Case law

Grove v. Chemung County Board of Supervisors

50 Misc. 2d 418 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1966

I, §§ 1 and 11; Seaman v. Fedourich, 16 N Y 2d 94.) … Board of Supervisors of the County of Sullivan, 25 A D 2d 688, affg. 46 Misc 2d 837 ; Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors of Westchester County, 49 Misc 2d 116 ).

Gertum v. Board of Supervisors

12 N.Y. St. Rep. 659 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1887

It is doubtful whether the legislature could have validated the title of such an officer (People v. Gardiner, 43 N. … In the case of People v. Mann ( 97 N.

Onondaga County Water District v. Board of Assessors

55 Misc. 2d 481 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1967

This court is not unmindful of the 1964 Supreme Court decision of Niagara County Water Dist. v. Board of Assessors of Town of Grand Island ( 55 Misc 2d 478 ) decided by Honorable Carlton A.

Brubaker v. Montgomery County Board of Elections

71 Ohio Law. Abs. 99 · Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas · May 11, 1955

State, ex Brubaker, v. Brown, Sec’y of State, 163 Oh St 241. That decision, not yet jounalized, is subject to the condition expressed in §703.06 R. … State, ex rel, v. Board (Kettering cases on appeal 1953), 65 Abs 547 .

Cookie's Diner, Inc. v. Columbus Board of Health

65 Ohio Misc. 2d 65 · Franklin County Municipal Court · Aug 9, 1994

, unless or until the General Assembly enacts a statute directing the boards to act on that specific new health hazard or disease, the boards could not. Jackson v. … The New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v.

Genesee Valley National Bank v. Board of Supervisors

53 Barb. 223 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1869

Wanwyck, (not reported,) as Judge Bacon states in the case of Swift v. The City of Poughkeepsie, ( 37 N. Y. Rep. 512 ,) and in Barhyte v. Shepard, (35 id. 238.) I cannot see why the case of Swift v. … The dictum, or suggestion in The People v.

Tucker v. New York State Board of Pharmacy

127 Misc. 538 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1926

Y., under a registration certificate issued to him by the New York Board of Pharmacy. The petitioner was not a licensed pharmacist. … The petitioner sent his registration certificate to the Board to have it indorsed over to his new address, but the Board refused to transfer the registration.

Carver v. Spotsylvania County Board of Supervisors

12 Va. Cir. 94 · Spotsylvania County Circuit Court · Jun 23, 1987

Board of Supervisors v. Combs, 160 Va. 487, 493 (1933). A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedial process, which is not awarded as a matter of right but in the exercise of a sound judicial discretion. ... … In Richmond Funeral Directors’ Association v.

Board of Directors v. Crossland Savings F.S.B.

19 Va. Cir. 8 · Alexandria County Circuit Court · May 15, 1989

Union Camp Corp. v. Lewis, 385 F.2d 143 (4th Cir. 1967). … See, Burton v. Chesapeake Box, et al., 190 Va. 755, 767 (1950). Plank’s Demurrer to Count 5 will be overruled.

Ridenour v. Board of Education

72 N.Y. St. Rep. 155 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1895

People v. Thompson, 94 N. Y. 451 ; People v. Morton, 148 N. Y. 156 . … Gillis v. Space, 63 Barb. 177 ; Wait v. Ray, 67 N. Y. 36 .

Cushing v. Board of Health

13 N.Y. St. Rep. 783 · Superior Court of Buffalo · Dec 15, 1887

The power has been repeatedly recognized and affirmed,” citing Metropolitan Board of Health v. Heister ( 37 N. Y., 664 ); Health Department v. Adam Knoll ( 70 N. Y., 530 ); The People ex rel Cox v. … Weil v. Ricord, 9 C. E. Green, 173.

People ex rel. White v. Board of Managers

79 Misc. 494 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1913

It is also claimed that there is no judgment of any court whereby the board of managers was authorized to. receive and hold the child. … Trainer v. Baker, 89 N. Y. 460 .

Chang v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

26 Va. Cir. 456 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Mar 3, 1988

The County Attorney cites two authorities in the zoning field and Hensen v. City of Norfolk, 201 Neb. 352 , and Malley v. … The action of the Board in moving to executive session and then returning with the announced change from R-l to R-2 is not without problems. See, San Antonio v. Pope, 351 S.W.2d 269 .

Brown & Thomas Automobile Co. v. Rully

18 Conn. Supp. 494 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Jan 28, 1954

Fogil v. Boody, 76 Conn. 194, 196 , citing Potter v. Douglass, 44 Conn. 541 . *497 2. … Perryman Burns Coal Co. v. Seaboard Coal Co., 128 Conn. 70, 73 , citing Hanley Co. v. American Cement Co., 108 Conn. 469, 472 ; Potter v. Douglass, 44 Conn. 541, 546 ; 6 Williston, Contracts (Rev. Ed.), §§1854, 1856.

Donovan v. Board of Education

12 Jones & S. 53 · The Superior Court of New York City · Apr 1, 1878

Board of Health, 10 N. Y. 409 ; Brady v. Supervisors, Id. 260). … (Bassett v.

John Braghirol v. Town Board of Chester

70 Misc. 2d 812 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1972

In Matter of Town of Huntington v. … Justice Gulotta in his opinion in the above case cites Matter of Vill. of Russell Gardens v. Board of Zoning Appeals ( 30 Misc 2d 392 ), and Matter of Browning v. Bryant (178 Misc. 576 , affd. 264 App.

Colonna v. Erie County Retirement Board

16 Pa. D. & C.3d 131 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Oct 21, 1980

The retirement board claims that the suit brought against the board must include the county, since the board by itself lacks the authority to transfer moneys to the state fund. … See Bellotti v. Spaeder, 433 Pa. 219 , 249 A. 2d 343 (1969) (statute of limitations in personal injury action, which em *136 ploys language identical to section 5527(6), found to be waivable).

Biggs v. Zoning Board of Appeals

52 Misc. 3d 694 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2016

As a general matter, “a zoning board’s interpretation of a zoning law is afforded great deference and will only be disturbed ‘if it is irrational or unreasonable.’ ” (Matter of Meier v Village of Champlain Zoning Bd. of Appeals … 2012] [no deference to board of zoning appeals where issue is pure legal interpretation], l v denied 19 NY3d 811 [2012].)

Fatscher v. Board of School Directors

75 Pa. D. & C.2d 164 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Jan 6, 1976

See Kretzler v. Ohio Township, supra; Shellem v. Springfield School Dist., 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 515 , 297 A. 2d 182 (1972); Acitelli v. … As stated by the Supreme Court in Travis v.

Kleinman v. Zoning Board of Appeals

6 Pa. D. & C.2d 659 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County · Sep 29, 1955

In Dooling’s Windy Hill v. Springfield Township, 371 Pa. 290 , the subject property was located in “E Business District’', where a premises might be used as a hotel, boarding house or restaurant by special exception. … Zoning Case, 361 Pa. 322, 328 ; see also Silverco, Inc., v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 379 Pa. 497, 500 .