Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.36s
Alamango v. Board of Supervisors
32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 551 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1881
(Lorillard v. Town of Monroe, 11 N. Y., 392 ; Brown v. People, 75 id., 441, 442 .) The duty of punishing criminals is inherent in the Sovereign power. … (Russell v. Men of Devon, 2 Term, 667; Hill v. Boston, 122 Mass., 344 , and cases cited; Hallenbeck v. Winnebago Co., 35 Am., 151; Kincaid v. Hardin Co., 36 id., 236; Woods v. Conway Co., 7 N. W.
Cited 0 timesPublished9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 392 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874
Co. v. Marsh, 2 Kernan, 308. Harmony v. Bingham, 2 Kernan, 116; Silliman v. Wing, 7 Hill, 159 ; Supervisors of Onondaga v. Briggs, 2 Denio, 39 ; Commercial Bank of Rochester v. City of Rochester, 41 Barb., 342 . … Meacham v. Burke, 54 N. Y., 219 ; Viele v. Troy & Boston R. R. Co., 20 id., 184; Grant v. Morse, 22 id., 323. Chap. 774, Sess. Laws 1867. Supra. Supra Bank of U. S. v. Bank of Washington, 6 Peters, 8 ; Chegaray v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGinsberg v. Board of County Commissioners
5 Fla. Supp. 165 · Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County · Apr 21, 1954
Compare Ervin v. Taylor (Fla.), 66 So. 2d 816 . … See Ervin v. City of North Miami Beach (Fla.), 66 So. 2d 235 ; Ervin v. Taylor, supra; and State Department of Public Welfare v. Melser (Fla.), 69 So. 2d 347 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedHickey v. Board of Dental Examiners
10 Fla. Supp. 12 · Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County · Dec 5, 1955
board in its order must be construed to mean that the board acted on the lesser degree of proof represented by the expression “preponderance of the evidence.” … Goldman v.
Cited 0 timesPublished11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 569 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1875
It appeared by the contract that the last payment was not to be made until a certificate of the superintendent of school buildings, that the payment was due, had been filed in the office of the clerk of the board of education … (Coon v. The S. and U. R. R. Co., 5 N. Y., 492 ; Warner v. Erie R. Co., 39 id., 468; Brickner v. N. Y. C. R. R. Co., 49 id., 672; Laning v. Same, id., 521; Flike v. Boston and A. R. R. Co., 53 id., 549 ; Wright v. N. Y.
Cited 0 timesPublished111 Bar, Inc. v. Board of Liquor Control
75 Ohio Law. Abs. 247 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Nov 9, 1955
The law is well established that a permit holder is responsible for the acts of his employees which are in violation of the Liquor Control Act or Regulations of the Board of Liquor Control. See Wallace v. … Board of Liquor Control, 64 Abs 477 . Knowledge of solicitation on the part of the waitress, an employe of the permit holder, may be imputed to the permit holder. See Wittenberg v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRutch v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board
6 Pa. D. & C.5th 180 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County · Dec 17, 2008
Hyland Enterprises Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 158 Pa. Commw. 283, 288-89 , 631 A.2d 789, 792 (1993). … See Street Road Bar & Grille Inc. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 583 Pa. 72, 93-94 , 876 A.2d 346, 358-59 (2005); see also, V.J.R. Bar Corporation v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWallace Holdings, LLC v. Brown
2024 NY Slip Op 51114(U) · Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Bronx County · Aug 28, 2024
Wallace Holdings, LLC v Brown ( 2024 NY Slip Op 51114(U) ) [*1] Wallace Holdings, LLC v Brown 2024 NY Slip Op 51114(U) Decided on August 28, 2024 Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Bronx County Ibrahim, J. … Respondent points out that alleged repairs and access dates are included in both stipulations. ( see Brown affidavit at NYSCEF Doc. 10).
Cited 1 timesUnpublished2 Perlman Drive, LLC v. Board of Assessors
9 Misc. 3d 382 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2005
Co. v Americo Group, 294 AD2d 222 (1st Dept 2002); Salvation Army v Alverson, 157 Misc 2d 416, 418 (Civ Ct, NY County 1992). . … Board of Assessors [ 4 Misc 3d 1027(A) , 2004 NY Slip Op 51075(U) (Sup Ct, Albany County)], wherein one subtracts the new occupancy rate from the old one to yield the change in occupancy rate). .
