Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.01s
People ex rel. Noyes v. Board of Canvassers
35 N.Y. St. Rep. 1000 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1891
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textPeople ex rel. Evans v. Board of Commissioners
33 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 153 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1881
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion textSanitary Water Board v. Blue Coal Corp.
56 Pa. D. & C.2d 582 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Dec 14, 1971
That the operation of the facilities by Blue Coal Corporation is sufficient to insure that any discharge to waters of the Commonwealth will meet Sanitary Water Board standards as set forth in the Board’s Rules and Regulations … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPanos v. Millcreek Township Board of Adjustment
72 Pa. D. & C. 373 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County · Apr 3, 1950
J., This matter is before us on an appeal from an order of the Board of Adjustment of Millcreek Township, refusing appellant a per *374 mit to erect 10 cabins, a store and a utility building on lot no. 13, Tracy Acres Subdivision … Whether or not this is so, however, in our opinion the action of the board of adjustment must be sustained. And now, to wit, April 3, 1950, the appeal is dismissed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNevins, Inc. v. State Board of Pharmacy
41 Pa. D. & C. 325 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Feb 3, 1941
Counsel for the board argues that the very use of the word “deems” presupposes consideration and deliberation on the part of the board. … To the authorities therein referred to we may add the case of Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSave the Pine Bush, Inc. v. Planning Board
101 Misc. 2d 1062 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1979
Joyce’s son does not constitute valid personal service even though the pleadings subsequently came into the possession of the person to be served (see McDonald v Ames Supply Co., 22 NY2d 111 ). … Joyce tried to evade service (see Buscher v Ehrich, 12 AD2d 887 ).
Cited 3 timesPublishedMarriage Encounter, Inc. v. Board of Assessors
75 Misc. 2d 147 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1973
In. this tax certiorari proceeding, the petitioner moves for summary judgment declaring that its real *148 property was exempt from taxation on the May 1, 1972, tax status date; for an order directing the respondent Board … On or about May 1, the Board of Assessors published its tentative assessment roll which included the subject property.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMosaic Tile Co. v. Board of Review
66 Ohio Law. Abs. 247 · Muskingum County Court of Common Pleas · Feb 6, 1953
OPINION By CROSSLAND, J:— The appeal to this Court from the decision of the Board of Review of the Ohio Bureau of Unemployment Compensation disallowing appellant’s appeal from the determination oí a referee’s decision affirming … (Shannon v. Bureau, 155 Oh St, 53, 1st syllabus.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrowne v. United States Board & Paper Co.
6 Ohio N.P. 254 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Jul 1, 1897
Browne, who was also a member of said board of directors, and participated as such in the making of the oontract. … The court said in Stewart v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Board & Paper Co. v. Browne
1 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 345 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 15, 1903
Browne, was one of the board/ of directors of the defendant; the other members being Charles W. Bell, H. C. Yeiser, Jackson H. Dnnoain and Henry M. Wrigiley. The said Charles W. … not exceed $22.51 per ton for plain, steam dried straw board, free on board, at tbe mill, and tbe price on all other products of the mill shall be on the same relative basis as determined by the board of directors, and tbe
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrowne v. United States Board & Paper Co.
11 Ohio Cir. Dec. 102 · Ohio Circuit Courts · Jul 1, 1909
The answer of the defendant was, first, a general denial of all allegations not therein admitted, and, second, allegations to the effect that the contract was made with Browne, and Stewart while Browne was acting as a director … There was no allegation in the answer that the contract was made by Browne while acting as a director, and that it was an unfair contract. We think under the decision of our Supreme Court in Rolling Stock Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoard of Education v. Federal Construction Co.
25 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 466 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division · Jul 1, 1925
This rule is sustained in State v. … These authorities are not in conflict with Ross v. Board of Education, 42 O. S., 374. None of these cases exactly conform to the case at bar.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSunday Telegram Corp. v. Board of Supervisors
133 Misc. 496 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1929
The legislative power given to the board of supervisors is a delegated power. … The people of the county of Albany are represented by their board of supervisors. One of the duties imposed by statute upon the board of supervisors is to designate official newspapers.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRexford Flats Bridge Co. v. Canal Board
81 Misc. 330 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1913
Cited 0 timesPublishedVillage of Oneida v. Board of Supervisors
40 N.Y. St. Rep. 985 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1891
Cited 0 timesPublishedRawe v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment
2 Misc. 2d 320 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1955
Hawkins, constituting the Erie County Board of Equalization, for an order in the nature of prohibition to restrain the State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Steven Pankow as mayor of the City of Buffalo, and Henry J … If such appeal is brought in behalf of the town, the majority of the town board of such town; in behalf of the city, the majority of the aldermen or councilmen or board *322 of estimate of said city, shall first consent to
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson v. Henrico County Board of Supervisors
18 Va. Cir. 455 · Henrico County Circuit Court · Feb 5, 1990
The language of Section 2-6 belies any such intent on the part of the Board of Supervisors. … While it would appear that the Board of Supervisors could delegate final authority of approving PODs to the Commission, see § 15.1-473(b), the Court finds that the Board of Supervisors has not done so.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Baldwin v. Board of Supervisors
12 How. Pr. 204 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1856
Neither of these acts directs how the accounts of the marshal shall be made out, verified, or proved, and they are, therefore, necessarily governed by the general provisions of law regulating accounts presented to boards … It is the duty of boards of supervisors “ to examine, settle and allqw all accounts chargeable against their respective counties.”
Cited 3 timesPublishedMorris v. West Virginia Board of Education
4 Ct. Cl. 12 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1947
See Dillon v. Summers County Board of Education, 1 Ct. Claims (W. Va.) 366; Richards v. State and Calhoun County Boards of Education, 3 Ct. Claims (W. Va.) 251. … the negligence of an employe of the local board.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPeople ex rel. Baker v. Board of Apportionment
8 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 123 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1874
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text
Ask Donna