Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

1.53s

  • Wright v. Board of Public Instruction

    8 Fla. Supp. 139 · Circuit Court of the 5th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Sumter County · Sep 29, 1955

    In that opinion the court quoted from its opinion in Board of Public Distraction of Putnam County v. Wright, 77 So. 2d 770 (an opinion which had not then been filed) — “ . . . … Gables Racing Ass’n v. Persky, 156 So. 392 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Andrus v. Board of Auditors

    16 Misc. 92 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1896

    This is an application for a writ of mandamus against the board of audit of the town of Champlain, requiring it to reconvene and audit the claim .presented by the relator to the said board at its last, meeting in 1895. … It is not disputed that it was the duty of the board of audit to audit and allow all proper claims made *93 against the said town, as provided by section 165 of chapter 458 of the Laws of 1893.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ellison v. Board of Appeals

    28 Misc. 2d 552 · New York Supreme Court · May 1, 1961

    (Matter of Ellison v. Board of Appeals of City of Long Beach, 25 Misc 2d 749 .) … Matter of Reed v. Board of Stds. & Appeals ( 255 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Onondaga County Water District v. Board of Assessors

    67 Misc. 2d 797 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1971

    (Matter of Onondaga County Water Dist. v. Board of Assessors, 55 Misc 2d 481 , affd. 30 A D 2d 643, mot. for lv. to app. den. 22 N Y 2d 645.) … Parhlin Operating Corp. v. Miller, 287 N. Y. 126 ; Matter of Queensbury Hotel Corp. v. Board of Assessors of City of Glens Falls, 33 Misc 2d 302 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dunavon v. Board of Education

    54 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 13 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1888

    Sims v. The Board of Fire Commissioners of the City of New York ( 13 N. … (See, also, Gillespie v. The Mayor, etc., 6 Daly, 286 ; The City of Chicago v. Edwards, 58 Illinois, 252; The City of Madison v. Korbly, 32 Indiana, 74.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Industrial Board v. Hilti Rapid Fastening Systems, Inc.

    28 Pa. D. & C.2d 11 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · May 28, 1962

    B. v. Kaufmann Dept. … Thompson Products, Inc., 97 Fed. 2d 13, 15; *23 National Labor Relations Board v. Union Pacific Stages, Inc., 99 Fed. 2d 153, 177.’”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ehrlich v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

    124 Misc. 2d 217 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1984

    This is a petition brought by the tenants of an apartment in New York City to annul a determination of the Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) which dismissed a petition on the grounds of loss of jurisdiction. … , 294 NY 180 ; Waddey v Waddey, 290 NY 251 ; Jacobus v Colgate, 217 NY 235, 245 ).

    Questioned by Ziess v. Semenov, 126 Misc. 2d 917 (1985)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wodetzky v. Board of Education

    173 Misc. 136 · City of New York Municipal Court · Nov 21, 1939

    See, also, Yellow Pine Co. v. Board of Education, 15 Misc. 58 ; Caldwell v. Board of Education , 127 id. 492; Matter of Hirshfield v. Cook, 227 N. Y. 297 ; Gunnison v. Board of Education , 176 id. 11; Mack v. … Y. 459 ; Gunnison v. Board of Education of City of New York, supra; Herman v. Board of Education, supra; Lessin v. Board of Education, supra.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Simpson v. Board of Police Com'rs

    31 N.Y.S. 112 · The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · Oct 15, 1894

    It seems that the police board, by a divided vote, declined to print the relator’s name upon the official ballot, on the ground that one Timothy J. … Campbell claimed to have been nominated by the same convention for the same office, and the board was divided as to whether the name of Simpson or Campbell should go upon the ticket.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Michel v. Board of Supervisors

    46 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 47 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1886

    The cases of Francis v. Schoellkopf ( 53 N. Y., 152 ) and Wiel v. Stewart ( 19 Hun, 272 ) we think justify the ruling. … The case of Wiel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Gentilesco v. Board of Excise Commissioners

    27 N.Y.S. 983 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Feb 15, 1894

    The application of Guiseppe Gentilesco for a transfer of a saloon liquor license from No. 19 Cherry street to No. 100 Bayard street, in the city of New York, was rejected by the board of excise commissioners, “for the reason … Beer Co. v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25 ; Stone v. Mississippi, 101 U. S. 814 ; Butchers’, etc., Co. v. Crescent, etc., Co., 111 U. S, 746, 4 Sup. Ct. 652; Bish. Cont. § 564.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Sprague v. Board of Excise

    36 N.Y.S. 678 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1895

    In People v. Fire Com’rs of City of New York, 73 N. … And in People v. Commissioners Dept. Fire & Buildings, 106 N. Y. 67 , 12 N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hand v. Board of Supervisors

    38 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 531 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1884

    (Bridges v. Board of Supervisors of Sullivan County, 92 N. Y., 570 .) The cases cited by the defendant seem to me to have no application to the principle involved in this statute.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Wilson v. Board of Trustees

    13 N.Y.S. 447 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1891

    of trustees as a board, and not in the individual members. … Cas. 79 ; People v. Lane, 55 N. Y. 219 ; Foot v. Stiles, 57 N. Y. 399 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ensign v. Board of Supervisors

    32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 20 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1881

    Van Keunen v. Town Auditors, 74 N. Y., 316 .) … (Bigelow v. Inhabitants of Randolph, 14 Gray, 541 ; Chidsey v. Town of Canton, 17 Conn., 475 ; Reed v. Inhabitants of Belfast, 20 Maine, 246; Eastman v. Town of Meredith, 36 N. H., 284.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Boardman v. Board of Supervisors

    29 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 231 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1880

    In the case of Williams v. Supervisors ( 78 N. Y. 565 ), Judge Rapallo, in the prevailing, opinion, says: “ This provision, if standing alone, would doubtless authorize the assessment complained of.” … Ho therefore insists that the decision in the case of Williams v. Supervisors is decisive of the present.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Green v. Board of Education

    11 N.Y.S. 296 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1890

    A mandamus was granted by J udge Fursman, requiring the board of education to meet at a certain time, and organize, and appoint a president. The board appealed'. … The fact that it had done so was admitted in court by the board.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Duval County School Board

    1 Fla. Supp. 2d 44 · Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Duval County · Oct 8, 1979

    Duval County School Board, 346 So.2d 644 (Fla. DCA 1st-1977) and Alford v. Duval County School Board, 324 So.2d 174 (Fla. … See Arnold v. State Board of Education, 344 So.2d 908 (Fla. DCA 1st-1977). Also see City of Jacksonville v. Arnold, 343 So.2d 962 (Fla.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marmaduke v. Harvey, Brake & Co.

    2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 291 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Oct 15, 1872

    Marmaduke & Brown immediately wrote to Harvey, Drake & Co., informing them of the whole transaction, as *293 serting their ownership, and directing them to sell the wheat and account to them, Marmaduke & Brown. ,It is probable … concerned, Marmaduke & Brown might well have maintained an action of replevin for the same.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Satz v. Board of Public Instruction

    36 Fla. Supp. 38 · Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Miami-Dade County · Jul 14, 1971

    Canney v. Board of Public Instruction of Alachua County, 231 So.2d 34 . … Blackwell v. Issaquena County Board of Education, 5 cir. (1966) 363 F. 2d 749 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.