffs proved that the supplies were delivered on board the Pacific, that they rendered a bill to Brown, that it was last seen in his possession, and that it had been inspected by the other defendants. … Schermerhorn v. Loines, ( 7 John. 311 ;) Muldon v. Whitlock, (1 Cowen, 290,) and Higgins v. Packard, ( 2 Hall, 547 ,) are conclusive on this point, and have never been questioned. 2.

Board of Supervisors v. McQueen

22 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 551 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1878

power .in the plaintiff to enter into it, in ,so far as it relates to the provision sought to be enforced by the defendant, on which the alleged breach is.based. .This .objection is answered by the decision,in De Groff v.

Dynasty Construction v. Arlington County Board of Supervisors

73 Va. Cir. 428 · Arlington County Circuit Court · Jul 16, 2007

On December 28,2005, Dynasty appealed the County Manager’s decision in both cases to the Arlington County Board. … Plaintiff cites Brancris, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 1992 WL 884789 (Fairfax Cir. Ct. 1992), to demonstrate that a circuit court has the authority to later determine that an appeal bond is excessive.

Pino v. City of Chesapeake School Board

92 Va. Cir. 205 · Chesapeake County Circuit Court · Dec 4, 2015

Glazebrook v. Board of Supervisors of Spotsylvania County, 266 Va. 550, 554, 587 S.E.2d 589, 591 (2003). … Kellam v. School Bd. of the City of Norfolk, 202 Va. 252, 254, 117 S.E.2d 96, 97 (1960). The legislature has waived a school board’s sovereign immunity to a limited degree. Pursuant to Va.

McLafferty v. Conshohocken Borough Zoning Hearing Board

10 Pa. D. & C.5th 548 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Feb 17, 2010

Inc. v. Heartland Properties, 712 A.2d 331, 332 (Pa. Super. 1998) (quoting Pa.R.A.P. 341(c)). … Pa.R.C.P. 213(a); see e.g., Keefer v. Keefer, 741 A.2d 808, 810 (Pa. Super. 1999).

Blake v. Board of Supervisors of Livingston County

61 Barb. 149 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1871

(Brainerd v. New York and Harlem R. R. Co., 25 N. Y. 496 , and cases there cited.) The decisions to that effect, in this State at least, are uniform, and the rule is too well settled to admit of doubt or .challenge.

Home Builders Ass'n v. Allegheny County Plumbing Board

50 Pa. D. & C.2d 275 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County · Jul 15, 1970

The plumbing board is a 17-member board appointed by the Allegheny County Board of Commissioners pursuant to Section 2209.1 of the Allegheny County Plumbing Code. … A pleading containing improper matter should only be stricken upon a showing of real prejudice: Fromm v. Fromm, supra, at page 84; Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v.

Johnson v. Chesapeake City School Board

52 Va. Cir. 252 · Chesapeake County Circuit Court · May 15, 2000

Bd. of Spotsylvania County v. McConnell, 215 Va. 603 , 212 S.E.2d 264 (1975). … Even if the Court disagrees with the decision reached by the School Board, it cannot overturn the board’s decision if the board gave fair consideration and debate to the issue. See Fishel v. Frederick County Sch.

Gill v. Stafford County School Board

26 Va. Cir. 228 · Stafford County Circuit Court · Jan 14, 1992

In Martin v. School Board of Prince George County, 3 Va. … Id. *233 See also, Barnett v. Fairfax County School Board, 927 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1991); Tice v. Botetourt County School Board, 908 F.2d 1200 (4th Cir. 1990); Burke County Board of Education v.

Chesterfield County School Board v. Fuller

26 Va. Cir. 150 · Chesterfield County Circuit Court · Dec 12, 1991

Pendleton v. Commonwealth, 110 Va. 229 (1909). … Union Trust Corporation v. Fugate, 172 Va. 82, 92 (1939), quoting, Mears v. Accomac Banking Co., 160 Va. 311, 321 (1933).

Morris v. Board of Supervisors of Herkimer County

50 Misc. 2d 929 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1966

Ct, Oneida County, 1966], mod: 25 A D 2d 202 [4th Dept., 1966]; Graham v. Board of Supervisors of Erie County, 49 Misc 2d 459 [Sup. Ct., Erie County, 1966]; Dona v. Board of Super *932 visors of County of St. … A number of other State courts have rejected weighted voting (Brown v. State Election Bd., 369 p. 2d 140 [1962, Old.]; Cargo v. Campbell, No. 33273, U. S. Dist. Ct., Santa Fe County, N. M., 1964; Jackman v.

Glenville Gage Co. v. Industrial Board of Appeals

95 Misc. 2d 648 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1978

(Matter of Dumbleton v Reed, 49 AD2d 687 , mod on other grounds 40 NY2d 586 .) … (Watson v Prentice-Hall, 50 AD2d 1077 .)

Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of County Commissioners

278 Or. App. 472 · Yamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon · May 25, 2016

However, as we explained in Kleikamp v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 57, 59-60 , 246 P3d 56 (2010), Measure 37 “was controversial. … See Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 46, 48 , 245 P3d 688 (2010).

People ex rel. Sanderson v. Board of Canvassers

64 How. Pr. 201 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882

to the board of the result of the election held in November last for correction. … By the return made to the board of county canvassers by the inspectors of election, Manly B.

Sundlun v. Board of Zoning Appeals

23 Va. Cir. 53 · Virginia Circuit Court · Jan 8, 1991

In Brown v. … Board of Supervisors, 227 Va. 580 (1984); Board of Supervisors v. Rowe, 216 Va. 128 (1975).

Fairview Co. v. Board of Supervisors

21 Va. Cir. 193 · Spotsylvania County Circuit Court · Sep 6, 1990

Virginia Code 5 8.01-273; West Alexandria Properties v. First Virginia Mortgage, 221 Va. 134 (1980). Viewed in that light, the facts are as follows. … See Czajkowski v. Planning and Zoning Board, 540 A.2d 716 (Conn. 1988); 82 Am. Jur. 2d, Zoning sect. 167. Here, however, the County did not disapprove Fairview’s plat on the ground it violates the zoning ordinance.

Board of Supervisors v. Deyoe

22 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 526 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1878

(Town of Venice v. Woodruff, 62 N. Y., 462 .) Fourth. The plaintiffs urge the so-called omnibus suit, growing out of the Schuyler frauds. (New York and New Haven R. R. Co. v. Schuyler, 17 N. Y., 592 , and 34 id., 30.)

Pinsley v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

91 Misc. 2d 266 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1977

This is an article 78 proceeding which seeks an order requiring the New York State Racing and Wagering Board (hereinafter the board) to act on an appeal filed by the petitioner. … The board has adopted and promulgated its own rules. They apply to all —to the board as well as to the horsemen. They must be complied with by all.