Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersST

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Carolinas Cement Co. v. Zoning Appeals Board

    49 Va. Cir. 463 · Warren County Circuit Court · Aug 30, 1999

    Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris, 220 Va. 571, 574 , 260 S.E.2d 232, 235 (1979). … Knowlton v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Va., 220 Va. 571, 575-76 , 260 S.E.2d 232 (1979). In Board of Zoning Appeals v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Smrek v. Forest Area Board of Education

    18 Pa. D. & C.3d 104 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Forest County · Mar 31, 1981

    It is within the power of the boards of school directors to increase for any person or group of persons, included in any schedule, the initial salary or the amount of an increment or the number of increments. … Clearly the board under section 1152 has the discretion to establish a policy to increase the salary for any employe or groups of employes in excess of the prescribed minimums by legislative fiat.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Price Township Board of Supervisors

    17 Pa. D. & C.3d 624 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County · Feb 6, 1981

    THOMSON, J., In the within matter, an appeal from a refusal of the Price Township Board of Supervisors to approve a subdivision application by appellants Anderson, the Snow Hill Property Owners’ Association and various individual

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doutt v. Butler County Board of Elections

    66 Pa. D. & C.2d 797 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Butler County · May 3, 1974

    DILLON, On April 10, 1974, plaintiff filed his complaint in mandamus against the Butler County Board of Elections. Nomination petitions of Thomas Pawlowicz and Patsy J. … Plaintiff invokes section 2936 of the Election Code wherein it is provided that the county board has the duty to examine nomination petitions.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borough of Greenville v. Board of Directors

    18 Pa. D. & C.2d 444 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County · Jul 10, 1958

    On April 11,18 and 25,1958, the Board of Directors of the Greenville School District advertised their intention to adopt a similar one percent tax. Said resolution was adopted on May 19, 1958. … This action in equity was brought by the Borough of Greenville against the Board of Directors of the Green-ville School District to restrain the latter from adopting or enforcing this tax.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Board of Funeral Directors v. Schroeder

    89 Pa. D. & C. 345 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · May 10, 1954

    The appeal brings before us the record as certified by the board. The case has been duly argued and is now before us for disposition. Defendant, Bernard K. … Schroeder, filed his application with the board on December 27, 1952. In lieu of certain educational requirements he offered 15 years’ experience as a student apprentice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baumgartner v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment

    29 Pa. D. & C. 103 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · Mar 5, 1937

    Such discretion having been vested in the board of adjustment, it follows that the court will not, in the absence of clear, proof of an abuse of such discretion, interfere with the action of the board. … The judgment of the zoning board of adjustment is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Broad-Miami Co. v. Board of Zoning Adjustment

    89 Ohio Law. Abs. 140 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Aug 7, 1959

    Onge v. … See also Fortune v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 60 A. (2d), 133; Moody v. City of University Park, 278 S. W. (2d), 912 ; Kaczorowski v. Elmhurst Stone Co., 141 N. E. (2d), 14; Culinary Institute of America, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • First National Bank v. Board of Education

    15 Ohio C.C. 561 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Dec 15, 1897

    (Dunn v. Freed, 10 Cir. Ct. 294.) Difficulty arises only when it is sought to apply them to a particular group of facts — in discriminating the different classes of apparatus to which these sections respectively relate. … (Board of Ed. v. Andrews, 51 Ohio St., 199 .) These are the only adjudications upon the sections in question, and were they in no sense authority for us, would have our entire approval.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • City of Cincinnati v. Board of Commissioners

    1 Disney (Ohio) 4 · Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · Nov 15, 1854

    It is not to be expected that the defendant should, and, indeed, it is not in the power of the board of county commissioners, to enter on the public streets of the city, and change their grade; the care and supervision of … The same principle which governed the decision in the case of Cincinnati v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. O'Brien v. Town Board

    29 Misc. 440 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1899

    The relator applies for a writ of mandamus compelling the town board to award her a teacher’s pension. … Hence, the general resolution, being upon the request of the petition and the town board to vote a pension for William H.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Commissioners of Pilots v. Spofford

    11 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 74 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1875

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Southold Savings Bank v. Board of Education

    44 Misc. 74 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1904

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Board of Supervisors v. City of Kingston

    3 N.Y.S. 221 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1888

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marriage Encounter, Inc. v. Board of Assessors

    75 Misc. 2d 147 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1973

    In. this tax certiorari proceeding, the petitioner moves for summary judgment declaring that its real *148 property was exempt from taxation on the May 1, 1972, tax status date; for an order directing the respondent Board … On or about May 1, the Board of Assessors published its tentative assessment roll which included the subject property.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Civil Service Commission

    33 Ohio Misc. 2d 1 · Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · May 9, 1985

    Plaintiff, Board of Education of the Olmsted Falls City School District, is seeking a declaratory judgment as to the constitutionality and applicability of R.C. 124.011. … the City of Olmsted Falls is a municipal civil service commission established and operating pursuant to the Ohio Constitution, the charter of the City of Olmsted Falls, and, regarding certain non-teaching employees of the Board

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Linz v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

    30 Ill. Ct. Cl. 199 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Dec 4, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Cook v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

    28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 282 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Apr 16, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Campbell v. State of Illinois, Pollution Control Board

    28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 213 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 2, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Stempel v. Albany County Board of Elections

    121 Misc. 2d 234 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1983

    Section 7 of article V of the rules of the party read as follows: “Conservative Party nominations of candidates for public office within each of the several towns and villages within Albany County shall be made at a party … The certificates of nomination here contested are declared null and void and the Albany County Board of Elections is restrained from placing the names of the candidates respondents upon any appropriate ballot as Conservative

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.