Cited 1 timesPublishedChamberlin v. Dade County School Board
17 Fla. Supp. 183 · Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County · May 10, 1961
McCollum v. Board of Education (1948), 333 U. S. 203 , 68 S. Ct. 461 , as a precedent for a ruling in this ease. … In Billard v. Board of Education (1904), 69 Kan. 53 , 76 P. 422 , 66 L.R.A. 166 , 105 Am St.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWright v. Board of Public Instruction
8 Fla. Supp. 139 · Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Sumter County · Sep 29, 1955
In that opinion the court quoted from its opinion in Board of Public Distraction of Putnam County v. Wright, 77 So. 2d 770 (an opinion which had not then been filed) — “ . . . … Gables Racing Ass’n v. Persky, 156 So. 392 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedKilbourne v. Board of Supervisors of Sullivan Co.
41 N.Y. St. Rep. 838 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1891
Bridges, supervisor, v. The Board of Supervisors, 92 N. Y., 571 . These two statutes may be read together, and effect given to-both, without any impairment of the provisions of either. … Clark v. Sheldon, 106 N. Y., 104 ; 8 St. Rep., 537 ; Hand v. Supervisors of Columbia Co., 31 Hun, 531 ; Strough v. Supervisors of Jefferson Co., 50 Hun, 54 ; 23 St.
Cited 1 timesPublishedIndustrial Board v. Hilti Rapid Fastening Systems, Inc.
28 Pa. D. & C.2d 11 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · May 28, 1962
B. v. Kaufmann Dept. … Thompson Products, Inc., 97 Fed. 2d 13, 15; *23 National Labor Relations Board v. Union Pacific Stages, Inc., 99 Fed. 2d 153, 177.’”
Cited 1 timesPublishedMcLafferty v. Conshohocken Borough Zoning Hearing Board
10 Pa. D. & C.5th 548 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Feb 17, 2010
Inc. v. Heartland Properties, 712 A.2d 331, 332 (Pa. Super. 1998) (quoting Pa.R.A.P. 341(c)). … Pa.R.C.P. 213(a); see e.g., Keefer v. Keefer, 741 A.2d 808, 810 (Pa. Super. 1999).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDanis v. Commissioners of the Board of Elections
30 Misc. 2d 133 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1961
Oakes was filed with the Board of Elections at *134 1:25 p.m. on August 8,1961, and at 4:00 p.m. on the same day, a petition on behalf of Barbara S. Danis and Joseph M. Oakes was also filed with the Board of Elections. … Murphy and Lucille Johnson was filed with the Board of Elections at 1:25 p.m. on August 8,1961, and a petition on behalf of Caesar J. Mauti and John A. Murphy was filed with the board on the same day at 4:00 p.m.
Cited 2 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Simpson v. Board of Police Com'rs
31 N.Y.S. 112 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Oct 15, 1894
It seems that the police board, by a divided vote, declined to print the relator’s name upon the official ballot, on the ground that one Timothy J. … Campbell claimed to have been nominated by the same convention for the same office, and the board was divided as to whether the name of Simpson or Campbell should go upon the ticket.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCrutchfield v. State Water Control Board
55 Va. Cir. 92 · Richmond County Circuit Court · Mar 15, 2001
Virginia Real Estate Comm’n v. Bias, 226 Va. 264, 268-269 (1983). … See also Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 366 (2001). Petitioners own the land known as Newcastle Farm, which borders the Pamunkey River.
Cited 0 timesPublishedG.T.I. Co. v. Assessor & Assessment Board of Review
88 Misc. 2d 806 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1976
Company (MID-HUDSON) against respondents, the Assessor and the Assessment Board of Review of the City of Kingston, New York. This proceeding has been brought under article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Sanderson v. Board of Canvassers
64 How. Pr. 201 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882
to the board of the result of the election held in November last for correction. … By the return made to the board of county canvassers by the inspectors of election, Manly B.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWilliams v. Northampton County School Board
58 Va. Cir. 158 · Virginia Circuit Court · Jan 11, 2002
In Spotsylvania School Board v. McConnell, 215 Va. 603 (1975), the court states at page 606 that there is no statute or case governing the scope of review of a school board’s decision to dismiss a teacher. … See Bristol School Board v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna