Case law

Hamelin v. Zoning Board

19 Conn. Supp. 445 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · Aug 3, 1955

Kammerman v. LeRoy, 133 Conn. 232 . Owners of residential property in the vicinity were recognized to fit the category. Farr v. Zoning Board, 139 Conn. 577 . … O’Connor v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 140 Conn. 65, 71 . We also have another definition of “aggrieved.”

Stempel v. Albany County Board of Elections

121 Misc. 2d 234 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1983

Section 7 of article V of the rules of the party read as follows: “Conservative Party nominations of candidates for public office within each of the several towns and villages within Albany County shall be made at a party … The certificates of nomination here contested are declared null and void and the Albany County Board of Elections is restrained from placing the names of the candidates respondents upon any appropriate ballot as Conservative

Rogers v. Loudoun County Board of Supervisors

38 Va. Cir. 235 · Loudoun County Circuit Court · Nov 20, 1995

They appeal contending that the Board’s decision was arbitrary and an abuse of discretion. … Foote made it clear during his argument that the Appellants do not argue that the Board’s decision is contrary to law) or that the screening required by the Board’s decision provides no concealment at all.

City of Newark v. Board of Education

28 Ohio N.P. (n.s.) 297 · Licking County Court of Common Pleas · Jan 9, 1931

S., page 607, *298 East Cleveland v. Board of Education. Five members of the Supreme Court were of the opinion that this statute is unconstitutional. Two were of the opinion that it was valid. … was taken to the Supreme Court, is reported in 118 Ohio State, page 295, Board of Education of City School District of Columbus v.

People ex rel. Kleet v. Town Board

27 Misc. 470 · New York Supreme Court · May 15, 1899

. *471 receive two dollars per day in the absence of action by the board of supervisors fixing their compensation at a higher rate, which concededly was not done. … But under the facts as they are presented there does not seem to be opportunity for relief in these proceedings, and furthermore, as appears by the facts as submitted, the town board have awarded them extra compensation.

Board of Commissioners of Excise v. Hogan

41 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 625 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1884

Cleveland Clinic v. Board of Vocational Education

10 Ct. Cl. 101 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Aug 14, 1974

JONES, JUDGE: In September, 1971, the respondent, Board of Vocational Education, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, sent a client from the Mullens District to Cleveland Clinic, the claimant in this case, for physical

B. Preiser Co. v. Board of Control

3 Ct. Cl. 9 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1945

The board of control, through its officers, in a communication sent to this court, stated substantially that the claim should be paid and that the board of control feels that it is a just claim and that compensation should … The position of the board of control in the matter is affirmed by the office of the attorney general 'hrough its assistant, in the approval that is likewise submitted with the communication of the board of control.

Von der Heide v. Zoning Board of Appeals

204 Misc. 746 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1953

(Matter of Colasuonno v. Dassler, 183 Misc. 904, 906 .) … Co. v. Chase, 197 App. Div. 327, 331 .)

Silverman v. State of Illinois, Capital Development Board

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 394 · Court of Claims of Illinois · May 10, 1974

Elovitz v. State of Illinois, Pollution Control Board

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 223 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 8, 1973

McCarry v. State of Illinois, Illinois Racing Board

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 86 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jul 9, 1970

Starin v. Village Board of Zoning Appeals

198 Misc. 785 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1950

the board of appeals can act, the petitioner must file with the board of appeals, consents duly acknowledged of the owners of 80% of the frontage deemed by the board of appeals to be immediately affected by the proposed … Petitioners now seek this order asserting that insofar as the village board, by the ordinance quoted, has purported to delegate to adjoining owners, the power to confer upon or withhold from the board of zoning appeals, authority

Control Board of the Harrisburg School District v. Board of School Directors

80 Pa. D. & C.4th 539 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jun 27, 2006

See Summit Towne Centre Inc. v. Shoe Show of Rocky Mount Inc., 573 Pa. 637 , 828 A.2d 995 (2003). … We point the elected board to Central Dauphin Education Association v. Central Dauphin School District, 792 A.2d 691 (Pa. Commw. 2001), 60 D.

Brown v. Grover

Superior Court of Maine · May 22, 2013

BROWN, ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) JUDGMENT … Maine Jury Instruction Manua( §7-35, citing Stewart v.

People ex rel. Bevins v. Board of Sup'rs

31 N.Y.S. 248 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1894

In People v. Supervisors of Ulster Co., 93 N. … People v. Board of Supervisors, 73 N. Y. 173 . The supervisors therefore rejected the bill because it was not a valid claim against the town.

People ex rel. McIver v. Board of Education

17 Barb. 299 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1853

Mills v. Bristol Township Board of Commissioners

4 Pa. D. & C.3d 559 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Jan 10, 1978

However, that power had to be exercised in strict compliance with applicable Civil Service Laws; substantial compliance is not sufficient: Chomas v. Township of Elizabeth, 120 Pitts.L.J. 107 (1971); Snizaski v. … See Consumers Education and Protective Association v. Nolan, 470 Pa. 372 , 368 A. 2d 675 (1977).

Marley v. Board of Trustees

15 Misc. 3d 1068 · New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2007

(Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 90 NY2d at 147 .) … Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 59 AD2d 696, 697 [1st Dept 1977]; see also Matter of Rodriguez v Board of Trustees of N.Y. City Fire Dept., Art. 1-B Pension Fund, 3 AD3d at 502 ; Matter of Stack v Board of Trustees of N.Y.

Brotherton v. Board of Trustees of Quogue

50 Misc. 2d 389 · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 1966

(See Marcus v. Incorporated Vil. of Spring Valley, 24 A D 2d 1021 [2d Dept.]) … Westchester Motels v. Village of Elmsford, 20 A D 2d 818).