Case law

Stambaugh v. Zoning Hearing Board

36 Pa. D. & C.3d 367 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County · Dec 12, 1984

Pittsburgh Board of Adjustment, 437 Pa. 481 , 263 A.2d 670 (1970); Valley View Civic Association v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 501 Pa. 550 , 462 A.2d 637 (1983). … The facts and issues in this case are almost identical to those found in Munchback v. Hulmeville Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment, 76 York Leg. R.41 (Bucks County 1961).

Cole v. Town Board of Hempstead

52 Misc. 2d 279 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1965

As stated in Matter of Chase v. … In Matter of Neff v.

Board of Education v. Dobson Construction Co.

67 Misc. 2d 1094 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1971

Kranzel v. Zoning Hearing Board

75 Pa. D. & C.2d 253 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County · Jul 9, 1975

Moreover, zoning statutes must be rigidly adhered to and strictly followed: Blank v. Board of Adjustment, 390 Pa. 636 , 136 A. 2d 695 (1957). Accordingly, statutory appeal periods must be strictly enforced: Kuiper v. … In citing City of Trenton v. Fowler-Thorn Co., 57 N. J. Superior 196, 154 A. 2d 369 (1959), affirmed 32 N.

Chernock v. Liquor Control Board

66 Pa. D. & C.2d 320 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County · Aug 13, 1974

“Discretion to determine whether or riot a municipality is located within a resort area is, by the express language of the Liquor Code, vested in the Board. … and the order of the board is affirmed.

Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. Pastor

39 Pa. D. & C.2d 641 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Apr 21, 1966

Woodside v. … The Commonwealth directs attention to the case of *645 Ullom v.

Price v. Community Action Board

62 Pa. D. & C.2d 668 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County · Aug 11, 1972

However, the suit was subsequently discontinued as to defendant, Community Action Board, since the West Chester Community Center had been plaintiff’s employer. … It was held in Kaelin v.

Biechy v. Bangor Park Board

55 Pa. D. & C.2d 352 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County · Mar 6, 1972

reasonably anticipate careless or criminal conduct on the part of third persons, either generally or at some particular time, that a duty is imposed on a possessor of land under section 344 of the Restatement, 2d: Moran v. … Accordingly, the court enters the following ORDER OF COURT And now, March 6, 1972, the preliminary objections of defendants, Bangor Park Board and the Borough of Bangor, are'hereby sustained.

Bove v. Hazleton Zoning Board

54 Pa. D. & C.2d 729 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County · Sep 8, 1971

The decision of the board was by a split decision of two members of the three-man board, one of the *730 members of the board being disqualified by virtue of his being a protestant to the proposed variance. … See O’Neill v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 384 Pa. 379 , 120 A. 2d 901 . There is however, additional authority for the establishment of off-street parking upon this lot.

Brown, Wheelock, Harris, Vought & Co. v. One Park Avenue Corp.

134 Misc. 313 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jun 13, 1929

(Baxter v. McDonnell, 154 N. Y. 432, 436 .)

Richardson v. New York State Board of Parole

71 Misc. 2d 36 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1972

Until recently parolees had been denied counsel at hearings before the parole board, however in People ex rel. Menechino v. … Menechino v.

People ex rel. Morgan v. Board of Supervisors

15 N.Y.S. 580 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1891

Coffin v. Coke, 4 Hun, 616 ; Robins v.Gould, 1 Abb. N. C. 133 ; McDonald v. Mallory, 46 N. Y. Super. Ct.58; Comins v. Supervisors, 3 Thomp. & C. 296. … Palen v. Starr, 7 Hun, 422 ; Ferguson v. Crawford, 86 N. Y. 609 .

In re Deering

14 Daly 89 · New York Court of Common Pleas · Dec 20, 1886

In Clark v. Norton ( 49 N. Y. 243 ), and Overing v. Foote, ( 65 N. … This was passed upon, and the validity of the contract sustained, in Brown v. The Mayor, etc. ( 63 N. Y. 239 ), and was not within the jurisdiction of the board (Matter of Lange, supra).

Board of Trustees v. Gordon

16 Pa. D. & C. 54 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Nov 24, 1931

Lamberton, J., This is a petition by the Board of Trustees of Eastern State Penitentiary for a declaratory judgment, declaring whether said board of trustees is entitled to have a preferred status as a depositor of the Aldine … If the Commonwealth is successful in such claim, the money of the board of trustees would be recovered from the surety company, and the surety company would be subrogated to the rights of the board of trustees as an ordinary

In re Ederer v. Board of Zoning Appeals

18 Ohio Misc. 143 · Medina County Court of Common Pleas · May 2, 1969

The latest declaration in Ohio distinguishing a restaurant from a drive-in is set forth by Justice Brown in the case of State, ex rel. Spiceia, v. … Killeen Realty Co., v.

Professional Staff Congress v. Board of Higher Education

83 Misc. 2d 900 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1975

Council 37], supra; Matter of Board of Educ. of Connetquot Cent. School Dist., 74 Misc 2d 336 ; see, also, Labor Bd. v Katz, 369 U.S. 736 ). … ; Voorhees & Hobart v Hobart, 251 App Div 111 ; Morrin v Structural Steel Bd. of Trade, 231 App Div 673 ; Pine Hill-Kingston Bus Corp. v Davis, 225 App Div 182 ).

Cookie's Diner, Inc. v. Columbus Board of Health

65 Ohio Misc. 2d 65 · Franklin County Municipal Court · Aug 9, 1994

, unless or until the General Assembly enacts a statute directing the boards to act on that specific new health hazard or disease, the boards could not. Jackson v. … The New York Court of Appeals in Boreali v.

Trauernicht v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services

95 Misc. 2d 394 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1978

.) *396 To compel disclosure would impinge upon the participating school boards’ predecisional and negotiating process, and cause irreparable harm to the Legislature’s declared policy of regional co-operative shared services … (Matter of McAulay v Board of Educ., 61 AD2d 1048 .) The petition is dismissed.

Genesee Valley National Bank v. Board of Supervisors

53 Barb. 223 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1869

Wanwyck, (not reported,) as Judge Bacon states in the case of Swift v. The City of Poughkeepsie, ( 37 N. Y. Rep. 512 ,) and in Barhyte v. Shepard, (35 id. 238.) I cannot see why the case of Swift v. … The dictum, or suggestion in The People v.

Wotkiewicz v. West Virginia Board of Regents

8 Ct. Cl. 155 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1970