Case law

Neff v. Board of Commissioners

74 Ohio Law. Abs. 441 · Belmont County Court of Common Pleas · Dec 7, 1956

In the case of Belden, Appellant, v. … Guilbert, Auditor, v.

Brown v. Austin

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 1, 2013

Reid v. Town of Mount Vernon, 2007 ME 125, <J[ 14, 932 A.2d 539. … (Brown Aff. <J[<J[ 6-7.) Because of the emotional distress resulting from Mr. Parent's death, Ms. Brown is taking medicine and under a physician's care and is currently unemployed. (Brown Aff. <J[<J[ 8-9.)

State v. Board of Education

5 Ohio Cir. Dec. 447 · Darke Circuit Court · May 15, 1895

Dillon, J., in Gause v. Clarksville, Federal Cases No. 5276; Borough of Henderson v. County of Sibley, 28 Minn., 15 . Pimental v. … Argenti v. San Francisco, 16 Cal., 282.

W & G Ltd. v. Workers' Compensation Board

131 Misc. 2d 329 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1986

Arbitration (Clemens v Apple, 65 NY2d 746 ; Ziegler v Raskin, 100 AD2d 814 ; Compton v D'Amore, 101 AD2d 800 ) and administrative determinations (Ryan v New York Tel. … ; Botwinick v Ogden, 59 NY2d 909 ; Liss v Trans Auto Sys., 109 AD2d 430 ).

Worth v. Lititz Borough Zoning Hearing Board

73 Pa. D. & C.2d 270 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County · Jun 9, 1975

Wonder, to whom the special exception was granted, bases his motion to quash on the holding of this court in Krisanosky v. New Holland Borough, 65 D. & C. 2d 464 (1974). … Section 1006(3)(b) of the code provides that appeals to court from any decision of the zoning hearing board may be taken by any party aggrieved by appeal filed within 30 days after notice of the decision is issued.

State Board of Podiatry Examiners v. Lerner

43 Pa. D. & C.2d 133 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County · Jul 5, 1967

The reason assigned by the board and the statutory authority cited to support its action bear no reasonable relation to a proper exercise of the police power in denying an individual licensed to practice a profession the … Therefore, they afford no authority for the board’s action.

Universal Kinnebrook Inc. v. Board of Assessors

89 Misc. 2d 674 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1977

*675 trative Judge but before the respondent board of assessors has filed its appraisal report? … It appears that the petitioner has timely completed and filed its appraisal report, while the respondent, Board of Assessors, Town of Thompson, has not filed its appraisal report.

Mann v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

37 Ohio Misc. 3 · Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County · Sep 18, 1973

Daniel Buehlmann, the Director of the Hamilton County Board of Elections and Mr. Paul Bosenberg a citizen of this community and manager of the councilmanie campaign for Mr. David S. Mann. … C. 3501.18 and 3506.16 and in light of other related statutes that the Board of Elections has violated his constitutional rights as an individual and as a candidate; and that the board acted illegally in realigning precincts

Watson v. Board of Embalmers & Funeral Directors

30 Ohio Law Rep. 16 · Cuyahoga Circuit Court · Jan 11, 1965

J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill and Brown, JJ., concur. .

Board of Education v. Wager Construction Corp.

74 Misc. 2d 864 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1973

(See, dissenting opn., Matter of Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 2 [Hanover Ins. Co.], 22 A D 2d 936, affd. 16 N Y 2d 673; unreported decision of Mr. Justice Arthur C. Aulisi in Matter of Board of Educ. v. … (Shalman v. Board of Educ. of Cent. School Dist. No. 1, 31 A D 2d 338.) As in the Shalman ease the parties to the instant proceeding have not submitted the contract itself to the court for consideration.

Board of Education v. Commissioner of Education

61 Misc. 2d 741 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1969

Southern Dutchess Country Club v. Town Board

47 Misc. 2d 820 · New York Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1965

Article V of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Fishkill, relating to amendments, provides in section 501 thereof: ‘ ‘ The Town Board may * * * on its own motion, on petition, or on recommendation of the Planning Board or … In the case at bar, petitioner’s application for a change of zoning made to the respondent Town Board was properly referred by said board to the Planning Board for review and recommendation.

People ex rel. Barlow v. Canal Board

2 Thomp. & Cook 242 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1873

It was surrendered under section 2 of the aforesaid chapter, and said surrender was accepted by the canal board, to take effect April 15, 1870. … Case thereupon, on November 23,1871, presented a petition to the canal board asking that an award be made to him for “permanent improvements,” and such award was made, by a • resolution of the canal board, on the 30th day

Trustees of Havana v. Board of Supervisors

9 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 600 · New York Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

Antisdel v. Tioga County Board of Elections

85 Misc. 2d 174 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1976

To support this argument they rely on Matter of Corrigan v Board of Elections of Suffolk County ( 38 AD2d 825, 826 ). … (See Schieffelin v. Komfort, 212 N. Y. 520, 531 .)”

People ex rel. Dinsmore v. Croton Aqueduct Board

5 Abb. Pr. 372 · New York Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1857

The order does not bind them, and, as against them, does not protect the Croton Board. … It may be that the Croton Board could have filed a bill of interpleader. Of the expediency of doing so they were the judges.

Town of Greenburgh v. Board of Supervisors

55 Misc. 2d 1031 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1968

; and in the decision of this court dated August 23, 1967, in which a fourth plan was held to be in accordance with the 11 one person-one vote ” standard laid down in Reynolds v. … Obviously the board should proceed with the results of the last election in mind.

Hagan v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

43 Va. Cir. 555 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · Nov 12, 1997

Specifically, the defendant Board of Supervisors of Fairfax County (die "County”) contends that Hagan’s grievance was not timely filed.

Greene v. Fairfax County Board of Supervisors

40 Va. Cir. 144 · Fairfax County Circuit Court · May 16, 1996

City of Alexandria v. Potomac Greens Assoc., 245 Va. 371, 378 (1993). … In Bradley v.

Riccardi v. Plymouth Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

16 Pa. D. & C.2d 243 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County · Sep 25, 1958

This action is a sequel to Riccardi v. Plymouth Township Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 337 (1958). The facts set forth therein are incorporated herein by reference. … He relies on three cases decided in Massachusetts: Siegemund v. Building Commissioner, 259 Mass. 329 , 156 N. E. 852 (1927) ; Sunderland v. Building Inspector, 328 Mass. 638 , 105 N. E. 2d 471 (1952); Pratt v.