Case law

Mellon-Stuart Co. v. Board of Regents

16 Ct. Cl. 59 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1986

By agreement dated the 26th day of September, 1977, the West Virginia Board of Regents entered into an architectural agreement with Robert J. … Prior to receiving the bids, the architects furnished to the Board of Regents a project time schedule dated November 30, 1978 in the form of a Bar Chart. *60 On March 1, 1979, the bid tabulations were made.

Chapman Printing Co. v. Board of Regents

15 Ct. Cl. 165 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Sep 27, 1984

Green Administrator of Hale v. Brown Administrator of White

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 347 · Court of Chancery of South Carolina · Feb 21, 1729

General Communications Co. v. Board of Regents

14 Ct. Cl. 5 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Aug 6, 1981

Scott v. Board of Elections of Washington

30 Misc. 2d 397 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1961

This is an application for an order directing and compelling the Board of Elections of Washington County to accept for filing, nunc pro tunc, as of the 19th day of September, 1961, the independent nominating petition of the

Wente Construction Co. v. Board of Regents

13 Ct. Cl. 346 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1981

WALLACE, JUDGE: This claim was filed by Wente Construction Company, Inc., against the Board of Regents, in the amount of $93,769.08 for task orders performed by the company on the Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) Phase II Implementation … See Cook v. Department of Finance and Administration, 11 Ct.Cl. 28 (1975), and Hedges v. Board of Regents, 11 Ct.Cl. 156 (1976). Award of $70,249.78.

Free Synagogue of Flushing v. Board of Estimate

57 Misc. 2d 80 · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 1968

(See Lakeville Merrick Corp. v. Town Board of Town of Islip, 23 A D 2d 584; Mazzara v. Town of Pittsford, 54 Misc 2d 600 .) I am of the opinion that these rules apply with equal force to the City Planning Commission. … [b]; see, also, Scheer v.

Niagara Recycling, Inc. v. Town Board of Niagara

108 Misc. 2d 277 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1981

Corp., 69 AD2d 222 , supra; and see Bliek v Town of Webster, 104 Misc 2d 852, 861-862 ). … The defendants’ “determination of non-significance” was expressly founded upon the town board’s opinion that the proposed action, being legislative in nature, would not cause any of the adverse effects described in 6 NYCRR

Roosevelt Nassau Operating Corp. v. Board of Assessors

68 Misc. 2d 183 · New York Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1970

Tax Comm., 19 A D 2d 56; Matter of United States of Amer. v. Tax Comm., 22 A D 2d 290; Killip Laundering Co. v. State of N. Y., 32 A D 2d 579; J. W. Mays, Inc., v. Tax Comm., 21 A D 2d 801, affd. 16 N Y 2d 529.) … (See, also, Woolworth Co. v. Comm. of Taxation and Assessment, 26 A D 2d 759; People ex rel. Gale v.

Stickley v. Rockingham County Board of Supervisors

47 Va. Cir. 347 · Rockingham County Circuit Court · Nov 13, 1998

See, e.g, Ticonderoga Farms v. County of Loudoun, 242 Va. 170 (1991); Resource Conservation *351 Management, Inc. v. Board of Supvrs. of Prince William County, 238 Va. 15 (1989). … Chris Brown, Esquire, counsel for the Respondent, and to Bonnie L. Paul, Esquire, counsel for Petitioner.

Powers v. West Virginia Board of Education

7 Ct. Cl. 242 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Nov 8, 1968

The facts show that it was the Board of Education of Hancock County which exclusively had control and operation of the school where decedent suffered the injuries resulting in his death. … Clearly the case involved only the property and employees of the Hancock County Board of Education.

Regenstreif v. Board of Assessors

20 Misc. 3d 787 · New York Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2008

(Matter of Barbera v Assessor of Town of Pelham, 278 AD2d 412 [2d Dept 2000], lv denied 96 NY2d 711 [2001]; Matter of McNamara v Board of Assessors of Town of Smithtown, 272 AD2d 617 [2d Dept 2000].) … Watergate II Apts, v Buffalo Sewer Auth., 46 NY2d 52 [1978].)

People ex rel. Morrison v. Board of Supervisors

10 N.Y.S. 88 · New York Supreme Court · May 26, 1890

Y. 196 , and People v. Town Auditors, 82 N. Y. 80 . The same doctrine is found in People v. Supervisors Cortland County, 58 Barb. 139 . … In People v. Board Supervisors Queens County, 33 Hun, 305 , there was a dispute as to the facts, and the amount allowed and accepted was stated to be in full. Such is not the case here. See, on this point, People v.

Kemp v. Monroe County Board of Elections

129 Misc. 2d 491 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1985

On all of the foregoing, the court grants the relief requested by each of the petitioners and directs the respondent Board of Elections to reinstate the designating petitions of said petitioners. … Cooper, the Board of Elections correctly invalidated the 10 signatures on page 4 of their petition because the subscribing witness did not show her post-office address, to wit: Fairport, New York.

Oetgen v. Board of Trustees

36 Ill. Ct. Cl. 269 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Mar 6, 1984

Mustain v. Shaver (1981), 96 Ill. App. 3d 86 , 420 N.E.2d 1197 . The record fails to contain any evidence of a misrepresentation with intent to defraud made by the Respondent. Even though Claimant relied on Mr.

Board of Education v. City of Buffalo

57 Misc. 2d 472 · New York Supreme Court · Aug 22, 1968

The Court of Appeals recently stated in Matter of Westchester Reform Temple v. … (People v. O’Gorman, 274 N. Y. 284 .)

Quality Marketing, Inc. v. Board of Trustees

22 Ct. Cl. 115 · West Virginia Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1998

On or about May 26, 1987, the claimant and the respondent (Board of Regents) entered into a contract whereby the claimant agreed to furnish to the respondent the annual coal requirements for West Virginia University’s three

Board of Education v. State

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 609 · Court of Claims of Illinois · Jun 1, 1935

The facts so far as they apply particularly to this case, are as follows: The Board of Trustees of Fondulac Township, Tazewell County, Illinois, holds the legal title to Lots 595, 596, 597, 598, and 599 in Richland Place

Sears v. Bensalem Township Board of Supervisors

10 Pa. D. & C.3d 52 · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County · Mar 13, 1979

KELTON, J., — We are asked to determine in these proceedings whether the Bensalem Township Board of Supervisors may totally prohibit a so-called “self-service” facility for the retail dispensing of gasoline in a zoning district … The only case, to our knowledge, addressing the effect of section 13.115 on a zoning ordinance is Open Pantry Food Marts v. Com., 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 423 , 391 A. 2d 20 (1978), cited in the parties’ briefs.

Maldonado v. New York State Board of Parole

102 Misc. 2d 880 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1979

Wright, 568 F2d 142; Turner v American Bar Assn., 407 F Supp 451 ; United States v Hinderman, 528 F2d 100). … For the foregoing reasons, the motion is denied. *882 The court further recommends that the Board of Parole and the superintendents of the State correctional institutions inform each inmate law clerk under their jurisdiction